Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
diff man/xemacs-faq.texi @ 3404:a83f79c23956
[xemacs-hg @ 2006-05-16 15:36:10 by stephent]
Document X11R7 omits bitmaps. <87mzdivv9i.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
author | stephent |
---|---|
date | Tue, 16 May 2006 15:36:16 +0000 |
parents | 15139dbf89f4 |
children | ee41a739fba3 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/man/xemacs-faq.texi Tue May 16 13:48:04 2006 +0000 +++ b/man/xemacs-faq.texi Tue May 16 15:36:16 2006 +0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ @finalout @titlepage @title XEmacs FAQ -@subtitle Frequently asked questions about XEmacs @* Last Modified: $Date: 2005/12/27 18:51:21 $ +@subtitle Frequently asked questions about XEmacs @* Last Modified: $Date: 2006/05/16 15:36:16 $ @sp 1 @author Ben Wing <ben@@xemacs.org> @author Tony Rossini <rossini@@u.washington.edu> @@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ 2.2: Unix/Mac OS X Installation (Also Relevant to Cygwin, MinGW) * Q2.2.1:: Libraries in non-standard locations * Q2.2.2:: Why can't I strip XEmacs? +* Q2.2.3:: X11/bitmaps/gray (or other X11-related file) not found. 2.3: Windows Installation (Windows, Cygwin, MinGW) * Q2.3.1:: What exactly are all the different ways to build XEmacs under Windows? @@ -3089,6 +3090,7 @@ 2.2: Unix/Mac OS X Installation (Also Relevant to Cygwin, MinGW) * Q2.2.1:: Libraries in non-standard locations * Q2.2.2:: Why can't I strip XEmacs? +* Q2.2.3:: X11/bitmaps/gray (or other X11-related file) not found. 2.3: Windows Installation (Windows, Cygwin, MinGW) * Q2.3.1:: What exactly are all the different ways to build XEmacs under Windows? @@ -3584,7 +3586,7 @@ --with-site-prefixes=WHATEVER @end example -@node Q2.2.2, Q2.3.1, Q2.2.1, Installation +@node Q2.2.2, Q2.2.3, Q2.2.1, Installation @unnumberedsubsec Q2.2.2: Why can't I strip XEmacs? @email{cognot@@fronsac.ensg.u-nancy.fr, Richard Cognot} writes: @@ -3639,9 +3641,20 @@ @end enumerate @end quotation +@node Q2.2.3, Q2.3.1, Q2.2.2, Installation +@unnumberedsubsec Q2.2.3: X11/bitmaps/gray (or other X11-related file) not found. + +The X11R6 distribution was monolithic, but the X11R7 distribution is +much more modular. Many OS distributions omit these bitmaps (assuming +nobody uses them, evidently). Your OS distribution should have a +developer's package containing these files, probably with a name +containing the string "bitmap". Known package names (you may need to +add an extension such as .deb or .rpm) include x11/xbitmaps (Ubuntu) +and xorg-x11-xbitmaps (Fedora Core 5). + @unnumberedsec 2.3: Windows Installation (Windows, Cygwin, MinGW) -@node Q2.3.1, Q2.3.2, Q2.2.2, Installation +@node Q2.3.1, Q2.3.2, Q2.2.3, Installation @unnumberedsubsec Q2.3.1: What exactly are all the different ways to build XEmacs under Windows? XEmacs can be built in several ways in the MS Windows environment.