Fix various small issues with the multiple-value implementation. lisp/ChangeLog addition: 2009-08-31 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * byte-optimize.el (byte-optimize-form-code-walker): Be careful about discarding multiple values when optimising #'prog1 calls. (byte-optimize-or): Preserve any trailing nil, as this is a supported way to explicitly discard multiple values. (byte-optimize-cond-1): Discard multiple values with a singleton followed by no more clauses. * bytecomp.el (progn): (prog1): (prog2): Be careful about discarding multiple values in the byte-hunk handler of these three forms. * bytecomp.el (byte-compile-prog1, byte-compile-prog2): Don't call #'values explicitly, use `(or ,(pop form) nil) instead, since that compiles to bytecode, not a funcall. * bytecomp.el (byte-compile-values): With one non-const argument, byte-compile to `(or ,(second form) nil), not an explicit #'values call. * bytecomp.el (byte-compile-insert-header): Be nicer in the error message to emacs versions that don't understand our bytecode. src/ChangeLog addition: 2009-08-31 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * eval.c (For, Fand): Don't declare val as REGISTER in these functions, for some reason it breaks the non-DEBUG union build. These functions are only called from interpreted code, the performance implication doesn't matter. Thank you Robert Delius Royar! * eval.c (Fmultiple_value_list_internal): Error on too many arguments. tests/ChangeLog addition: 2009-08-31 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * automated/lisp-tests.el (Assert-rounding): Remove an overly-verbose failure message here. Correct a couple of tests which were buggy in themselves. Add three new tests, checking the behaviour of #'or and #'and when passed zero arguments, and a Known-Bug-Expect-Failure call involving letf and values. (The bug predates the C-level multiple-value implementation.)

/* XPM */
static char * last_win_xpm[] = {
"33 33 5 1",
"       c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor",
".      c Gray60",
"x      c white",
"y      c Gray90",
"z      c Gray60",
"                                 ",
"                  ...........    ",
"                  .zzzz.zzzz.    ",
"           ...........z.zzzz.    ",
"           .yyyy.yyyy.z.zzzz.    ",
"    ...........y.yyyy.z.zzzz.    ",
"    .xxxx.xxxx.y.yyyy.z.zzzz.    ",
"    .xxxx.xxxx.y.yyyy........    ",
"    .xxxx.xxxx.y.yyyy.z.zzzz.    ",
"    .xxxx.xxxx........z.zzzz.    ",
"    .xxxx.xxxx.y.yyyy.z.zzzz.    ",
"    ...........y.yyyy.z.zzzz.    ",
"    .xxxx.xxxx.y.yyyy.z.zzzz.    ",
"    .xxxx.xxxx.y.yyyy........    ",
"    .xxxx.xxxx.y.yyyy.           ",
"    .xxxx.xxxx........           ",
"    .xxxx.xxxx.                  ",
"    ...........                  ",
"                                 ",
"           ..                    ",
"         ...                     ",
"       ...................       ",
"         ...                     ",
"           ..                    ",
"               .           .     ",
" .             .                 ",
" .    ..   .. ...    . . . . ... ",
" .      . .    .     . . . . .  .",
" .    ...  ..  . ... . . . . .  .",
" .    . .   .  .      . .  . .  .",
" .... .. ...   .      . .  . .  .",
"                                 ",
"                                 "};