Mercurial > hg > rsof
view HeavenOnEarth/notes.txt @ 208:b1f88292d482
end of TPA talking head day 2
author | Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 17 Jun 2021 22:42:15 +0100 |
parents | 1bc6cf72ea70 |
children | 59f4ab0279f7 |
line wrap: on
line source
Tim Peat Ashworth: Paul as focussed on the transformation of all creation, originating in the transformation of ourselves. Finding that throughout the NT. "The William": There's a big gap in the New Testament narratives: the Romans, the resistance, Masada (73 CE), etc. Why? Stuart M: Tension between the quiet, inward worship practice and the noisy, outward, charismatic behaviour it underpinned. The struggle to survive post-Restoration plus the failure of the expectation of external transformation put the previous public aspect of Quakerism had to be reined in. Barclay gives up on radical equality: God's plan allows for different wealth for different people. Branston-Hicks metaphor! Is there still a real labour and birth still to come? TPA: But note that in early Christianity the challenge of organisation vs. inspiration leads to an emergence of hierarchy, but that never happened among Friends... Ben Dandelion: Fox appealing to "30 minutes of silence" in Revelation, and the inward communion in Revelation 3:20 (?: "Here I am! I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in and eat with that person, and they with me."). Evangelical framing of their situation in the 18th century falls in line with the "sometime in the distance" for the expectation of the 2nd Coming How can we reframe the idea of Heaven on Earth, reinvent the tradition, to keep the possibility of transformation alive. How do we make sense of what is essentially a 2nd coming liturgy? If we're waiting for humanity to respond to the opportunity, what will it take for that to happen? [TPA: When we realise there is no alternative] TPA: What accounts then for the "20% of London and Bristol were caught up by Quakerism" in the 1650s? BPD: [The context: finding certainity and hope in a catastrophic situation] The contrast of "anyone can be saved" with much of what the other churches were saying. ----------TPA video 1---------- Luke: "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me" are Jesus's first public words. Thereafter we don't hear much about the Spirit, but the unspoken sub-text is, wrt Jesus himself: "Look at Jesus: This is what the Spirit-led life looks like". The Spirit gives a foretaste of what is to come... Paul describes the Apostles as 'Ambassadors of life in the Spirit'. Manifesting life in the Spirit as it was in Jesus, because they saw it in him. [Note that this makes Paul's claim to _be_ and Apostle a bit tenuous] Early Christian communities: spiritual families ('brother' and 'sister') Boundaries crossed/erased -- manifestations of the Spirit -- but a diversity of gifts. Their community life is manifesting what the Spirit is bringing and will bring. Revelation: taking away a veil, now, and coming. Normal way of seeing boundaries between e.g. classes is falling away, seeing things in new ways. Not a new set of teachings, but a new kind of perception [and of living?] Crunch time: how much can you rely on this? First conflict over the dietary laws. The Law vs. the new vision. Matthew keeps a strong place for the Law, Jesus as a teacher in the Jewish tradition (radical, but in the same tradition). Humanity is to be transformed, and continue, in the Spirit, (and so the whole of Creation is transformed). Luke has what Eden Grace described: "Creation waits with eager/anxious expectation" A sense of bringing to birth, with the attendant hint of anxiety. And we have the Spirit as midwife to the change: support with firmness Humanity refashioned not just in, but as, the image ('ikon') of God And this has to begin with a dying of the old form of life. "_I_ live no longer, but Christ lives in me" [Paul, somewhere] TPA (responding to SM): There's a _lot_ about newness in the NT, but it's almost all about people coming into a new understanding of what it is to be human, and not much about seeing the whole of creation in a new way, as early Friends would. PBD paraphrasing TPA (responding to BPD): Jesus's resurrection is the _beginning_ of the fulfillment of the prophesy of universal resurrection: "a justification that something major has begun, if if it hasn't been completed". TPA (responding so SM 42:10): Was it a time of constant upheaval, heavy oppresive behavious from the occupying Roman forces, etc.? A lot of scholarly debate pro and con on this. Ed Saunders (sp?) yes life was tough, harvests failed, but Roman rule was by-and-large _not_ obtrusive, and largely implemented through local intermediaries. BPD: Are the Gospels trying, as they tell it, to reconfigure what happened leading up to and in Jesus's crucifixion to fit with new sense of delay [in the Kingdom] [that they were experiencing 20/30 years later]? The coming of the Spirit to the Gentiles, which happened very quickly, was "the knock-down argument" that the coming resurrection was for _all_ people, not just the (people formerly known as the) Chosen of God. ==============Forum discussions========== I need to say something in this thread: https://moodle.woodbrooke.org.uk/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=14517 about (FK's reading of) Aquinas's approach to free will and Grace: not just us, not just God, but (a mystical union of) both... ---------TPA Video 2----------- Back to what is coming, that is heaven on earth, is understood as the transformation of humankind. So, not so much heaven on earth as heaven _in_ earth, 'in earthy stuff'. Ref. Phil. 2:5-8 5 In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus: 6 who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; 7 rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness. 8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death – even death on a cross! Ref. Genesis -- "made in the image of God" -- we can do this ourselves. Day of Atonement, in the Temple, in Jerusalem: the only day the High Priest goes in to the Holy of Holies. Wearing this-day-only vestments, with imagery of Creation and the Garden. In the forgiveness that follows, the whole of creation is restored to the purity of the Garden. The New Testament is usually approached (i.e. we 21st century folk were taught it) through and from the perspective of the later developments of the Christian Church. And of course that also has influenced how it is translated. As the community/communities of Early Christians grow and stabilise, external pressure on them grows, which in turn leads to a need to have an account of their origins that's coherent and reliable, which in turn leads to downplaying e.g. the early internal frictions, even as the New Testament is still being written... At first there's a lot of flexibility, stories, metaphors, adaptations of the Hebrew scriptures. But as the community gets more public, more confident, with more impact on the wider world, pressure from outside grows, which generates pressure within the community as to how they live in the world, what must be held on to and what can change to accommodate to outside pressure... And so a structure of authority and reliable doctrine emerges *Quakers: three keys to unlock what was happening in earliest Christianity* 1) *The living word* 'This is the word of the Lord' But in the NT, 'the word of the Lord' does _not_ mean Scripture. As in the OT, it is something that comes to _people_, in the OT the prophets, in the NT the new Christians themselves. Ref. Hebrews, quoting Jeremiah 31:31-34, several times. This is the longest quote of the OT in the NT: "The days are surely coming..." 31 The days are surely coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. 32 It will not be like the covenant that I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt—a covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, says the Lord. 33 But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 No longer shall they teach one another, or say to each other, "Know the Lord," for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, says the Lord; for I will forgive their iniquity, and remember their sin no more. [NRSV https://www.biblestudytools.com/nrs/] Central to early Christian understanding (note reference to a "new covenant", as in the blessing at the Last Supper). Hebrews 4:7 O that today you would hear his voice, harden not your hearts [TPA] Hebrews 4:12 Indeed, the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing until it divides soul from spirit, joints from marrow; it is able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart. [NRSV] Hebrews 6:4 ... those who have once been enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, (5) and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, Hebrews 12:22-25 22 But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to innumerable angels in festal gathering, 23 and to the assembly of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and to God the judge of all, and to the spirits of the righteous made perfect, 24 and to Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood that speaks a better word than the blood of Abel. 25 See that you do not refuse the one who is speaking [NRSV] 2) *Jesus: how do you recognise the living word, the true prophet?* A sharpness in the way Luke talks about Jesus, particularly the way in which he says you have to see things differently: the old ways of recognition are not capable of seeing the new thing that is emerging. Unless you change, you will not perceive Prompting people into a new way of seeing -- not about ethics in Luke, about how to live... Luke 7:18--21 - questions about John; how can this man be a prophet -- what we you looking to _see_ when you went out to the desert to find John? You get it wrong: John is mad, I'm a drunkard. [those are the old ways of seeing]. At the end [7:35] "Wisdom is justified [vindicate] by [all] her children". [NRSV] Parable of the Sower explained: "The seed is the word" [8:11]. "Then pay attention to how you listen; for to those who have, more will be given; and from those who do not have, even what they seem to have will be taken away" [8:18] Who are my mother and my brothers? "My mother and my brothers are those who hear the word of the Lord and do it." [8:21] 3) *All the faithful may prophecy* Pentecost 1 Corinthians 14: 29 Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others weigh what is said. 30 If a revelation is made to someone else sitting nearby, let the first person be silent. 31 For you can all prophesy one by one, so that all may learn and all be encouraged. 32 And the spirits of prophets are subject to the prophets, [NRSV] Listen with the same spirit as what is being said... The priesthood of all the faithful 1 Peter 2: 9 But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, Doesn't last: ref. pressures above, _and_ conflict within[/between] the communities, bishops 'overseers' and deacons 'servants' emerge by the end of the NT era. Prophecy is unpredictable, elusive: importance of community in discernment, emerging in Paul, prophetic testing, what builds up the community. ----- The problem of discernment emerges: The development of the Spirit-led life, but Which of the developments are distortions, which are truly spirit-led Pause at [38:05]