Mercurial > hg > rsof
view MHMC/majk_2024-11-08.txt @ 567:a18025e2f032
done
author | Henry Thompson <ht@markup.co.uk> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 08 Nov 2024 05:21:39 -0500 |
parents | 59c803c451d0 |
children | da2a78c1b6b0 |
line wrap: on
line source
KM welcomed us to a meeting to support Majk Stokes after the outcome of the appointment process. KM invited Majk to share how he was feeling. Assistant Manager for 12 years, and Acting Manager for 4 months, promotion was the obvious next step. 'New perspective?' Discounts all the hard work and experience, counted against to me Still quite raw. Delay in email at the time. Signalled interest in the job at the beginning of the summer, wasn't given any help or feedback at all.> -------- KM: Full and open procedure, equal treatment: In the end panel choose more depth and breadth of experience in person management and venue management. Giving feedback even now, panel hopes is useful going forewords. Personal feedback should have happened right away, you were owed that, and the panel apologises. Absence of Majk's line manager meant the person normally responsible for helping him wasn't there, and MC failed to step in and do that job. JP: New perspective? Something you were looking for? No, not going in, it was something that emerged in the interview process. Coming into a new situation allows new ideas _But_ new perspective wasn't the starting point, or the primary point. M&B interviewed very well, but so did the other candidates. We had a very hard time making the decision. Majk still struggling to see why he and Beth couldn't have done this as well or better. And it now looks like I'm being pushed back to Ass't Mgr and showing how everything works, that's hard to take. Delay in panel response was bad, but it was _very_ hard to reply in writing. Agreed that retaining Acting pay for the first month a reasonable request. Forward: Miranda changed to not being paid for lunch break Like to go down to a two-day week. Three monhts in? Start in January better? Like to have a more environmental or creative focus: recycling/energy efficiency aspect perhaps. C-venues were a mess, they don't learn from their mistakes, Greenside would have been a better bet, make my job more about planning for and managing "Venue 40", that would be much more satisfying. That's obviously a whole conversation to be ha So having a project, taking the lead on something, for example V40 or environmental, that would be great. RF: New managers would be really excited to hear that. Easy to lose sight of the environmental stuff, so having someone actually pushing that on staff will also this is a great time to get that going. Sabbatical? Maybe... Beth's thoughts? Not the historical connection, so not the same emotional investment, angry on Majk's behalf. Would have found ways to do the job well. Not here because this meeting is for Majk, looking at other avenues for new work. [Beth not interested in pursuing the casual post] There's an open door for further discussion. M proposes to support S&A for up to 3 months, paid for it, go down to 2 days, considered for sabbatical. MC will get back to you ASAP. M will let S&A know that he applied for the job, but has no animus towards them personally. JP&MH are happy to continue to support.