Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
view etc/toolbar/spell-up.xpm @ 5370:4c4b96b13f70
Address the easy test failures in tests/automated.
src/ChangeLog addition:
2011-03-11 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
* bytecode.c (optimize_byte_code):
Only transform assignments to keywords to Bdiscard if
NEED_TO_HANDLE_21_4_CODE is turned on. Cf. similar code in
reject_constant_symbols().
tests/ChangeLog addition:
2011-03-11 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
* automated/byte-compiler-tests.el:
(defconst :foo 1) now gives a warning when byte-compiled, check
for that.
(setq :foo 1) now errors with interpreted code, but succeeds with
byte-compiled code; check for the former, wrap a
Known-Bug-Expect-Failure around a check for the error in the
latter case, we can't yet remove this behaviour while we're using
packages compiled by 21.4.
* automated/lisp-tests.el (wrong-type-argument):
Integer zero is a valid argument to #'substring-no-properties, use
Assert not Check-Error for it. Check some other aspects of the
functionality of #'substring-no-properties in passing.
author | Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:40:01 +0000 |
parents | 376386a54a3c |
children | 7910031dd78a |
line wrap: on
line source
/* XPM */ static char * dict[] = { "28 28 6 1", "X c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor", "o c black", "O c Gray90", "+ c Gray40", "@ c Gray60", "# c white", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXoooooooooooooooooXXXXX", "XXXXXoXoOOOOOOOOOOOOO+oXXXXX", "XXXXXooooooooooooooooOoXXXXX", "XXXXoXo++o@@@@@@o+++oOoXXXXX", "XXXXXoo++o@@@@@@@o++oOoXXXXX", "XXXXXoo++o@@@@@@@@o+oOoXXXXX", "XXXXoXo++o@ooooooo@ooOoXXXXX", "XXXXXoo++o@o#####o@@oOoXXXXX", "XXXXXoo++o@ooooooo@@oOoXXXXX", "XXXXoXo++o@@@@@@@@@@oO###XXX", "XXXXXoo++o@ooooooo@@###++XXX", "XXXXXoo++o@@@@@@@@####+XXXXX", "XXXX#Xo++o@@@@@@####++oXXXXX", "XXX###o++o@@@@####++oOoXXXXX", "XX####o++o@@@####+@@oOoXXXXX", "XX+####++o@####++@@ooOoXXXXX", "XXX+####+o####+@@@o+oOoXXXXX", "XXXX+########+@@@o++oooXXXXX", "XXXXo+######+@@@o+++oXXXXXXX", "XXXXXo+####+oooooooooXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXX+##+XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXX++XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};