view etc/ETAGS.EBNF @ 5911:48386fd60fd0

GMP functions that take doubles choke on non-finite values, avoid that. src/ChangeLog addition: 2015-05-10 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * floatfns.c (double_to_integer): Rename this from float_to_int to fit our newer, bignum-compatible terminology. GMP can signal SIGFPE when asked to turn NaN or infinity into a bignum, and we're not prepared to handle that signal if the OS float library routines don't do that, so check for those values explicitly. * floatfns.c (ceiling_two_float): * floatfns.c (ceiling_one_float): * floatfns.c (floor_two_float): * floatfns.c (floor_one_float): * floatfns.c (round_two_float): * floatfns.c (round_one_float): * floatfns.c (truncate_two_float): * floatfns.c (truncate_one_float): Call double_to_integer() with its new name. * number.c: Don't use the {bignum,ratio,bigfloat}_set_double functions directly here, with GMP they can choke when handed non-finite C doubles, call Ftruncate() and the new float_to_bigfloat() from floatfns.c. Maybe we should extend number-gmp.c with GMP-specific implementations that check for non-finite values. tests/ChangeLog addition: 2015-05-10 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * automated/lisp-tests.el: Backslash a few parentheses in the first column for the sake of fontification. * automated/lisp-tests.el: Check that the rounding functions signal Lisp errors correctly when handed positive and negative infinity and NaN.
author Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
date Sun, 10 May 2015 19:07:09 +0100
parents 308d34e9f07d
children
line wrap: on
line source

-*- indented-text -*-

See the end of this file for copyright information.

This file contains two sections:

1) An EBNF (Extended Backus-Naur Form) description of the format of
    the tags file created by etags.c and interpreted by etags.el;
2) A discussion of tag names and implicit tag names.

====================== 1) EBNF tag file description =====================

Productions created from current behaviour to aid extensions
Francesco Potorti` <pot@gnu.org> 2002
----------------

FF ::= #x0c				   /* tag section starter */

LF ::= #x0a				   /* line terminator */

DEL ::= #x7f				   /* pattern terminator */

SOH ::= #x01				   /* name terminator */

regchar ::= [^#x0a#x0c#x7f]		   /* regular character */

regstring ::= { regchar }		   /* regular string */

unsint ::= [0-9] { [0-9] }		   /* non-negative integer */



tagfile ::= { tagsection }		   /* a tags file */

tagsection ::= FF LF ( includesec | regularsec ) LF

includesec ::= filename ",include" [ LF fileprop ]

regularsec ::= filename "," [ unsint ] [ LF fileprop ] { LF tag }

filename ::= regchar regstring		   /* a file name */

fileprop ::= "(" regstring ")"		   /* an elisp alist */

tag ::= directtag | patterntag

directtag ::= DEL realposition		   /* no pattern */

patterntag ::= pattern DEL [ tagname SOH ] position

pattern ::= regstring			   /* a tag pattern */

tagname ::= regchar regstring		   /* a tag name */

position ::= realposition | "," 	   /* charpos,linepos */

realposition ::= "," unsint | unsint "," | unsint "," unsint

==================== end of EBNF tag file description ====================



======================= 2) discussion of tag names =======================

- WHAT ARE TAG NAMES
Tag lines in a tags file are usually made from the above defined pattern
and by an optional tag name.  The pattern is a string that is searched
in the source file to find the tagged line.

- WHY TAG NAMES ARE GOOD
When a user looks for a tag, Emacs first compares the tag with the tag
names contained in the tags file.  If no match is found, Emacs compares
the tag with the patterns.  The tag name is then the preferred way to
look for tags in the tags file, because when the tag name is present
Emacs can find a tag faster and more accurately.  These tag names are
part of tag lines in the tags file, so we call them "explicit".

- WHY IMPLICIT TAG NAMES ARE EVEN BETTER
When a tag line has no name, but a name can be deduced from the pattern,
we say that the tag line has an implicit tag name.  Often tag names are
redundant; this happens when the name of a tag is an easily guessable
substring of the tag pattern.  We define a set of rules to decide
whether it is possible to deduce the tag name from the pattern, and make
an unnamed tag in those cases.  The name deduced from the pattern of an
unnamed tag is the implicit name of that tag.
  When the user looks for a tag, and Emacs finds no explicit tag names
that match it, Emacs then looks for an tag whose implicit tag name
matches the request.  etags.c uses implicit tag names when possible, in
order to reduce the size of the tags file.
  An implicit tag name is deduced from the pattern by discarding the
last character if it is one of ` \f\t\n\r()=,;', then taking all the
rightmost consecutive characters in the pattern which are not one of
those.

===================== end of discussion of tag names =====================

Copyright (C) 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007
Free Software Foundation, Inc.

COPYING PERMISSIONS:

    This file is part of XEmacs.

    XEmacs is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it
    under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
    Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your
    option) any later version.

    XEmacs is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
    ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
    FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License
    for more details.

    You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
    along with XEmacs.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.