Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
view etc/toolbar/info-def-cap-xx.xpm @ 5036:9624523604c5
Use better types when ESCAPECHAR is specified, split_string_by_ichar_1
src/ChangeLog addition:
2010-02-19 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
* fns.c (split_string_by_ichar_1):
Use better types (e.g., not an Ichar for a buffer size) in this
function when dealing with ESCAPECHAR.
tests/ChangeLog addition:
2010-02-19 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
* automated/lisp-tests.el:
Change the #'split-string-by-char text to use US federal
government information instead of a couple of sentences from the
OED; the latter would probably have qualified as non-infringement,
but with the former the question won't arise.
(The German text in the same tests is from a very public domain
19th-century work.)
| author | Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> |
|---|---|
| date | Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:46:53 +0000 |
| parents | 376386a54a3c |
| children | 7910031dd78a |
line wrap: on
line source
/* XPM */ static char * info[] = { "33 33 2 1", "X c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor", "o c Gray60", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooooXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXooooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXoooooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooooXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXoooooooooXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoooXXoooXooXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoXXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoXXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoXXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoXXoXXoXXooXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};