Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
view etc/toolbar/cut-cap-up.xpm @ 5036:9624523604c5
Use better types when ESCAPECHAR is specified, split_string_by_ichar_1
src/ChangeLog addition:
2010-02-19 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
* fns.c (split_string_by_ichar_1):
Use better types (e.g., not an Ichar for a buffer size) in this
function when dealing with ESCAPECHAR.
tests/ChangeLog addition:
2010-02-19 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
* automated/lisp-tests.el:
Change the #'split-string-by-char text to use US federal
government information instead of a couple of sentences from the
OED; the latter would probably have qualified as non-infringement,
but with the former the question won't arise.
(The German text in the same tests is from a very public domain
19th-century work.)
author | Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:46:53 +0000 |
parents | 3ecd8885ac67 |
children | 7910031dd78a |
line wrap: on
line source
/* XPM */ static char * cut[] = { "33 33 4 1", "X c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor", "o c black s foregroundToolBarColor", "O c Gray90", "+ c white", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXooXXXooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXooXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXXXX", "XXXXXoXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXooOOooXXXXX", "XXXXXooXXXXXoooXXXXXooOOooXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXooXXXoooooXXXoooooXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoooooXXXooooooXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXo+oXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoooooXXXooooooXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXooXXXoooooXXXoooooXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXooXXXXXoooXXXXXooOOooXXXXXXX", "XXXXXoXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXooOOooXXXXX", "XXXXXooXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXXXX", "XXXXXXooXXXooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXXXoXoXoXoooXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXXXoXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXooXXoXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};