--- a/summa/english/FP_ix.html	Tue Aug 10 19:31:35 2010 +0000
+++ b/summa/english/FP_ix.html	Sun Mar 20 14:00:20 2011 +0000
@@ -696,7 +696,8 @@
                      to which this power belongs, is the form of the body, and the term of human generation. And so the Philosopher says (De Anima
                      iii) that the intellect is separate, because it is not the faculty of a corporeal organ.
                   </p>
-                  <p id="FP_Q76_A1-p18"> From this it is clear how to answer the Second and Third objections: since, in order that man may be able to understand all
+                  <p id="FP_Q76_A1-p18"> <b>Reply to Objections 2
+	  &amp; 3:</b> From this it is clear how to answer the Second and Third objections: since, in order that man may be able to understand all
                      things by means of his intellect, and that his intellect may understand immaterial things and universals, it is sufficient
                      that the intellectual power be not the act of the body.
                   </p>
@@ -880,9 +881,16 @@
                      animals, is corruptible. If, therefore, in man it be incorruptible, the sensitive soul in man and brute animals will not be
                      of the same "genus." Now an animal is so called from its having a sensitive soul; and,
                      therefore, "animal" will not be one genus common to man and other animals, which is absurd.
-                  </p>
-                  <p id="FP_Q76_A3-p4">
-                     <b>Objection 3:</b> Further, the Philosopher says, Metaph. viii (Did. vii, 2), that the genus is taken from the matter, and difference from the
+                  </p><p id="FP_Q76_A3-p3a"><!-- Added by HST, missing
+in original, copied from
+	http://www.nd.edu/~afreddos/summa-translation/Part%201/st1-ques76.pdf --><b>Objection 3:</b> In <i>De Generatione Animalium</i> the Philosopher claims that the embryo is an animal
+before being a man.  But this cannot be the case if the same essence belongs to both the sentient soul and
+the intellective soul, since something is an animal through the sentient soul and a man through the
+intellective soul.  Therefore, it is not the case that in a man the sentient and intellective souls have a
+single essence.</p>
+                  <p id="FP_Q76_A3-p4"><!-- labelled Objection 3 in
+the  original -->
+                     <b>Objection 4:</b> Further, the Philosopher says, Metaph. viii (Did. vii, 2), that the genus is taken from the matter, and difference from the
                      form. But "rational," which is the difference constituting man, is taken from the intellectual soul; while he is called "animal"
                      by reason of his having a body animated by a sensitive soul. Therefore the intellectual soul may be compared to the body animated
                      by a sensitive soul, as form to matter. Therefore in man the intellectual soul is
@@ -10701,4 +10709,4 @@
             <a href="summa.FP_Q74_A3.html"></a>
             <a href="summa.FP_Q75.html"></a>
          `
-     </div>
\ No newline at end of file
+     </div>