--- a/summa/english/FP_ii.html	Sun Jan 03 18:47:31 2010 +0000
+++ b/summa/english/FP_ii.html	Sun Jan 03 18:56:45 2010 +0000
@@ -6804,7 +6804,7 @@
                      <b>Reply to Objection 3:</b> Things are said to be false, not as compared with the divine intellect, in which case they would be false simply, but as
                      compared with our intellect; and thus they are false only relatively.
                   </p>
-                  <p id="FP_Q17_A1-p12"> To the argument which is urged on the contrary, likeness or defective representation does not involve the idea of falsity
+                  <p id="FP_Q17_A1-p12"><b>Reply to further objection:</b> To the argument which is urged on the contrary, likeness or defective representation does not involve the idea of falsity
                      except in so far as it gives occasion to false opinion. Hence a thing is not always said to be false, because it resembles
                      another thing; but only when the resemblance is such as naturally to produce a false opinion, not in any one case, but in
                      the majority of instances.
@@ -7136,7 +7136,7 @@
                      others a life of virtue. In this way the contemplative life is distinguished from the active, and thus to know God is said
                      to be life eternal.
                   </p>
-                  <p id="FP_Q18_A2-p10"> Wherefore the Reply to the Third Objection is clear.</p>
+                  <p id="FP_Q18_A2-p10"><b>Reply to Objection 3:</b> Wherefore the Reply to the Third Objection is clear.</p>
                   <p id="FP_Q18_A2-p11"></p>
                   <p id="FP_Q18_A2-p12"></p>
                   <a href="summa.FP_Q18_A1.html"></a>