Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
comparison PROBLEMS @ 263:727739f917cb r20-5b30
Import from CVS: tag r20-5b30
author | cvs |
---|---|
date | Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:24:41 +0200 |
parents | 11cf20601dec |
children | ca9a9ec9c1c1 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
262:9d8607af9e13 | 263:727739f917cb |
---|---|
31 ** Don't use -O2 with gcc 2.7.2 under Intel/XXX without also using | 31 ** Don't use -O2 with gcc 2.7.2 under Intel/XXX without also using |
32 `-fno-strength-reduce'. | 32 `-fno-strength-reduce'. |
33 | 33 |
34 gcc will generate incorrect code otherwise. This bug is present in at | 34 gcc will generate incorrect code otherwise. This bug is present in at |
35 least 2.6.x and 2.7.[0-2]. This bug has been fixed in GCC 2.7.2.1 and | 35 least 2.6.x and 2.7.[0-2]. This bug has been fixed in GCC 2.7.2.1 and |
36 later. This bug is also O/S independent. | 36 later. This bug is O/S independent, but is limited to x86 architectures. |
37 | |
38 This problem is known to be fixed in egcs (or pgcc) 1.0 or later. | |
37 | 39 |
38 ** Don't use -O2 with gcc 2.7.2 under Intel architectures without also | 40 ** Don't use -O2 with gcc 2.7.2 under Intel architectures without also |
39 using `-fno-caller-saves'. | 41 using `-fno-caller-saves'. |
40 | 42 |
41 gcc will generate incorrect code otherwise. This bug is still present | 43 gcc will generate incorrect code otherwise. This bug is still |
42 in gcc 2.7.2.3. There have been no reports to indicate the bug is | 44 present in gcc 2.7.2.3. There have been no reports to indicate the |
43 present in egcs 1.0 (or pgcc 1.0) or later. This bug is O/S independent. | 45 bug is present in egcs 1.0 (or pgcc 1.0) or later. This bug is O/S |
46 independent, but limited to x86 architectures. | |
47 | |
48 This problem is known to be fixed in egcs (or pgcc) 1.0 or later. | |
44 | 49 |
45 ** Excessive optimization with pgcc can break XEmacs | 50 ** Excessive optimization with pgcc can break XEmacs |
46 | 51 |
47 It has been reported on some systems that compiling with -O6 can lead | 52 It has been reported on some systems that compiling with -O6 can lead |
48 to XEmacs failures. The workaround is to use a lower optimization | 53 to XEmacs failures. The workaround is to use a lower optimization |