Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
view etc/toolbar/file-up.xpm @ 5105:d76a51b29d91
fix Stephen's bug with frame sizing
-------------------- ChangeLog entries follow: --------------------
src/ChangeLog addition:
2010-03-05 Ben Wing <ben@xemacs.org>
* frame.c:
* frame.c (Fframe_pixel_height):
* frame.c (Fframe_displayable_pixel_height):
* frame.c (Fframe_pixel_width):
* frame.c (Fframe_displayable_pixel_width):
* frame.c (Fset_frame_pixel_height):
* frame.c (Fset_frame_displayable_pixel_height):
* frame.c (Fset_frame_pixel_width):
* frame.c (Fset_frame_displayable_pixel_width):
* frame.c (get_frame_char_size):
* frame.c (change_frame_size_1):
Make it so that `frame-pixel-height', `set-frame-pixel-height', etc.
use updated values for the displayable or total pixel size that
will reflect what will happen as of the next redisplay. This
basically means using the character-cell height and converting
on-the-fly to pixel units. In the process, make sure FRAME_CHARWIDTH/
FRAME_CHARHEIGHT are always correct and change
get_frame_char_size() to simply use them; the old logic in that
function was inlined into change_frame_size_1(), which is the only
place that needs the logic.
author | Ben Wing <ben@xemacs.org> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:01:04 -0600 |
parents | 376386a54a3c |
children | 7910031dd78a |
line wrap: on
line source
/* XPM */ static char * file[] = { "28 28 4 1", "X c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor", "o c black", "O c white", "+ c Gray60", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXooooooooooXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOooXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOo+oXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOo++oXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOoooooXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXooooooooooooooXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};