view etc/toolbar/cut-cap-up.xpm @ 4942:46f0df723e09

(for main branch) Indent all `with-*' expressions correctly -------------------- ChangeLog entries follow: -------------------- lisp/ChangeLog addition: 2010-01-22 Ben Wing <ben@xemacs.org> * lisp-mode.el: * lisp-mode.el (lisp-indent-function): If the function begins with `with-', assume it is a macro or special form whose last argument is a body. Call `lisp-indent-specform' with a flag indicating that it should indent all arguments as a body instead of with normal (full) indent. * lisp-mode.el (lisp-indent-specform): Add an optional flag argument indicating that all non-distinguished arguments, not just the first, should be indented as a body. This is useful when the number of distinguished (i.e. pre-body) arguments isn't known, and is used for this purpose by `lisp-indent-function'.
author Ben Wing <ben@xemacs.org>
date Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:18:20 -0600
parents 3ecd8885ac67
children 7910031dd78a
line wrap: on
line source

/* XPM */
static char * cut[] = {
"33 33 4 1",
"X	c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor",
"o	c black s foregroundToolBarColor",
"O	c Gray90",
"+	c white",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXooXXXooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXooXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXXXX",
"XXXXXoXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXooOOooXXXXX",
"XXXXXooXXXXXoooXXXXXooOOooXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXooXXXoooooXXXoooooXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooooXXXooooooXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXo+oXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooooXXXooooooXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXooXXXoooooXXXoooooXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXooXXXXXoooXXXXXooOOooXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXoXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXooOOooXXXXX",
"XXXXXooXXXXXooXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXooXXXooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXoXXXoXoXoXoooXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXoXXXoXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXoooXXXooXXoXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};