Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
view etc/toolbar/undo-cap-xx.xpm @ 5370:4c4b96b13f70
Address the easy test failures in tests/automated.
src/ChangeLog addition:
2011-03-11 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
* bytecode.c (optimize_byte_code):
Only transform assignments to keywords to Bdiscard if
NEED_TO_HANDLE_21_4_CODE is turned on. Cf. similar code in
reject_constant_symbols().
tests/ChangeLog addition:
2011-03-11 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
* automated/byte-compiler-tests.el:
(defconst :foo 1) now gives a warning when byte-compiled, check
for that.
(setq :foo 1) now errors with interpreted code, but succeeds with
byte-compiled code; check for the former, wrap a
Known-Bug-Expect-Failure around a check for the error in the
latter case, we can't yet remove this behaviour while we're using
packages compiled by 21.4.
* automated/lisp-tests.el (wrong-type-argument):
Integer zero is a valid argument to #'substring-no-properties, use
Assert not Check-Error for it. Check some other aspects of the
functionality of #'substring-no-properties in passing.
| author | Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> |
|---|---|
| date | Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:40:01 +0000 |
| parents | 376386a54a3c |
| children | 7910031dd78a |
line wrap: on
line source
/* XPM */ static char * undo[] = { "33 33 5 1", "X c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor", "o c Gray60", "O c Gray60", "+ c Gray90", "@ c white", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooOOooooXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooOOOOOOOOooXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooOOOOOOOOOooXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXoo++ooooOOOooOoXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXoo++++++++oooOOoXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXoo+++++++++oooOOOoXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoo+++++++++oo++oOOoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXoo++++++++oo+++oOooXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXo++oooo++oo+++++ooXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXo++++++oo+++++ooXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXo+++++++o++++ooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXo+++++++o++ooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXoo++++++o+ooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXX@@oooo++ooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXX@@@@@@ooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXX@@@@@@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXX@@@@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXX@@@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXX@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXoXXXoXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXoXXXoXoooXXXoooXXooXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXoXXXoXoXXoXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXoXXXoXoXXoXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXoXXXoXoXXoXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXoooXXoXXoXXoooXXooXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};