117
|
1 <?xml version='1.0'?>
|
|
2 <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../../lib/xml/doc.xsl" ?>
|
|
3 <!DOCTYPE doc SYSTEM "../../lib/xml/doc.dtd" >
|
137
|
4 <doc xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
|
117
|
5 <head>
|
|
6 <title>Not a notion but a way</title>
|
|
7 <author>Henry S. Thompson</author>
|
138
|
8 <date>9 January 2018</date>
|
137
|
9 <style>.bib p {clear: right; float: right; width: 75%; margin-top: 0pt}
|
|
10 .bib name {display: inline-block}
|
|
11 .bib div {clear: both}</style>
|
117
|
12 </head>
|
|
13 <body>
|
|
14 <div>
|
|
15 <title>Introduction</title>
|
137
|
16 <p><emph>God, words and us</emph> <link href="#hr">[Rowlands 2017]</link> is a good thing to have done,
|
117
|
17 thoughtful, worth reading but, for me, ultimately disappointing, an opportunity
|
|
18 missed. Maybe focussing on the language that divides us was necessary, and the
|
|
19 light this book shines on the nature of that division, what is and isn't
|
|
20 important about it, is valuable. But it feels to me that it got trapped by its
|
|
21 own success and never got past a fundamental assumption which guaranteed its
|
125
|
22 eventual limitations.</p>
|
117
|
23 <p>The key, mistaken, assumption is that what we need to talk about as
|
|
24 Quakers is what we <emph>believe</emph> (or don't believe). There are a few
|
|
25 oblique mentions of alternatives in the book, but it's almost all about belief.
|
125
|
26 That's not the right way to look for what unites us as Quakers. After all,
|
117
|
27 we've all heard it said, indeed many of us have said ourselves, that the
|
120
|
28 <emph>single</emph> thing we can confidently say unites the membership of
|
125
|
29 Britain Yearly Meeting is that when we can we go to
|
|
30 Meeting for Worship. Our identity is not determined by what we
|
117
|
31 believe, but by what we <emph>do</emph>.</p>
|
|
32 <p>If you only look at the language of belief, you miss a whole different
|
|
33 way of looking at religious identity. Choices with respect to the language of
|
125
|
34 belief are what distinguish many, even most, Christian denominations, but
|
|
35 that's something Quakers have stood aside from: we don't do creeds. And,
|
|
36 importantly, we're not the only religion that isn't best understood in terms of
|
|
37 belief. Acknowledging this points us towards a better way to distinguish
|
|
38 ourselves, by shifting the focus from belief to practice, from
|
117
|
39 ortho<emph>doxy</emph> to ortho<emph>praxy</emph>.</p>
|
137
|
40 <p>I don't claim originality in suggesting this: John Punshon <link href="#jp">[Punshon 1987]</link> pretty much writes exactly this, and I think it's at the heart
|
125
|
41 of what Ben Pink Dandelion has been writing and saying for some time.</p>
|
117
|
42 </div>
|
|
43 <div>
|
|
44 <title>We already know this</title>
|
125
|
45 <p>Some well-known phrases illustrate the point:</p>
|
117
|
46 <list type="naked">
|
|
47 <item>Let your life speak</item>
|
|
48 <item>Be patterns, be examples</item>
|
|
49 <item>A testimony to the grace of God as shown in the life of ...</item>
|
118
|
50 <item>A humble learner in the school of Christ</item>
|
117
|
51 <item>[For Quakers] Christianity is not a notion, but a way</item>
|
|
52 <item>As Friends we commit ourselves to a way of worship</item>
|
|
53 <item>Come regularly to meeting for worship</item>
|
118
|
54 <item>... in the manner of Friends</item>
|
|
55 <item>Swear not at all</item>
|
|
56 <item>Live simply</item>
|
137
|
57 <item>[A]lleviate suffering and seek positive social change</item>
|
118
|
58 <item>[L]ive in the virtue of that life and power that takes away the occasion of all wars</item>
|
117
|
59 </list>
|
|
60 <p>And an old family story:</p>
|
|
61 <list type="defn">
|
|
62 <item term="visitor">Are you a Christian?</item>
|
|
63 <item term="host">[pause] You'll have to ask my neighbour</item>
|
|
64 </list>
|
118
|
65 <p>This emphasis on what we <emph>do</emph> as Quakers puts us, according to
|
125
|
66 Karen Armstrong, in line with the origins of the great monotheist religions:</p>
|
118
|
67 <display><p>"Religion as defined by the great sages of India, China, and the Middle East was not a notional activity but a practical one; it did not require belief in a set of doctrines but rather hard, disciplined work..."</p>
|
137
|
68 <p><link href="#ka">[Armstrong 2000]</link></p></display>
|
118
|
69 <p>Armstrong suggests that contemporary Judaism and Islam have retained
|
|
70 their original self-definitions centred on orthopraxy ("uniformity of religious
|
|
71 practice"), whereas Christian denominations in the
|
|
72 main have shifted much more towards defining themselves in terms of orthodoxy ("correct belief").</p>
|
|
73 <p>It's not surprising that, surrounded as we are by churches for whom
|
|
74 orthodoxy is fundamental, as well as strident parodies of all religious people
|
|
75 as little better (indeed more dangerous) than flat-earthers, we should have
|
125
|
76 fallen into adopting their language for our own internal discourse. But once
|
|
77 we're <emph>aware</emph> of that, we can choose to step away.</p>
|
118
|
78 </div>
|
|
79 <div>
|
125
|
80 <title>"And this [we know] experimentally"</title>
|
119
|
81 <p>But, what does that have to do with us, you may well ask? All that old
|
|
82 language may be all very well, and give us a warm feeling of in-group-ness when
|
|
83 we hear it, but what does it actually amount to here and now? It may be
|
|
84 interesting in an intellectual sense to hear that historical Christianity and
|
|
85 contemporary Judaism were/are founded on practice, but we're not about water
|
125
|
86 baptism or attending Mass or circumcision or keeping kosher. What's so special
|
119
|
87 about Meeting for Worship that it can sustain us in unity, preserve the
|
|
88 effectiveness of our business method and allow our disagreements about belief
|
|
89 language to be recognised without fear?</p>
|
120
|
90 <p>It's simple, really. In Meeting for Worship, on a good day, we
|
119
|
91 experience two things: a presence and a possibility. That's why we keep
|
|
92 coming back, because at some level we know we need to keep having that experience.</p>
|
|
93 <p>What presence? The technical term for it is 'transcendence'. We're not very good at talking about it. We refer to a
|
|
94 "gathered" meeting. We say "Meeting for Worship is not just meditation". We
|
|
95 know it when it happens. It's
|
|
96 elusive, and if we try to pin it down we lose it, that feeling that we are
|
|
97 joined with one another into something more than just our physical co-location.
|
|
98 Accepting that it is "not just me" isn't easy in the resolutely individualistic
|
|
99 culture we live in today, but if there is one item of faith we
|
|
100 <emph>must</emph> confess, at least to one another, it is the truth of that
|
|
101 experience, joining with and encouraged by 350 years of history and hundreds of
|
|
102 Meetings around the world today.</p>
|
|
103 <p>What possibility? The technical term for it is 'immanence'. We see and
|
|
104 hear it in the witness of those around
|
|
105 us: the possibility of living an inspired life. We <emph>recognise</emph> it
|
|
106 most vividly in Meeting for Worship, when we hear authentic ministry, 'authentic' because it comes from someone
|
120
|
107 we know is speaking as they live. It cannot be be faked, it is unmistakable,
|
119
|
108 terrifying and uplifting in equal measure. It
|
|
109 calls us to what we aspire to. It is at once daunting (how can I possibly do
|
125
|
110 what they do) and reassuring (it is possible). These are not historical
|
|
111 figures, not contemporary celebrities, not
|
|
112 distant missionaries: they are each <emph>one of us</emph>.</p>
|
119
|
113 <p>Whole books have been written about both of these, I have barely scratched
|
125
|
114 the surface. The point is simply that <emph>this</emph> is what we need most to
|
119
|
115 be talking about, and we don't need to agree about the <emph>words</emph> in
|
|
116 order to get started, we just have to acknowledge that there is a shared
|
|
117 <emph>experience</emph> that matters, deeply, to us, and that its reality and
|
|
118 its significance are <emph>not</emph> compromised by our unsatisfactory
|
|
119 attempts to talk about it.</p>
|
118
|
120 </div>
|
|
121 <div>
|
|
122 <title>There's nothing wrong with talking about belief</title>
|
125
|
123 <p>It's natural to want to dig in to <emph>why</emph> we do what we do, and
|
|
124 belief language inevitably creeps in to this, precisely <emph>because</emph> we're not sure of ourselves. And
|
118
|
125 it's not surprising that we struggle to come up with agreed answers. The key
|
|
126 point to hold on to is <emph>that doesn't undermine the validity of the
|
|
127 doings</emph>. Or, rather, it only undermines our faith if we <emph>let</emph>
|
|
128 it. If we restricted ourselves to only doing things if we understood why they
|
|
129 worked, we'd have very little left. And, as the previous section tried to
|
125
|
130 explain, we know that what we do <emph>does</emph> work for us. So sure, keep trying
|
118
|
131 to figure out why. But meantime, keep cheerfully practicing.</p>
|
117
|
132 </div>
|
137
|
133 <div class="bib">
|
|
134 <title>References</title>
|
|
135 <x:div><name>[Armstrong 2000]</name><p id="ka"> Armstrong, Karen, <emph>The Case for
|
|
136 God</emph>. Knopf, New York, 2000.</p></x:div>
|
|
137 <x:div><name>[Punshon 1987]</name><p id="jp"> Punshon, John, <emph>Encounters with silence: reflections
|
|
138 from the Quaker tradition</emph>, pp. 44–45. Quaker Home Service,
|
|
139 London, 1987. Also Friends United Press,
|
|
140 Richmond Indiana, 2006. As quoted in <emph>Quaker
|
|
141 Faith and Practice</emph>, The Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of
|
|
142 Friends (Quakers) in Britain, 1995. Available online at <link href="https://qfp.quaker.org.uk/passage/20-18/">QF&P 20.18</link></p></x:div>
|
|
143 <x:div><name>[Rowlands 2017]</name><p id="hr"> Rowlands, Helen ed. <emph>God, words and
|
|
144 us</emph>. Quaker Books, London, 2017.</p></x:div>
|
|
145
|
|
146 </div>
|
117
|
147 </body>
|
|
148 </doc>
|