view etc/toolbar/copy-cap-xx.xpm @ 5036:9624523604c5

Use better types when ESCAPECHAR is specified, split_string_by_ichar_1 src/ChangeLog addition: 2010-02-19 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * fns.c (split_string_by_ichar_1): Use better types (e.g., not an Ichar for a buffer size) in this function when dealing with ESCAPECHAR. tests/ChangeLog addition: 2010-02-19 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * automated/lisp-tests.el: Change the #'split-string-by-char text to use US federal government information instead of a couple of sentences from the OED; the latter would probably have qualified as non-infringement, but with the former the question won't arise. (The German text in the same tests is from a very public domain 19th-century work.)
author Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
date Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:46:53 +0000
parents 376386a54a3c
children 7910031dd78a
line wrap: on
line source

/* XPM */
static char * copy[] = {
"33 33 4 1",
"X	c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor",
"o	c Gray60",
"O	c white",
"+	c Gray60",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoooooooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoOOOOOOOooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoOOOOOOOo+oXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoOoooooOooooXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoOooooOOOOOoXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoOOOOOoooooooooXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoOooOOoOOOOOOOooXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoOOOOOoOOOOOOOo+oXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoOOOOOoOoooooOooooXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoOOOOOoOooooOOOOOoXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoooooooOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoOoooooooOOoXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoOOOOOOOOOOoXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXooooooooooooXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoXXXoXXooXXoooXXoXXoXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoXXXXXoXXoXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoXXXXXoXXoXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoXXXoXoXXoXoXXoXXooXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoooXXXooXXoooXXXoXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXoXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};