diff configure @ 5877:abe88cd200c9

Configure support for 64-bit cygwin
author Vin Shelton <acs@xemacs.org>
date Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:39:53 -0400
parents 3ed83b4b4882
children 6eca500211f4
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/configure	Tue Mar 24 16:49:53 2015 -0400
+++ b/configure	Thu Mar 26 14:39:53 2015 -0400
@@ -5834,6 +5834,7 @@
   hppa-*-*         ) machine=hp800 ;;
   arm*             ) machine=arm ;;
   i[3-9]86-*-*   ) machine=intel386 ;;
+  x86_64-*-*       ) machine=x86_64 ;;
 esac
 
 case "$ac_cv_build" in
@@ -5909,6 +5910,12 @@
         test "$opsys $CC" = "sol2 /usr/ucb/cc" && CC=""
   ;;
 
+    x86_64-*-* )
+    case "$ac_cv_build" in
+      *-cygwin* )	opsys=cygwin64 ;;
+          esac
+  ;;
+
     i[3-9]86-*-* )
     case "$ac_cv_build" in
       *-mach* )			opsys=mach-bsd4-3 ;;
@@ -11790,7 +11797,7 @@
     We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
     since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
     incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807.  */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
   int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
 		       && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
 		      ? 1 : -1];
@@ -11836,7 +11843,7 @@
     We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
     since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
     incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807.  */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
   int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
 		       && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
 		      ? 1 : -1];
@@ -11860,7 +11867,7 @@
     We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
     since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
     incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807.  */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
   int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
 		       && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
 		      ? 1 : -1];
@@ -11905,7 +11912,7 @@
     We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
     since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
     incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807.  */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
   int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
 		       && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
 		      ? 1 : -1];
@@ -11929,7 +11936,7 @@
     We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
     since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
     incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807.  */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
   int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
 		       && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
 		      ? 1 : -1];