Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
view etc/toolbar/info-def-cap-up.xpm @ 4889:1fbf8bffa545
Add Unicode-case-table-based torture test to case-tests.el
-------------------- ChangeLog entries follow: --------------------
tests/ChangeLog addition:
2010-01-27 Ben Wing <ben@xemacs.org>
* automated/case-tests.el:
* automated/case-tests.el (char-as-unicode-escape): New.
Add a "torture test" that uses the full set of lower-upper case
mappings from Unicode. See whether strings composed of all
lower-case characters across all languages will correctly be
uppercased to the string equivalent to all uppercase characters,
and vice-versa, and whether you can correctly do a case-folding
search in a buffer for these characters, all at once or individually.
Result: a number of assertion failures.
author | Ben Wing <ben@xemacs.org> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:27:02 -0600 |
parents | 3ecd8885ac67 |
children | 7910031dd78a |
line wrap: on
line source
/* XPM */ static char * info[] = { "33 33 2 1", "X c Gray75 s backgroundToolBarColor", "o c black s foregroundToolBarColor", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooooXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXooooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXoooooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXoooooooXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXoooooooooXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXoXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoooXXoooXooXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoXXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoXXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoXXoXXoXoXXoXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXoXoXXoXXoXXooXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"};