view etc/toolbar/replace-cap-up.xpm @ 5370:4c4b96b13f70

Address the easy test failures in tests/automated. src/ChangeLog addition: 2011-03-11 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * bytecode.c (optimize_byte_code): Only transform assignments to keywords to Bdiscard if NEED_TO_HANDLE_21_4_CODE is turned on. Cf. similar code in reject_constant_symbols(). tests/ChangeLog addition: 2011-03-11 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * automated/byte-compiler-tests.el: (defconst :foo 1) now gives a warning when byte-compiled, check for that. (setq :foo 1) now errors with interpreted code, but succeeds with byte-compiled code; check for the former, wrap a Known-Bug-Expect-Failure around a check for the error in the latter case, we can't yet remove this behaviour while we're using packages compiled by 21.4. * automated/lisp-tests.el (wrong-type-argument): Integer zero is a valid argument to #'substring-no-properties, use Assert not Check-Error for it. Check some other aspects of the functionality of #'substring-no-properties in passing.
author Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
date Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:40:01 +0000
parents 3ecd8885ac67
children 7910031dd78a
line wrap: on
line source

/* XPM */
static char * replace[] = {
"33 33 2 1",
"X	c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor",
"o	c black s foregroundToolBarColor",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXooXXXXooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXooXXXXooXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoXooXXXooXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoXooXXXoooooXXXoooXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoXXXooXXooXXXoXXooXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXooooooXXooXXXoXXoXoXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXoXXXXXooXooXXXoXXXXXoXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXoXXXXXooXoooooXXXXXXoXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXooooXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXooXXXoXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXoXoXXXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXooXXXXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXooooXXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXooXXXXXXXXooXXXoXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooooXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXoooXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXoXXoXXoXXoooXXoXooXXXooXXoXXXX",
"XXXoXXoXoXoXoXXoXoXXXoXoXXXoXoXXX",
"XXXoooXXoooXoXXoXoXoooXoXXXoooXXX",
"XXXoXXoXoXXXoXXoXoXoXoXoXXXoXXXXX",
"XXXoXXoXXooXoooXXoXooXoXooXXooXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};