diff src/number.h @ 5307:c096d8051f89

Have NATNUMP give t for positive bignums; check limits appropriately. src/ChangeLog addition: 2010-11-20 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * abbrev.c (Fexpand_abbrev): * alloc.c: * alloc.c (Fmake_list): * alloc.c (Fmake_vector): * alloc.c (Fmake_bit_vector): * alloc.c (Fmake_byte_code): * alloc.c (Fmake_string): * alloc.c (vars_of_alloc): * bytecode.c (UNUSED): * bytecode.c (Fbyte_code): * chartab.c (decode_char_table_range): * cmds.c (Fself_insert_command): * data.c (check_integer_range): * data.c (Fnatnump): * data.c (Fnonnegativep): * data.c (Fstring_to_number): * elhash.c (hash_table_size_validate): * elhash.c (decode_hash_table_size): * eval.c (Fbacktrace_frame): * event-stream.c (lisp_number_to_milliseconds): * event-stream.c (Faccept_process_output): * event-stream.c (Frecent_keys): * event-stream.c (Fdispatch_event): * events.c (Fmake_event): * events.c (Fevent_timestamp): * events.c (Fevent_timestamp_lessp): * events.h: * events.h (struct command_builder): * file-coding.c (gzip_putprop): * fns.c: * fns.c (check_sequence_range): * fns.c (Frandom): * fns.c (Fnthcdr): * fns.c (Flast): * fns.c (Fnbutlast): * fns.c (Fbutlast): * fns.c (Fmember): * fns.c (Ffill): * fns.c (Freduce): * fns.c (replace_string_range_1): * fns.c (Freplace): * font-mgr.c (Ffc_pattern_get): * frame-msw.c (msprinter_set_frame_properties): * glyphs.c (check_valid_xbm_inline): * indent.c (Fmove_to_column): * intl-win32.c (mswindows_multibyte_to_unicode_putprop): * lisp.h: * lisp.h (ARRAY_DIMENSION_LIMIT): * lread.c (decode_mode_1): * mule-ccl.c (ccl_get_compiled_code): * number.h: * process-unix.c (unix_open_multicast_group): * process.c (Fset_process_window_size): * profile.c (Fstart_profiling): * unicode.c (Funicode_to_char): Change NATNUMP to return 1 for positive bignums; changes uses of it and of CHECK_NATNUM appropriately, usually by checking for an integer in an appropriate range. Add array-dimension-limit and use it in #'make-vector, #'make-string. Add array-total-size-limit, array-rank-limit while we're at it, for the sake of any Common Lisp-oriented code that uses these limits. Rename check_int_range to check_integer_range, have it take Lisp_Objects (and thus bignums) instead. Remove bignum_butlast(), just set int_n to an appropriately large integer if N is a bignum. Accept bignums in check_sequence_range(), change the functions that use check_sequence_range() appropriately. Move the definition of NATNUMP() to number.h; document why it's a reasonable name, contradicting an old comment. tests/ChangeLog addition: 2010-11-20 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> * automated/lisp-tests.el: * automated/lisp-tests.el (featurep): * automated/lisp-tests.el (wrong-type-argument): * automated/mule-tests.el (featurep): Check for args-out-of-range errors instead of wrong-type-argument errors in various places when code is handed a large bignum instead of a fixnum. Also check for the wrong-type-argument errors when giving the same code a non-integer value.
author Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
date Sat, 20 Nov 2010 16:49:11 +0000
parents 7e535575bf6d
children 8d29f1c4bb98
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/number.h	Wed Nov 17 14:37:26 2010 +0000
+++ b/src/number.h	Sat Nov 20 16:49:11 2010 +0000
@@ -153,6 +153,40 @@
 EXFUN (Fevenp, 1);
 EXFUN (Foddp, 1);
 
+/* There are varying mathematical definitions of what a natural number is,
+   differing about whether 0 is inside or outside the set. The Oxford
+   English Dictionary, second edition, does say that they are whole numbers,
+   not fractional, but it doesn't give a bound, and gives a quotation
+   talking about the natural numbers from 1 to 100. Since 100 is certainly
+   *not* the upper bound on natural numbers, we can't take 1 as the lower
+   bound from that example. The Real Academia Española's dictionary, not of
+   English but certainly sharing the western academic tradition, says of
+   "número natural":
+
+   1.  m. Mat. Cada uno de los elementos de la sucesión 0, 1, 2, 3...
+
+   that is, "each of the elements of the succession 0, 1, 2, 3 ...". The
+   various Wikipedia articles in languages I can read agree.  It's
+   reasonable to call this macro and the associated Lisp function
+   NATNUMP. */
+
+#ifdef HAVE_BIGNUM
+#define NATNUMP(x) ((INTP (x) && XINT (x) >= 0) || \
+                    (BIGNUMP (x) && bignum_sign (XBIGNUM_DATA (x)) >= 0))
+#else
+#define NATNUMP(x) (INTP (x) && XINT (x) >= 0)
+#endif
+
+#define CHECK_NATNUM(x) do {			\
+  if (!NATNUMP (x))				\
+    dead_wrong_type_argument (Qnatnump, x);	\
+} while (0)
+
+#define CONCHECK_NATNUM(x) do {			\
+  if (!NATNUMP (x))				\
+    x = wrong_type_argument (Qnatnump, x);	\
+} while (0)
+
 
 /********************************** Ratios **********************************/
 #ifdef HAVE_RATIO