view etc/toolbar/cut-cap-up.xpm @ 5036:9624523604c5

Use better types when ESCAPECHAR is specified, split_string_by_ichar_1 src/ChangeLog addition: 2010-02-19 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * fns.c (split_string_by_ichar_1): Use better types (e.g., not an Ichar for a buffer size) in this function when dealing with ESCAPECHAR. tests/ChangeLog addition: 2010-02-19 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * automated/lisp-tests.el: Change the #'split-string-by-char text to use US federal government information instead of a couple of sentences from the OED; the latter would probably have qualified as non-infringement, but with the former the question won't arise. (The German text in the same tests is from a very public domain 19th-century work.)
author Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
date Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:46:53 +0000
parents 3ecd8885ac67
children 7910031dd78a
line wrap: on
line source

/* XPM */
static char * cut[] = {
"33 33 4 1",
"X	c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor",
"o	c black s foregroundToolBarColor",
"O	c Gray90",
"+	c white",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXooXXXooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXooXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXXXX",
"XXXXXoXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXooOOooXXXXX",
"XXXXXooXXXXXoooXXXXXooOOooXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXooXXXoooooXXXoooooXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooooXXXooooooXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXo+oXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooooXXXooooooXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXooXXXoooooXXXoooooXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXooXXXXXoooXXXXXooOOooXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXoXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXooOOooXXXXX",
"XXXXXooXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXooXXXooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXoXXXoXoXoXoooXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXoXXXoXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXooXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};