Be better about eliminating `block's that are not `return-from'd, bytecomp.el 2011-02-12 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * bytecomp.el: * bytecomp.el (byte-compile-initial-macro-environment): * bytecomp.el (unwind-protect): * bytecomp.el (byte-compile-active-blocks): * bytecomp.el (byte-compile-catch): * bytecomp.el ('return-from-1): Removed. * bytecomp.el ('block-1): Removed. * bytecomp.el (byte-compile-block-1): Removed. * bytecomp.el (byte-compile-return-from-1): Removed. * bytecomp.el (byte-compile-throw): * cl-macs.el (block): * cl-macs.el (return-from): In my last change, the elimination of `block's that were never `return-from'd didn't work if `cl-macroexpand-all' was called explicitly, something much code in cl-macs.el does. Change the implementation to something that doesn't require shadowing of the macros in `byte-compile-initial-macro-environment', putting a `cl-block-name' property on the gensym'd symbol argument to `catch' instead.

This directory tree holds version 21.5 of XEmacs.

The information in this file has been superseded by the XEmacs FAQ.

The easiest way to read the FAQ is to go to

http://www.xemacs.org/Documentation/21.5/html/xemacs-faq_1.html

You can also the local copy of the FAQ inside XEmacs by using
use Help->XEmacs FAQ from the menu, or `C-h F'.

If you don't have XEmacs running and can't access the web,
look directly at `man/xemacs-faq.texi' or `info/xemacs-faq.info'.