Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
view lisp/bytecomp-runtime.el @ 583:391cf801cb8d
[xemacs-hg @ 2001-05-27 10:50:44 by nick]
Suppress overwrite confirmation in xemacs.mak
author | nick |
---|---|
date | Sun, 27 May 2001 10:50:44 +0000 |
parents | 7039e6323819 |
children | 943eaba38521 |
line wrap: on
line source
;;; bytecomp-runtime.el --- byte-compiler support for inlining ;; Copyright (C) 1992, 1997 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ;; Author: Jamie Zawinski <jwz@jwz.org> ;; Author: Hallvard Furuseth <hbf@ulrik.uio.no> ;; Maintainer: XEmacs Development Team ;; Keywords: internal, dumped ;; This file is part of XEmacs. ;; XEmacs is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it ;; under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by ;; the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) ;; any later version. ;; XEmacs is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but ;; WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of ;; MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU ;; General Public License for more details. ;; You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License ;; along with XEmacs; see the file COPYING. If not, write to the ;; Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, ;; Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. ;;; Synched up with: FSF 19.30. ;;; Commentary: ;; This file is dumped with XEmacs. ;; The code in this file should always be loaded, because it defines things ;; like "defsubst" which should work interpreted as well. The code in ;; bytecomp.el and byte-optimize.el can be loaded as needed. ;; interface to selectively inlining functions. ;; This only happens when source-code optimization is turned on. ;;; Code: ;; Redefined in byte-optimize.el. ;; This is not documented--it's not clear that we should promote it. (fset 'inline 'progn) (put 'inline 'lisp-indent-hook 0) ;;; Interface to inline functions. ;; FSF comments the next two out, but I see no reason to do so. --ben (defmacro proclaim-inline (&rest fns) "Cause the named functions to be open-coded when called from compiled code. They will only be compiled open-coded when `byte-optimize' is true." (cons 'eval-and-compile (apply 'nconc (mapcar #'(lambda (x) `((or (memq (get ',x 'byte-optimizer) '(nil byte-compile-inline-expand)) (error "%s already has a byte-optimizer, can't make it inline" ',x)) (put ',x 'byte-optimizer 'byte-compile-inline-expand))) fns)))) (defmacro proclaim-notinline (&rest fns) "Cause the named functions to no longer be open-coded." (cons 'eval-and-compile (apply 'nconc (mapcar #'(lambda (x) `((if (eq (get ',x 'byte-optimizer) 'byte-compile-inline-expand) (put ',x 'byte-optimizer nil)))) fns)))) ;; This has a special byte-hunk-handler in bytecomp.el. (defmacro defsubst (name arglist &rest body) "Define an inline function. The syntax is just like that of `defun'." (or (memq (get name 'byte-optimizer) '(nil byte-compile-inline-expand)) (error "`%s' is a primitive" name)) (list 'prog1 (cons 'defun (cons name (cons arglist body))) (list 'proclaim-inline name))) ; Instead of the above line, FSF has this: ; (list 'eval-and-compile ; (list 'put (list 'quote name) ; ''byte-optimizer ''byte-compile-inline-expand)))) (defun make-obsolete (fn new) "Make the byte-compiler warn that FUNCTION is obsolete. The warning will say that NEW should be used instead. If NEW is a string, that is the `use instead' message." (interactive "aMake function obsolete: \nxObsoletion replacement: ") (let ((handler (get fn 'byte-compile))) (if (eq 'byte-compile-obsolete handler) (setcar (get fn 'byte-obsolete-info) new) (put fn 'byte-obsolete-info (cons new handler)) (put fn 'byte-compile 'byte-compile-obsolete))) fn) (defun make-obsolete-variable (var new) "Make the byte-compiler warn that VARIABLE is obsolete, and NEW should be used instead. If NEW is a string, then that is the `use instead' message." (interactive (list (let ((str (completing-read "Make variable obsolete: " obarray 'boundp t))) (if (equal str "") (error "")) (intern str)) (car (read-from-string (read-string "Obsoletion replacement: "))))) (put var 'byte-obsolete-variable new) var) ;; By overwhelming demand, we separate out truly obsolete symbols from ;; those that are present for GNU Emacs compatibility. (defun make-compatible (fn new) "Make the byte-compiler know that FUNCTION is provided for compatibility. The warning will say that NEW should be used instead. If NEW is a string, that is the `use instead' message." (interactive "aMake function compatible: \nxCompatible replacement: ") (let ((handler (get fn 'byte-compile))) (if (eq 'byte-compile-compatible handler) (setcar (get fn 'byte-compatible-info) new) (put fn 'byte-compatible-info (cons new handler)) (put fn 'byte-compile 'byte-compile-compatible))) fn) (defun make-compatible-variable (var new) "Make the byte-compiler know that VARIABLE is provided for compatibility. and NEW should be used instead. If NEW is a string, then that is the `use instead' message." (interactive (list (let ((str (completing-read "Make variable compatible: " obarray 'boundp t))) (if (equal str "") (error "")) (intern str)) (car (read-from-string (read-string "Compatible replacement: "))))) (put var 'byte-compatible-variable new) var) (put 'dont-compile 'lisp-indent-hook 0) (defmacro dont-compile (&rest body) "Like `progn', but the body always runs interpreted (not compiled). If you think you need this, you're probably making a mistake somewhere." (list 'eval (list 'quote (if (cdr body) (cons 'progn body) (car body))))) ;;; interface to evaluating things at compile time and/or load time ;;; these macro must come after any uses of them in this file, as their ;;; definition in the file overrides the magic definitions on the ;;; byte-compile-macro-environment. (put 'eval-when-compile 'lisp-indent-hook 0) (defmacro eval-when-compile (&rest body) "Like `progn', but evaluates the body at compile time. The result of the body appears to the compiler as a quoted constant." ;; Not necessary because we have it in b-c-initial-macro-environment ;; (list 'quote (eval (cons 'progn body))) (cons 'progn body)) (put 'eval-and-compile 'lisp-indent-hook 0) (defmacro eval-and-compile (&rest body) "Like `progn', but evaluates the body at compile time and at load time." ;; Remember, it's magic. (cons 'progn body)) ;;; From Emacs 20. (put 'eval-when-feature 'lisp-indent-hook 1) (defmacro eval-when-feature (feature &rest body) "Run the body forms when FEATURE is featurep, be it now or later. Called (eval-when-feature (FEATURE [. FILENAME]) BODYFORMS...). If (featurep 'FEATURE), evals now; otherwise adds an elt to `after-load-alist' (which see), using FEATURE as filename if FILENAME is nil." (let ((file (or (cdr feature) (symbol-name (car feature))))) `(let ((bodythunk #'(lambda () ,@body))) (if (featurep ',(car feature)) (funcall bodythunk) (setq after-load-alist (cons '(,file . (list 'lambda '() bodythunk)) after-load-alist)))))) ;;; Functions to cleanly eliminate warnings about undefined functions ;;; or variables when the code knows what it's doing. These macros DO ;;; NOT rely on any byte-compiler changes, and thus can be copied into ;;; a package and used within it. ;; NOTE: As a result of the above requirement, the macros rely on ;; "tricks" to get the warnings suppressed. A cleaner way, of course, ;; would be to extend the byte compiler to provide a proper interface. ;; #### Should we require an unquoted symbol rather than a quoted one, ;; as we currently do? The quoting gets no generality, as `eval' is ;; called at compile time. But most functions and macros want quoted ;; arguments, and I find it extremely confusing to deal with cases ;; such as `throw' requiring a quoted argument but `block' an unquoted ;; one. (put 'with-boundp 'lisp-indent-function 1) (defmacro with-boundp (symbols &rest body) "Evaluate BODY, but do not issue bytecomp warnings about SYMBOLS undefined. SYMBOLS can be a symbol or a list of symbols and must be quoted. When compiling this file, the warning `reference to free variable SYMBOL' will not occur. This is a clean way to avoid such warnings. See also `declare-boundp' and `if-boundp'." (setq symbols (eval symbols)) (unless (consp symbols) (setq symbols (list symbols))) `(progn (declare (special ,@symbols)) ,@body)) (put 'if-boundp 'lisp-indent-function 2) (defmacro if-boundp (symbol then &rest else) "Equivalent to (if (boundp SYMBOL) THEN ELSE) but handles bytecomp warnings. When compiling this file, the warning `reference to free variable SYMBOL' will not occur. This is a clean way to avoid such warnings. See also `with-boundp' and `declare-boundp'." `(with-boundp ,symbol (if (boundp ,symbol) ,then ,@else))) (defmacro declare-boundp (symbol) "Evaluate SYMBOL without bytecomp warnings about the symbol. Sample usage is (declare-boundp gpm-minor-mode) which is equivalent to (with-fboundp 'gpm-minor-mode gpm-minor-mode)" `(with-boundp ',symbol ,symbol)) (defmacro globally-declare-boundp (symbol) "Declare that all free uses of SYMBOL in this file are valid. SYMBOL can also be a list of symbols. SYMBOL must be quoted. When compiling this file, the warning `reference to free variable SYMBOL' will not occur regardless of where calls to SYMBOL occur in the file. In general, you should *NOT* use this; use `declare-boundp', `if-boundp', or `with-boundp' to wrap individual uses, as necessary. That way, you're more likely to remember to put in the explicit checks for the variable's existence that are usually necessary. However, `globally-declare-boundp' is better in some circumstances, such as when writing an ELisp package that makes integral use of optionally-compiled-in functionality (typically, an interface onto a system library) and checks for the existence of the functionality at some entry point to the package. See `globally-declare-fboundp' for more information." (setq symbol (eval symbol)) (if (not (consp symbol)) (setq symbol (list symbol))) `(progn ;; (defvar FOO) has no side effects. ,@(mapcar #'(lambda (sym) `(defvar ,sym)) symbol))) (defun byte-compile-with-fboundp (form) (byte-compile-form (cons 'progn (cdr (cdr form)))) ;; Unfortunately, byte-compile-unresolved-functions is used not only ;; for unresolved-function warnings, but also in connection with the ;; following warnings: ;; "defsubst %s was used before it was defined" ;; "%s being defined to take %s%s, but was previously called with %s" ;; By hacking byte-compile-unresolved-functions like this, we ;; effectively disable these warnings. But code should not be using ;; `with-fboundp' with a function defined later on in the same ;; file, so this is not a big deal. (let ((symbols (eval (car (cdr form))))) (unless (consp symbols) (setq symbols (list symbols))) (setq symbols (mapcar #'(lambda (sym) (cons sym nil)) symbols)) (setq byte-compile-unresolved-functions (set-difference byte-compile-unresolved-functions symbols :key #'car)) )) ;; EEEEEEEEVIL hack. We need to create our own byte-compilation ;; method so that the proper variables are bound while compilation ;; takes place (which is when the warnings get noticed and batched ;; up). What we really want to do is make `with-fboundp' a macro ;; that simply `progn's its BODY; but GOD DAMN IT, macros can't have ;; their own byte-compilation methods! So we make `with-fboundp' a ;; macro calling `with-fboundp-1', which is cleverly aliased to ;; progn. This way we can put a byte-compilation method on ;; `with-fboundp-1', and when interpreting, progn will duly skip ;; the first, quoted argument, i.e. the symbol name. (We could make ;; `with-fboundp-1' a regular function, but then we'd have to thunk ;; BODY and eval it at runtime. We could probably just do this using ;; (apply 'progn BODY), but the existing method is more obviously ;; guaranteed to work.) ;; ;; In defense, cl-macs.el does a very similar thing with ;; `cl-block-wrapper'. (put 'with-fboundp-1 'byte-compile 'byte-compile-with-fboundp) (defalias 'with-fboundp-1 'progn) (put 'with-fboundp 'lisp-indent-function 1) (defmacro with-fboundp (symbol &rest body) "Evaluate BODY, but do not issue bytecomp warnings about SYMBOL. SYMBOL must be quoted. When compiling this file, the warning `the function SYMBOL is not known to be defined' will not occur. This is a clean way to avoid such warnings. See also `declare-fboundp', `if-fboundp', and `globally-declare-fboundp'." `(with-fboundp-1 ,symbol ,@body)) (put 'if-fboundp 'lisp-indent-function 2) (defmacro if-fboundp (symbol then &rest else) "Equivalent to (if (fboundp SYMBOL) THEN ELSE) but handles bytecomp warnings. When compiling this file, the warning `the function SYMBOL is not known to be defined' will not occur. This is a clean way to avoid such warnings. See also `declare-fboundp', `with-fboundp', and `globally-declare-fboundp'." `(with-fboundp ,symbol (if (fboundp ,symbol) ,then ,@else))) (defmacro declare-fboundp (form) "Execute FORM (a function call) without bytecomp warnings about the call. Sample usage is (declare-fboundp (x-keysym-on-keyboard-sans-modifiers-p 'backspace)) which is equivalent to (with-fboundp 'x-keysym-on-keyboard-sans-modifiers-p (x-keysym-on-keyboard-sans-modifiers-p 'backspace))" `(with-fboundp ',(car form) ,form)) (defmacro globally-declare-fboundp (symbol) "Declare that all calls to function SYMBOL in this file are valid. SYMBOL can also be a list of symbols. SYMBOL must be quoted. When compiling this file, the warning `the function SYMBOL is not known to be defined' will not occur regardless of where calls to SYMBOL occur in the file. In general, you should *NOT* use this; use `declare-fboundp', `if-fboundp', or `with-fboundp' to wrap individual uses, as necessary. That way, you're more likely to remember to put in the explicit checks for the function's existence that are usually necessary. However, `globally-declare-fboundp' is better in some circumstances, such as when writing an ELisp package that makes integral use of optionally-compiled-in functionality (typically, an interface onto a system library) and checks for the existence of the functionality at some entry point to the package. The file `ldap.el' is a good example: It provides a layer on top of the optional LDAP ELisp primitives, makes calls to them throughout its code, and verifies the presence of LDAP support at load time. Putting calls to `declare-fboundp' throughout the code would be a major annoyance." (when (cl-compiling-file) (setq symbol (eval symbol)) (if (not (consp symbol)) (setq symbol (list symbol))) ;; Another hack. This works because the autoload environment is ;; currently used ONLY to suppress warnings, and the actual ;; autoload definition is not used. (NOTE: With this definition, ;; we will get spurious "multiple autoloads for %s" warnings if we ;; have an autoload later in the file for any functions in SYMBOL. ;; This is not something that code should ever do, though.) (setq byte-compile-autoload-environment (append (mapcar #'(lambda (sym) (cons sym nil)) symbol) byte-compile-autoload-environment))) nil) (defun byte-compile-with-byte-compiler-warnings-suppressed (form) (let ((byte-compile-warnings byte-compile-warnings) (types (car (cdr form)))) (unless (consp types) (setq types (list types))) (if (eq byte-compile-warnings t) (setq byte-compile-warnings byte-compile-default-warnings)) (setq byte-compile-warnings (set-difference byte-compile-warnings types)) (byte-compile-form (cons 'progn (cdr (cdr form)))))) ;; Same hack here as with `with-fboundp'. (put 'with-byte-compiler-warnings-suppressed-1 'byte-compile 'byte-compile-with-byte-compiler-warnings-suppressed) (defalias 'with-byte-compiler-warnings-suppressed-1 'progn) (put 'with-byte-compiler-warnings-suppressed 'lisp-indent-function 1) (defmacro with-byte-compiler-warnings-suppressed (type &rest body) "Evaluate BODY, but do not issue bytecomp warnings TYPE. TYPE should be one of `redefine', `callargs', `subr-callargs', `free-vars', `unresolved', `unused-vars', `obsolete', or `pedantic', or a list of one or more of these symbols. (See `byte-compile-warnings'.) TYPE must be quoted. NOTE: You should *NOT* under normal circumstances be using this! There are better ways of avoiding most of these warnings. In particular: -- use (declare (special ...)) if you are making use of dynamically-scoped variables. -- use `with-fboundp', `declare-fboundp', `if-fboundp', or `globally-declare-fboundp' to avoid warnings about undefined functions when you know the function actually exists. -- use `with-boundp', `declare-boundp', or `if-boundp' to avoid warnings about undefined variables when you know the variable actually exists. -- use `with-obsolete-variable' or `with-obsolete-function' if you are purposely using such a variable or function." `(with-byte-compiler-warnings-suppressed-1 ,type ,@body)) ;; #### These should be more clever. You could (e.g.) try fletting ;; `byte-compile-obsolete' or temporarily removing the obsolete info ;; from the symbol and putting it back with an unwind-protect. (Or ;; better, modify the byte-compiler to provide a proper solution, and ;; fix these macros to use it if available, or fall back on the way ;; below. Remember, these definitions need to work with an unchanged ;; byte compiler so that they can be copied and used in packages.) (put 'with-obsolete-variable 'lisp-indent-function 1) (defmacro with-obsolete-variable (symbol &rest body) "Evaluate BODY but do not warn about usage of obsolete variable SYMBOL. SYMBOL must be quoted. See also `with-obsolete-function'." `(with-byte-compiler-warnings-suppressed 'obsolete ,@body)) (put 'with-obsolete-function 'lisp-indent-function 1) (defmacro with-obsolete-function (symbol &rest body) "Evaluate BODY but do not warn about usage of obsolete function SYMBOL. SYMBOL must be quoted. See also `with-obsolete-variable'." `(with-byte-compiler-warnings-suppressed 'obsolete ,@body)) ;;; Interface to file-local byte-compiler parameters. ;;; Redefined in bytecomp.el. ;;; The great RMS speaketh: ;;; ;;; I nuked this because it's not a good idea for users to think of ;;; using it. These options are a matter of installation preference, ;;; and have nothing to do with particular source files; it's a ;;; mistake to suggest to users that they should associate these with ;;; particular source files. There is hardly any reason to change ;;; these parameters, anyway. --rms. ;;; ;;; But I'll leave this stuff alone. --ben (put 'byte-compiler-options 'lisp-indent-hook 0) (defmacro byte-compiler-options (&rest args) "Set some compilation-parameters for this file. This will affect only the file in which it appears; this does nothing when evaluated, or when loaded from a .el file. Each argument to this macro must be a list of a key and a value. Keys: Values: Corresponding variable: verbose t, nil byte-compile-verbose optimize t, nil, source, byte byte-optimize warnings list of warnings byte-compile-warnings file-format emacs19, emacs20 byte-compile-emacs19-compatibility The value specified with the `warnings' option must be a list, containing some subset of the following flags: free-vars references to variables not in the current lexical scope. unused-vars references to non-global variables bound but not referenced. unresolved calls to unknown functions. callargs lambda calls with args that don't match the definition. subr-callargs calls to subrs with args that don't match the definition. redefine function cell redefined from a macro to a lambda or vice versa, or redefined to take a different number of arguments. obsolete use of an obsolete function or variable. pedantic warn of use of compatible symbols. If the first element if the list is `+' or `-' then the specified elements are added to or removed from the current set of warnings, instead of the entire set of warnings being overwritten. For example, something like this might appear at the top of a source file: (byte-compiler-options (optimize t) (warnings (- callargs)) ; Don't warn about arglist mismatch (warnings (+ unused-vars)) ; Do warn about unused bindings (file-format emacs19))" nil) ;;; bytecomp-runtime.el ends here