Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
view etc/toolbar/undo-cap-up.xpm @ 5036:9624523604c5
Use better types when ESCAPECHAR is specified, split_string_by_ichar_1
src/ChangeLog addition:
2010-02-19 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
* fns.c (split_string_by_ichar_1):
Use better types (e.g., not an Ichar for a buffer size) in this
function when dealing with ESCAPECHAR.
tests/ChangeLog addition:
2010-02-19 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
* automated/lisp-tests.el:
Change the #'split-string-by-char text to use US federal
government information instead of a couple of sentences from the
OED; the latter would probably have qualified as non-infringement,
but with the former the question won't arise.
(The German text in the same tests is from a very public domain
19th-century work.)
author | Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:46:53 +0000 |
parents | 3ecd8885ac67 |
children | 7910031dd78a |
line wrap: on
line source
/* XPM */ static char * undo[] = { "33 33 6 1", "X c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor", "u c #000000000000 s foregroundToolBarColor", "o c black", "O c Gray60", "+ c Gray90", "@ c white", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooOOooooXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooOOOOOOOOooXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooOOOOOOOOOooXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXoo++ooooOOOooOoXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXoo++++++++oooOOoXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXoo+++++++++oooOOOoXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoo+++++++++oo++oOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXoo++++++++oo+++oOooXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXo++oooo++oo+++++ooXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXo++++++oo+++++ooXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXo+++++++o++++ooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXo+++++++o++ooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXoo++++++o+ooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXX@@oooo++ooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXX@@@@@@ooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXX@@@@@@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXX@@@@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXX@@@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXX@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXuXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXuXXXuXXXXXXXXXuXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXuXXXuXuuuXXXuuuXXuuXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXuXXXuXuXXuXuXXuXuXXuXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXuXXXuXuXXuXuXXuXuXXuXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXuXXXuXuXXuXuXXuXuXXuXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXuuuXXuXXuXXuuuXXuuXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};