Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
view etc/toolbar/info-def-cap-up.xpm @ 4944:6af9b2e79451
Fixes to configure so --with-error-checking=yes works
-------------------- ChangeLog entries follow: --------------------
ChangeLog addition:
2010-01-23 Ben Wing <ben@xemacs.org>
* configure:
* configure.ac (XE_COMPLEX_ARG):
Expand the help for --with-debug to describe more specifically what
exactly gets turned on. Expand the help for --with-error-checking
to describe all the possible arguments, including `all', `none',
`noFOO', multiple arguments, etc.
Change so that `--with-error-checking' is the same as
`--with-error-checking=all'. Currently, `--with-error-checking' has
no effect at all! It just means "leave all error-checking for
specific classes to their default values", which are "maybe", and
get converted to "yes" or "no" depending on whether we are running
a beta XEmacs.
| author | Ben Wing <ben@xemacs.org> |
|---|---|
| date | Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:45:49 -0600 |
| parents | 3ecd8885ac67 |
| children | 7910031dd78a |
line wrap: on
line source
/* XPM */ static char * info[] = { "33 33 2 1", "X c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor", "o c black s foregroundToolBarColor", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooooXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXooooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXoooooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooooXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXoooooooooXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoooXXoooXooXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoXXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoXXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoXXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoXXoXXoXXooXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};