Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
comparison src/scrollbar.c @ 3024:b7f26b2f78bd
[xemacs-hg @ 2005-10-25 08:32:40 by ben]
more mc-alloc-related factoring; make it hard to do the wrong thing
postgresql/postgresql.c, postgresql/postgresql.h: MC-Alloc refactoring.
ldap/eldap.c, ldap/eldap.h: MC-Alloc refactoring.
alloc.c, buffer.c, console.c, emacs.c, file-coding.c, lrecord.h, lstream.c, mule-charset.c, print.c, scrollbar-gtk.c, scrollbar-msw.c, scrollbar-x.c, scrollbar.c, symbols.c, symeval.h, unicode.c, window.c, xemacs.def.in.in: rename `struct lcrecord_header' to `struct old_lcrecord_header';
likewise for `old_basic_alloc_lcrecord', `old_free_lcrecord',
`old_zero_lcrecord', `old_zero_sized_lcrecord', `old_copy_lcrecord',
`old_copy_sized_lcrecord', `old_alloc_lcrecord_type'. Created new
LISPOBJ_STORAGE_SIZE() used only on objects created through allocation
of Lisp-Object memory instead of basic xmalloc()/xfree(). This is
distinguished from malloced_storage_size(), for non-Lisp-Objects.
The definition of LISPOBJ_STORAGE_SIZE() can reduce down to
malloced_storage_size() when not MC-ALLOC, but with MC-ALLOC it's
a different function.
The whole point other than cleaning up the use of LISPOBJ_STORAGE_SIZE
is to make it harder to accidentally use the old kind (lowercase) of
function in new code, since you get a compile error.
author | ben |
---|---|
date | Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:32:50 +0000 |
parents | 1e7cc382eb16 |
children | 3742ea8250b5 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
3023:d305f4207861 | 3024:b7f26b2f78bd |
---|---|
270 if (HAS_DEVMETH_P(d, compute_scrollbar_instance_usage)) | 270 if (HAS_DEVMETH_P(d, compute_scrollbar_instance_usage)) |
271 total += DEVMETH (d, compute_scrollbar_instance_usage, (d, inst, ovstats)); | 271 total += DEVMETH (d, compute_scrollbar_instance_usage, (d, inst, ovstats)); |
272 | 272 |
273 while (inst) | 273 while (inst) |
274 { | 274 { |
275 total += MALLOCED_STORAGE_SIZE (inst, sizeof (*inst), ovstats); | 275 total += LISPOBJ_STORAGE_SIZE (inst, sizeof (*inst), ovstats); |
276 inst = inst->next; | 276 inst = inst->next; |
277 } | 277 } |
278 | 278 |
279 return total; | 279 return total; |
280 } | 280 } |