view etc/toolbar/paste-cap-xx.xpm @ 4944:6af9b2e79451

Fixes to configure so --with-error-checking=yes works -------------------- ChangeLog entries follow: -------------------- ChangeLog addition: 2010-01-23 Ben Wing <ben@xemacs.org> * configure: * configure.ac (XE_COMPLEX_ARG): Expand the help for --with-debug to describe more specifically what exactly gets turned on. Expand the help for --with-error-checking to describe all the possible arguments, including `all', `none', `noFOO', multiple arguments, etc. Change so that `--with-error-checking' is the same as `--with-error-checking=all'. Currently, `--with-error-checking' has no effect at all! It just means "leave all error-checking for specific classes to their default values", which are "maybe", and get converted to "yes" or "no" depending on whether we are running a beta XEmacs.
author Ben Wing <ben@xemacs.org>
date Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:45:49 -0600
parents 376386a54a3c
children 7910031dd78a
line wrap: on
line source

/* XPM */
static char * paste[] = {
"33 33 5 1",
"X	c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor",
"o	c Gray60",
"O	c Gray90",
"+	c Gray60",
"@	c white",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoOOoXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXooooooOooOooooooXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++oOOOOOOo++++oXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo+++oooooooooo+++oXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++++++++++++++oXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++++++++++++++oXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++++++++++++++oXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++++++++++++++oXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++++oooooooooooXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++++o@@@@@@@@ooXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++++o@@@@@@@@o+oXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++++o@oooooo@ooooXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++++o@@@@@@@@@@@oXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++++o@oooo@@@@@@oXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++++o@@@@@@@@@@@oXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++++o@@@@@@@@@@@oXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXo++++++o@oooooooo@@oXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooooooo@@@@@@@@@@@oXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXo@@@@@@@@@@@oXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXo@@@@@@@@@@@oXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooooooooooXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoXXoXooXXXooXoooXoXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoXXoXXXoXoXXXXoXoXoXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooXXoooXXooXXoXoooXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoXXXXoXoXXXoXXoXoXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoXXXXooXoooXXXoXXooXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};