--- a/man/lispref/customize.texi	Fri Dec 19 11:24:59 2003 +0000
+++ b/man/lispref/customize.texi	Fri Dec 19 14:29:07 2003 +0000
@@ -325,6 +325,7 @@
 * Composite Types::
 * Splicing into Lists::
 * Type Keywords::
+* Defining New Types::
 @end menu
 
 @node Simple Types
@@ -852,3 +853,63 @@
 @var{force} from the prefix argument.
 @end defun
 
+@node Defining New Types
+@subsection Defining New Types
+
+In the previous sections we have described how to construct elaborate
+type specifications for @code{defcustom}.  In some cases you may want to
+give such a type specification a name.  The obvious case is when you are
+using the same type for many user options, rather than repeat the
+specification for each option, you can give the type specification a
+name once, and use that name each @code{defcustom}.  The other case is
+when a user option accept a recursive datastructure.  To make it
+possible for a datatype to refer to itself, it needs to have a name.
+
+Since custom types are implemented as widgets, the way to define a new
+customize type is to define a new widget.  We are not going to describe
+the widget interface here in details, see @ref{Top, , Introduction,
+widget, The Emacs Widget Library}, for that.  Instead we are going to
+demonstrate the minimal functionality needed for defining new customize
+types by a simple example.
+
+@example
+(define-widget 'binary-tree-of-string 'lazy
+  "A binary tree made of cons-cells and strings."
+  :offset 4
+  :tag "Node"
+  :type '(choice (string :tag "Leaf" :value "")
+                 (cons :tag "Interior"
+                       :value ("" . "") 
+                       binary-tree-of-string
+                       binary-tree-of-string)))
+
+(defcustom foo-bar ""
+  "Sample variable holding a binary tree of strings."
+  :type 'binary-tree-of-string)
+@end example
+
+The function to define a new widget is name @code{define-widget}.  The
+first argument is the symbol we want to make a new widget type.  The
+second argument is a symbol representing an existing widget, the new
+widget is going to be defined in terms of difference from the existing
+widget.  For the purpose of defining new customization types, the
+@code{lazy} widget is perfect, because it accept a @code{:type} keyword
+argument with the same syntax as the keyword argument to
+@code{defcustom} with the same name.  The third argument is a
+documentation string for the new widget.  You will be able to see that
+string with the @kbd{M-x widget-browse @key{ret} binary-tree-of-string
+@key{ret}} command.  
+
+After these mandatory arguments follows the keyword arguments.  The most
+important is @code{:type}, which describes the datatype we want to match
+with this widget.  Here a @code{binary-tree-of-string} is described as
+being either a string, or a cons-cell whose car and cdr are themselves
+both @code{binary-tree-of-string}.  Note the reference to the widget
+type we are currently in the process of defining.  The @code{:tag}
+attribute is a string to name the widget in the user interface, and the
+@code{:offset} argument are there to ensure that child nodes are
+indented four spaces relatively to the parent node, making the tree
+structure apparent in the customization buffer.
+
+The @code{defcustom} shows how the new widget can be used as an ordinary
+customization type.