diff 7vt/fmh_2009-02-08.html @ 9:1cbbaa5a0684

as sent out
author ht
date Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:32:24 -0500
parents
children babbcab08626
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/7vt/fmh_2009-02-08.html	Mon Feb 09 15:32:24 2009 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE html
+  PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta name="copyright" content="Copyright (C) 2007 Henry S. Thompson"/><meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/><style type="text/css">
+       pre.code {font-family: monospace}
+       pre {margin-left: 0em}
+       ul.nolabel { margin: 0; margin-left: -2.5em}
+       ul.naked li { list-style-type: none }
+       ol ol {list-style-type: lower-alpha}
+       .math {font-family: 'Arial Unicode MS', 'Lucida Sans Unicode', serif}
+       .sub {font-size: 80%; vertical-align: sub}
+       .termref {text-decoration: none; color: #606000}
+       div.toc h2 {font-size: 120%; margin-top: 0em; margin-bottom: 0em}
+       div.toc h4 {font-size: 100%; margin-top: 0em; margin-bottom: 0em;
+                   margin-left: 1em}
+       div.toc h1 {font-size: 140%; margin-bottom: 0em}
+       div.toc ul {margin-top: 1ex}
+       .byline {font-size: 120%}
+       div.figure {margin-left: 2em}
+       div.caption {font-style: italic; font-weight: bold}
+     </style><title>Future of 7 VT working group:  Fourth meeting</title></head><body style="font-family: DejaVu Sans, Arial; background: rgb(254,250,246); font-size: 12pt; width: 20cm; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto">
+ <div style="text-align: center">
+  <h1>Future of 7 VT working group:  Fourth meeting</h1>
+  <div class="byline">This informal summary by Henry S. Thompson, Convenor</div>
+  <div class="byline">Held at 7 Victoria Terrace, Edinburgh on 8 February 2009, 7:30 p.m.</div>
+ </div>
+ 
+  <div>
+   <h2>1.  Attendance</h2>
+   <p>Present: Alison Burnley, Anthony Buxton, Madeleine Harding, Ken Jobling, Phil Lucas,
+ Brian Mayes, Laurie Naumann, Rufus Reade,
+Eileen Schott, Henry Thompson (in the clerk's chair)</p>
+  </div>
+  <div>
+   <h2>2.  Input from the co-Manager</h2>
+   <p>Looking back, at the time of the original purchase, of the projected
+250,000 GBP spend planned for upgrading the building only 150,000 GBP
+was spent, and again in 1993 a review suggested some major work which wasn't done.</p>
+   <p>Lettings have gone down this year because of the loss of two major lettings: The Traverse, who
+moved to their own premises; and the City of Edinburgh, who have cut back on external training. 
+Prospects this year don't look great on that front.</p>
+   <p>At interview, we were asked to "be a Quaker presence", and that's what we
+try to do.  Our day begins at 0745, and the Meeting
+House is often open until 2130 or 2200.  Sue and Anthony average about 60hrs/week, although only
+contracted for 37.5.</p>
+   <p>Staff costs increased this year in part because of the necessity of allowing for holiday pay for
+part-time staff (in arrears).</p>
+   <p>The Buxtons' vision for 7VT is as a centre for Quakers in Edinburgh or even in Scotland.  The
+increase in visibility we have worked for is part of this:  making the entry to the ground floor and
+the Festival Cafe more evidently Quaker.</p>
+   <p>The Festival venue doesn't actually net any money: we're closed for six weeks as far as bookings
+is concerned -- if we were not a venue, we <i>might</i> get income from e.g. rehersal space
+lettings.  So overall we lose money for that six weeks, even though staff costs are lower, as we have four
+venue managers (Sue, Anthony, Tom and Tam [as convenor of the Festival C'ttee], one of whom is always
+on duty.  Only when Tam is on do we have staff cover as well.</p>
+   <p>The cooking involved in the Festival Cafe has provoked the food hygiene changes, and are leading to the upgrade.  For tea and
+coffee only, we could do without the kitchen upgrade.  A redesign there would enable a new letting
+space.</p>
+   <p>The kitchen upgrade is currently estimated at 30KGBP, the toilets 50KGBP.  Replacing the cookers
+means adding ventolation, all stainless-steel.  Decomination requires pressure hoses, with more impact.</p>
+   <p>The kitchen does not play much into the lettings business, that is, not having a kitchen would
+not have much if any impact on the lettings.  Anyone who wants lunch has a buffet (usually cold)
+catered in.  The refreshment business is for teas and coffees.</p>
+   <p>Cooking is crucial watershed: the "no kitchen" option would still allow dishwasher(s) and fridge(s).</p>
+   <p>Alternatively, consider running a cafe continuously during the year.  This would of course have
+an impact on the library.</p>
+   <p>We are hopeful that the Victoria Terrace pavement will be re-opened
+through to George the IVth Bridge by around Easter.</p>
+   <p>Opening up access to the creche directly from the library would be about 5KGBP, we could also
+look at breaking the internal wall down, adding built-in cupboards and a window.</p>
+   <p>The toilets refit is aiming for five lady's cubicles (plus basins), two cubicles and two urinals for the men's</p>
+   <p>Basic fabric and roof are in good state.  The windows are pending.  The hall is in good state,
+and proving attractive to lettings.</p>
+   <p>The meetingroom itself has access issues wrt catering, and we have been trying to get most
+catering done on the 1st floor -- not all groups like this.  There is no water
+or drainage on that side of the building.</p>
+   <p>The windows project: it should be possible to get double-glazed vertically-hinged windows in the
+Meeting Room and Hall, which
+would mean we could get rid of the secondary windows and have proper ventolation.  We're hoping to have
+this redesign done soon so that if we must do </p>
+   <p>We could service/manage more letting with existing staffing levels if we had more rooms.</p>
+   <p>Heating bill for the whole building was about 8KGBP last year, some heaters lack local
+thermostats.  Solar or roof-based heat exchanger might be possible.  No costings are available for this.</p>
+   <p>Fire regulations are now becoming an issue:  strictly speaking the maximum occupancy of rooms
+above a single staircase is 60.  A safe refuge for wheelchair uses and lift sealing are also in the offing.</p>
+   <p>The overall regulatory situation means anytime we do anything, we now have to do it to the top
+standard demanded by fire, safety, health etc. regulations.  We are sometimes put in a difficult
+position by this, for example, with respect to young Quaker residential groups, to whom strictly
+speaking we should be saying "no".  If we break the rules, and an accident happens, we will be in
+serious trouble.</p>
+   <p>Staffing: Tom does 3 days a week, one of which is maintenance, and he
+covers for Friday (Managers' day off) and holidays.  There are a further eight
+0-hours contract staff who fill the rest on an <i>ad-hoc</i> basis.  We
+do lose money if we open the building for just one group who are only using the
+Bow Room, for which the charity rate is 10GBP/hour.</p>
+   <p>The recession may be having an impact, with things quite quiet since
+Christmas, except for some weeks when we are over-subscribed.  Wednesday is the
+busiest day of the week, somewhat hampered by midweek Meeting.</p>
+   <p>We can't compete with the big hotels and conference centres, and we don't
+try.  Our primary lettors come from the voluntary sector.  Although they have
+been hit by the recession, and the shrinkage of Lottery funding consequent on
+the Olympics, we are looking at some hopeful prospects as well.</p>
+   <p>We do have some groups with whom we have long-standing regular bookings, although not in the form
+of say an annual contracts -- there are weekly discounts.</p>
+   <p>6VT have enquired about letting the Bow Room on a long-term basis.</p>
+   <p>We're not in a position (as say Dundee is) to do commercial lettings of a part of the building.</p>
+   <p>Possible comparators: The Methodist Church in Nicholson Square; St. Mary's RC Cathedral</p>
+   <p>We are now considered a "Quaker Centre".  Manchester, Liverpool, York,
+Sheffield, Manchester, Swarthmore, Woodbrooke, Oxford (but they don't come to
+the meetings convened to discuss common issues) are
+others.  We are the only one in Scotland.  Glasgow and Dundee do some lettings, but without the overall
+approach of a Centre.</p>
+   <p>There are still ways we could be making more of the building, more signage, more window displays.
+We don't have a permanent place for worship, which is unfortunate.  Not enough use is being made of the
+Meeting House <i>by and for Quakers</i>.</p>
+   <p>Trading Company to run the business: Friends House have done that, the Priory Rooms (Poole
+Street, Birmingham) have done this.  Anthony would not like to go that way:
+there is real tension in Poole Street, for instance, between the needs of the
+AM and the business.</p>
+   <p>Dundee Property Trust own the tenement with the Dundee Meeting House, and the property agent
+on the ground floor.  Laurie Naumann has just become a trustee.</p>
+   <p>Deciding what the right funding/ownership/management model is depends on
+what footprint we want, whether we want a presence or just a venue for Meeting
+for Worship. 
+Setting up a trading company when we're running at a deficit seems like a non-starter.</p>
+   <p>Why aren't we running more Quaker study groups here? Why aren't more of our members doing more of
+their Quaker-related business here? Our regular bookings do stop us being adventurous: we could have
+had the whole Middle-Eastern festival here, if we hadn't had the load of our ongoing bookings.  We
+could change the way we do bookings, shift from regular slots to blocks.</p>
+  </div>
+  <div>
+   <h2>3.  Input from the Convenor of Fabric and Maintenance
+C'ttee</h2>
+   <p>Ken is a Trustee as well.  Trustees have decided that no major spending commitments can be made
+(except for urgent matters) until this Working Group has reported and AM has come to some conclusions. 
+This puts real pressure on getting recommendations and decisions out of this review exercise as quickly
+as possible.</p>
+   <p>Trustees have passed two things as matters of priority to F&amp;M:</p>
+   <ul>
+    <li> ongoing roof access above the flat (e.g. wrt
+gutters);</li>
+    <li>priorities arising from the quinquennial review, i.e. things which had to be done very soon, for
+example some of the West windows.</li>
+   </ul>
+   <p>At a Quaker Centres meeting last week we heard many similar stories to what Anthony said above.</p>
+   <p>The possibility of establishing some official Scotland GM use of building was explored in 1995.  The
+operation of Quaker Link Scotland from 7VT also happened around then.  The appointment of an admin.
+assistant to GM was at first thought of as feeding into this, but partly because of the IVS lease on
+the Bow Room, and partly because of opposition from elsewhere in GM, nothing came of it.</p>
+   <p>There is a danger of getting bogged down in costs, while losing sight of the benefits of the place.</p>
+   <p>We have been running on low reserves since, roughly, the establishment of the Kelso Meeting
+House.  We can't look at the Meeting House in isolation.</p>
+   <p>Other Quaker Centres have emphasised the need to have a clear vision in service of which the
+financial plans are framed.</p>
+  </div>
+  <div>
+   <h2>4.  Questionnaires</h2>
+   <p>Anthony was dismayed at the questionnaire which was headed for lettings, at a time when the
+client base is delicate, indeed frightened that it might scare people off.  None of the questionnaires
+included anything about who the group is and what our remit is, or included the question of vision. 
+Eileen mentioned that the goal was to find out more about what made people come
+back, or not.  Anthony pointed out that there
+already is a satisfaction evaluation for letting clients.</p>
+   <p>Brian suggested that the timing might be better once we have a better sense of what path we are
+going down.</p>
+   <p>Anthony thought that asking about alternative visions is the best way to get people's input.</p>
+   <p>Anthony recommended only having <i>one</i> questionnaire, so that the results are
+comparable.  Alison agreed that many of the questions should be the same, but the some questions were
+only appropriate for some groups.</p>
+  </div>
+  <div>
+   <h2>5.  Future topics</h2>
+   <p>Need a tour of the building, next time (when Rufus is here).</p>
+   <p>Developing alternative visions</p>
+  </div>
+  <div>
+   <h2>6.  Next Meeting</h2>
+   <p>Our next meeting will be on Sunday 22 February, 7:30 p.m. at 7 Victoria
+Terrace.  We have tentatively set Sunday 8 March, same time and venue, for the
+meeting after that.</p>
+  </div>
+ 
+</body></html>
\ No newline at end of file