Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta

view etc/toolbar/cut-cap-xx.xpm @ 5296:d185fa593d5f last-version-with-netinstall

Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
Specify ERROR_ME_WARN explicitly in specifier_instance_from_inst_list(). src/ChangeLog 2010-10-25 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * specifier.c (specifier_instance_from_inst_list): Call call_with_suspended_errors() with ERROR_ME_WARN, explicitly; avoids the problem Giacomo Boffi describes in http://mid.gmane.org/19617.52517.341117.388679@aiuole.stru.polimi.it , but the specifier instantiation bug that makes XEmacs fail for him is still visible.
author Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
date Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:57:37 +0100
parents 376386a54a3c
children 7910031dd78a
line wrap: on
line source

/* XPM */
static char * cut[] = {
"33 33 4 1",
"X	c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor",
"o	c Gray60",
"O	c Gray90",
"+	c white",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXooXXXooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXooXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXXXX",
"XXXXXoXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXooOOooXXXXX",
"XXXXXooXXXXXoooXXXXXooOOooXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXooXXXoooooXXXoooooXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooooXXXooooooXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXo+oXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooooXXXooooooXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXooXXXoooooXXXoooooXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXooXXXXXoooXXXXXooOOooXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXoXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXooOOooXXXXX",
"XXXXXooXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXooXXXooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXoXXXoXoXoXoooXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXoXXXoXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXooXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};