Mercurial > hg > rsof
comparison MHMC/majk_2024-11-08.txt @ 567:a18025e2f032
done
author | Henry Thompson <ht@markup.co.uk> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 08 Nov 2024 05:21:39 -0500 |
parents | 59c803c451d0 |
children | da2a78c1b6b0 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
566:59c803c451d0 | 567:a18025e2f032 |
---|---|
1 KM welcomed us to a meeting to support Majk Stokes after the outcome | |
2 of the appointment process. | |
3 | |
4 KM invited Majk to share how he was feeling. | |
5 | |
6 Assistant Manager for 12 years, and Acting Manager for 4 months, | |
7 promotion was the obvious next step. | |
8 | |
9 'New perspective?' Discounts all the hard work and experience, counted against to me | |
10 | |
11 Still quite raw. | |
12 | |
13 Delay in email at the time. | |
14 | |
15 Signalled interest in the job at the beginning of the summer, wasn't | |
16 given any help or feedback at all.> | |
17 | |
18 -------- | |
19 | |
20 KM: Full and open procedure, equal treatment: In the end panel choose | |
21 more depth and breadth of experience in person management and venue | |
22 management. | |
23 | |
24 Giving feedback even now, panel hopes is useful going forewords. | |
25 | |
26 Personal feedback should have happened right away, you were owed that, | |
27 and the panel apologises. | |
28 | |
29 Absence of Majk's line manager meant the person normally responsible | |
30 for helping him wasn't there, and MC failed to step in and do that | |
31 job. | |
32 | |
33 JP: New perspective? Something you were looking for? No, not going | |
34 in, it was something that emerged in the interview process. | |
35 | |
36 Coming into a new situation allows new ideas | |
37 | |
38 _But_ new perspective wasn't the starting point, or the primary point. | |
39 | |
40 M&B interviewed very well, but so did the other candidates. We had a | |
41 very hard time making the decision. | |
42 | |
43 Majk still struggling to see why he and Beth couldn't have done this | |
44 as well or better. | |
45 | |
46 And it now looks like I'm being pushed back to Ass't Mgr and showing | |
47 how everything works, that's hard to take. | |
48 | |
49 Delay in panel response was bad, but it was _very_ hard to reply in | |
50 writing. Agreed that retaining Acting pay for the first month a | |
51 reasonable request. | |
52 | |
53 Forward: | |
54 | |
55 Miranda changed to not being paid for lunch break | |
56 | |
57 Like to go down to a two-day week. Three monhts in? Start in January | |
58 better? | |
59 | |
60 Like to have a more environmental or creative focus: recycling/energy | |
61 efficiency aspect perhaps. C-venues were a mess, they don't learn from | |
62 their mistakes, Greenside would have been a better bet, make my job | |
63 more about planning for and managing "Venue 40", that would be much | |
64 more satisfying. That's obviously a whole conversation to be ha | |
65 | |
66 So having a project, taking the lead on something, for example V40 or | |
67 environmental, that would be great. | |
68 | |
69 RF: New managers would be really excited to hear that. | |
70 | |
71 Easy to lose sight of the environmental stuff, so having someone | |
72 actually pushing that on staff will also this is a great time to get | |
73 that going. | |
74 | |
75 Sabbatical? Maybe... | |
76 | |
77 Beth's thoughts? | |
78 | |
79 Not the historical connection, so not the same emotional investment, | |
80 angry on Majk's behalf. Would have found ways to do the job well. | |
81 | |
82 Not here because this meeting is for Majk, looking at other avenues | |
83 for new work. | |
84 | |
85 [Beth not interested in pursuing the casual post] | |
86 | |
87 There's an open door for further discussion. | |
88 | |
89 M proposes to support S&A for up to 3 months, paid for it, go down to 2 days, | |
90 considered for sabbatical. | |
91 | |
92 MC will get back to you ASAP. | |
93 | |
94 M will let S&A know that he applied for the job, but has no animus | |
95 towards them personally. | |
96 | |
97 JP&MH are happy to continue to support. | |
98 |