Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
diff configure.ac @ 3248:8d7c2461057a
[xemacs-hg @ 2006-02-20 15:58:23 by stephent]
configure.ac comments. <877j7qqb0z.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
| author | stephent |
|---|---|
| date | Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:58:24 +0000 |
| parents | 80361b938eaa |
| children | d674024a8674 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/configure.ac Mon Feb 20 15:10:13 2006 +0000 +++ b/configure.ac Mon Feb 20 15:58:24 2006 +0000 @@ -4472,8 +4472,6 @@ AC_CHECKING([for Mule input methods]) dnl Do we have the XmIm* routines? And if so, do we want to use them? - dnl XIM seems to be flaky except on Solaris... - dnl test -z "$with_xim" -a "$opsys" != "sol2" && with_xim=no case "$with_xim" in "" | "yes" ) AC_CHECKING([for XIM]) AC_CHECK_LIB(X11, XOpenIM, with_xim=xlib, with_xim=no) @@ -4481,6 +4479,8 @@ dnl Only use Motif if linking Motif anyway, or don't have xlib XIM if test "$need_motif $have_lesstif" = "yes no"; then AC_CHECK_LIB(Xm, XmImMbLookupString, with_xim=motif) + dnl #### This is always false. + dnl Not clear what we want, although "yes no yes" is insufficient. elif test "$have_motif $have_lesstif $with_xim" = "yes no no"; then AC_CHECK_LIB(Xm, XmImMbLookupString, with_xim=motif) fi ;;