comparison man/lispref/os.texi @ 412:697ef44129c6 r21-2-14

Import from CVS: tag r21-2-14
author cvs
date Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:20:41 +0200
parents 74fd4e045ea6
children
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
411:12e008d41344 412:697ef44129c6
1600 @cindex @kbd{C-q} 1600 @cindex @kbd{C-q}
1601 At one time, most terminals did not need flow control, and none used 1601 At one time, most terminals did not need flow control, and none used
1602 @code{C-s} and @kbd{C-q} for flow control. Therefore, the choice of 1602 @code{C-s} and @kbd{C-q} for flow control. Therefore, the choice of
1603 @kbd{C-s} and @kbd{C-q} as command characters was uncontroversial. 1603 @kbd{C-s} and @kbd{C-q} as command characters was uncontroversial.
1604 XEmacs, for economy of keystrokes and portability, used nearly all the 1604 XEmacs, for economy of keystrokes and portability, used nearly all the
1605 @sc{ascii} control characters, with mnemonic meanings when possible; 1605 @sc{ASCII} control characters, with mnemonic meanings when possible;
1606 thus, @kbd{C-s} for search and @kbd{C-q} for quote. 1606 thus, @kbd{C-s} for search and @kbd{C-q} for quote.
1607 1607
1608 Later, some terminals were introduced which required these characters 1608 Later, some terminals were introduced which required these characters
1609 for flow control. They were not very good terminals for full-screen 1609 for flow control. They were not very good terminals for full-screen
1610 editing, so XEmacs maintainers did not pay attention. In later years, 1610 editing, so XEmacs maintainers did not pay attention. In later years,