Mercurial > hg > rsof
comparison MHMC/2024-05-07/notes.txt @ 415:a35b97677885
starting Minute
| author | Henry Thompson <ht@markup.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| date | Tue, 07 May 2024 18:30:11 +0100 |
| parents | |
| children | a5d183b888bd |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 414:2389b29b95b3 | 415:a35b97677885 |
|---|---|
| 1 | |
| 2 1. Opening worship | |
| 3 Present: HST, JN, RF, CD | |
| 4 Prevented: SS, LQ | |
| 5 2. Matters arising | |
| 6 2.1 Wrt 3.2. Lighting | |
| 7 ACTION: HST to contact Jean Carletta about more replacable fitting? | |
| 8 No news yet | |
| 9 ACTION: HST&JK to put a request to Trustees for approval for a | |
| 10 budget of £10,000 with Gunn: DONE | |
| 11 2.2 Wrt 3.3. Carpets | |
| 12 ACTION: HST&JK to put a request to Trustees for approval, using | |
| 13 recycled carpet tiles: Not yet | |
| 14 2.3 Wrt 3.4. Flat 3F2 at 6 Upper Bow | |
| 15 We AGREED to go ahead on this basis: Hartley pushed back, with | |
| 16 explanation that 'artists' enjoyed a better rate structure, with | |
| 17 evidence. MG and HST agreed to accept his offer of £3,500. | |
| 18 3. Local Meeting on 12 May | |
| 19 We still need someone to attend if possible, as HST can't be there. | |
| 20 HST to copy JN and RF with notice to LM Clerks and one of them will | |
| 21 try to be at LM | |
| 22 4. Time without staff | |
| 23 We AGREE that any arrangement with MS and B? will happen until a | |
| 24 new post is agreed and described. | |
| 25 For discussion with MG: | |
| 26 1) What tasks has she been doing which will need to be covered by | |
| 27 MKE, and what training will be required. | |
| 28 2) A possible timetable for her availability: where and when | |
| 29 MG should certainly be _allowed_ to go, but if she's _willing_ to | |
| 30 be here for some number of weeks in July and August. | |
| 31 She _might_ want to do at least some of this to get closure. | |
| 32 So the invitation to a discussion should be tentative: to talk | |
| 33 about handover tasks? to talk about what might be possible after 1 July? | |
| 34 Removal scheduling is an issue, because | |
| 35 Catriona is available for the 3 relevant weeks | |
| 36 Hallmaster _can_ communicate with Xero | |
| 37 Week 1 is the real point where we need cover to be involved in | |
| 38 what's going on | |
| 39 We need the current staffing timetable, from JN and MG, so we know | |
| 40 what we need to cover, both over the Fringe and in the autumn | |
| 41 We _can_ close the building on, e.g. Mondays and on Friday afternoons. | |
| 42 We do need more casual staff, and if possible ones who will be | |
| 43 planning to stay | |
| 44 ACTION: JN to circulate the spreadsheet of duties she compiled. | |
| 45 July and August are really different from September... | |
| 46 HST will meet on a regular basis with MKE, both as a group and | |
| 47 individually. Scheduling is tricky. Some regular closures may be | |
| 48 necessary in order to have some staff overlap, so we can have M4. | |
| 49 We will have a 'phone tree. | |
| 50 Some all-hands meetings as well. | |
| 51 | |
| 52 Draft minute: | |
| 53 | |
| 54 5. Any other business | |
| 55 | |
| 56 5.1 John Renshaw will visit in the week beginning 27 May to begin | |
| 57 the on-site Quinquenial Review | |
| 58 | |
| 59 6. Date of next meeting |