Mercurial > hg > xemacs-beta
annotate man/lispref/functions.texi @ 5903:5afddd952c46
Return ratios in canonical form too, #'string-to-number
src/ChangeLog addition:
2015-05-08 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
* data.c (Fstring_to_number):
Canonicalise ratios in this function, as we do bignums.
author | Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 08 May 2015 13:58:22 +0100 |
parents | 9fae6227ede5 |
children |
rev | line source |
---|---|
428 | 1 @c -*-texinfo-*- |
2 @c This is part of the XEmacs Lisp Reference Manual. | |
444 | 3 @c Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 Free Software Foundation, Inc. |
428 | 4 @c See the file lispref.texi for copying conditions. |
5 @setfilename ../../info/functions.info | |
2492 | 6 @node Functions and Commands, Macros, Variables, Top |
7 @chapter Functions and Commands | |
428 | 8 |
9 A Lisp program is composed mainly of Lisp functions. This chapter | |
10 explains what functions are, how they accept arguments, and how to | |
11 define them. | |
12 | |
13 @menu | |
14 * What Is a Function:: Lisp functions vs. primitives; terminology. | |
15 * Lambda Expressions:: How functions are expressed as Lisp objects. | |
16 * Function Names:: A symbol can serve as the name of a function. | |
17 * Defining Functions:: Lisp expressions for defining functions. | |
18 * Calling Functions:: How to use an existing function. | |
19 * Mapping Functions:: Applying a function to each element of a list, etc. | |
444 | 20 * Anonymous Functions:: Lambda expressions are functions with no names. |
428 | 21 * Function Cells:: Accessing or setting the function definition |
22 of a symbol. | |
23 * Inline Functions:: Defining functions that the compiler will open code. | |
24 * Related Topics:: Cross-references to specific Lisp primitives | |
25 that have a special bearing on how functions work. | |
26 @end menu | |
27 | |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
28 @node What Is a Function, Lambda Expressions, Functions and Commands, Functions and Commands |
428 | 29 @section What Is a Function? |
30 | |
31 In a general sense, a function is a rule for carrying on a computation | |
32 given several values called @dfn{arguments}. The result of the | |
33 computation is called the value of the function. The computation can | |
34 also have side effects: lasting changes in the values of variables or | |
35 the contents of data structures. | |
36 | |
37 Here are important terms for functions in XEmacs Lisp and for other | |
38 function-like objects. | |
39 | |
40 @table @dfn | |
41 @item function | |
42 @cindex function | |
43 In XEmacs Lisp, a @dfn{function} is anything that can be applied to | |
44 arguments in a Lisp program. In some cases, we use it more | |
4905
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
45 specifically to mean a function written in Lisp. Special operators and |
428 | 46 macros are not functions. |
47 | |
2492 | 48 @item command |
49 @cindex command | |
50 | |
51 A @dfn{command} is a possible definition for a key sequence---we count | |
52 mouse events and menu accesses as key sequences for this purpose. More | |
53 formally, within XEmacs lisp, a command is something that | |
54 @code{command-execute} can invoke. | |
55 | |
56 Some functions are commands; a function written in Lisp is a command if | |
57 it contains an interactive declaration. A trivial interactive | |
58 declaration is a line @code{(interactive)} immediately after the | |
59 documentation string. For more complex examples, with prompting and | |
60 completion, see @xref{Defining Commands}. Such a function can be called | |
61 from Lisp expressions like other functions; in this case, the fact that | |
62 the function is a command makes no difference. | |
63 | |
64 Keyboard macros (strings and vectors) are commands also, even though | |
65 they are not functions. A symbol is a command if its function | |
66 definition is a command; such symbols can be invoked with @kbd{M-x}. | |
67 The symbol is a function as well if the definition is a function. | |
68 | |
69 In the case where you want to call a command in reaction to a | |
70 user-generated event, you'll need to bind it to that event. For how to | |
71 do this, see @xref{Key Binding Commands}. | |
72 @xref{Command Overview}. | |
73 | |
74 @item keystroke command | |
75 @cindex keystroke command | |
76 A @dfn{keystroke command} is a command that is bound to a key sequence | |
77 (typically one to three keystrokes). The distinction is made here | |
78 merely to avoid confusion with the meaning of ``command'' in non-Emacs | |
79 editors; for Lisp programs, the distinction is normally unimportant. | |
80 | |
428 | 81 @item primitive |
82 @cindex primitive | |
83 @cindex subr | |
84 @cindex built-in function | |
85 A @dfn{primitive} is a function callable from Lisp that is written in C, | |
86 such as @code{car} or @code{append}. These functions are also called | |
4905
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
87 @dfn{built-in} functions or @dfn{subrs}. (Special operators are also |
428 | 88 considered primitives.) |
89 | |
90 Usually the reason that a function is a primitives is because it is | |
91 fundamental, because it provides a low-level interface to operating | |
92 system services, or because it needs to run fast. Primitives can be | |
93 modified or added only by changing the C sources and recompiling the | |
94 editor. See @ref{Writing Lisp Primitives,,, internals, XEmacs | |
95 Internals Manual}. | |
96 | |
97 @item lambda expression | |
98 A @dfn{lambda expression} is a function written in Lisp. | |
99 These are described in the following section. | |
100 @ifinfo | |
101 @xref{Lambda Expressions}. | |
102 @end ifinfo | |
103 | |
4905
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
104 @item special operator |
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
105 A @dfn{special operator} is a primitive that is like a function but does not |
428 | 106 evaluate all of its arguments in the usual way. It may evaluate only |
107 some of the arguments, or may evaluate them in an unusual order, or | |
4905
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
108 several times. Many special operators are described in @ref{Control |
428 | 109 Structures}. |
110 | |
111 @item macro | |
112 @cindex macro | |
113 A @dfn{macro} is a construct defined in Lisp by the programmer. It | |
114 differs from a function in that it translates a Lisp expression that you | |
115 write into an equivalent expression to be evaluated instead of the | |
116 original expression. Macros enable Lisp programmers to do the sorts of | |
4905
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
117 things that special operators can do. @xref{Macros}, for how to define and |
428 | 118 use macros. |
119 | |
120 @item compiled function | |
121 A @dfn{compiled function} is a function that has been compiled by the | |
122 byte compiler. @xref{Compiled-Function Type}. | |
123 @end table | |
124 | |
125 @defun subrp object | |
126 This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a built-in function | |
127 (i.e., a Lisp primitive). | |
128 | |
129 @example | |
130 @group | |
131 (subrp 'message) ; @r{@code{message} is a symbol,} | |
132 @result{} nil ; @r{not a subr object.} | |
133 @end group | |
134 @group | |
135 (subrp (symbol-function 'message)) | |
136 @result{} t | |
137 @end group | |
138 @end example | |
139 @end defun | |
140 | |
141 @defun compiled-function-p object | |
142 This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a compiled | |
143 function. For example: | |
144 | |
145 @example | |
146 @group | |
147 (compiled-function-p (symbol-function 'next-line)) | |
148 @result{} t | |
149 @end group | |
150 @end example | |
151 @end defun | |
152 | |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
153 @node Lambda Expressions, Function Names, What Is a Function, Functions and Commands |
428 | 154 @section Lambda Expressions |
155 @cindex lambda expression | |
156 | |
157 A function written in Lisp is a list that looks like this: | |
158 | |
159 @example | |
160 (lambda (@var{arg-variables}@dots{}) | |
161 @r{[}@var{documentation-string}@r{]} | |
162 @r{[}@var{interactive-declaration}@r{]} | |
163 @var{body-forms}@dots{}) | |
164 @end example | |
165 | |
166 @noindent | |
167 Such a list is called a @dfn{lambda expression}. In XEmacs Lisp, it | |
168 actually is valid as an expression---it evaluates to itself. In some | |
169 other Lisp dialects, a lambda expression is not a valid expression at | |
170 all. In either case, its main use is not to be evaluated as an | |
171 expression, but to be called as a function. | |
172 | |
173 @menu | |
174 * Lambda Components:: The parts of a lambda expression. | |
175 * Simple Lambda:: A simple example. | |
176 * Argument List:: Details and special features of argument lists. | |
177 * Function Documentation:: How to put documentation in a function. | |
178 @end menu | |
179 | |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
180 @node Lambda Components, Simple Lambda, Lambda Expressions, Lambda Expressions |
428 | 181 @subsection Components of a Lambda Expression |
182 | |
183 @ifinfo | |
184 | |
185 A function written in Lisp (a ``lambda expression'') is a list that | |
186 looks like this: | |
187 | |
188 @example | |
189 (lambda (@var{arg-variables}@dots{}) | |
190 [@var{documentation-string}] | |
191 [@var{interactive-declaration}] | |
192 @var{body-forms}@dots{}) | |
193 @end example | |
194 @end ifinfo | |
195 | |
196 @cindex lambda list | |
197 The first element of a lambda expression is always the symbol | |
198 @code{lambda}. This indicates that the list represents a function. The | |
199 reason functions are defined to start with @code{lambda} is so that | |
200 other lists, intended for other uses, will not accidentally be valid as | |
201 functions. | |
202 | |
203 The second element is a list of symbols--the argument variable names. | |
204 This is called the @dfn{lambda list}. When a Lisp function is called, | |
205 the argument values are matched up against the variables in the lambda | |
206 list, which are given local bindings with the values provided. | |
207 @xref{Local Variables}. | |
208 | |
209 The documentation string is a Lisp string object placed within the | |
210 function definition to describe the function for the XEmacs help | |
211 facilities. @xref{Function Documentation}. | |
212 | |
213 The interactive declaration is a list of the form @code{(interactive | |
214 @var{code-string})}. This declares how to provide arguments if the | |
215 function is used interactively. Functions with this declaration are called | |
216 @dfn{commands}; they can be called using @kbd{M-x} or bound to a key. | |
217 Functions not intended to be called in this way should not have interactive | |
218 declarations. @xref{Defining Commands}, for how to write an interactive | |
219 declaration. | |
220 | |
221 @cindex body of function | |
222 The rest of the elements are the @dfn{body} of the function: the Lisp | |
223 code to do the work of the function (or, as a Lisp programmer would say, | |
224 ``a list of Lisp forms to evaluate''). The value returned by the | |
225 function is the value returned by the last element of the body. | |
226 | |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
227 @node Simple Lambda, Argument List, Lambda Components, Lambda Expressions |
428 | 228 @subsection A Simple Lambda-Expression Example |
229 | |
230 Consider for example the following function: | |
231 | |
232 @example | |
233 (lambda (a b c) (+ a b c)) | |
234 @end example | |
235 | |
236 @noindent | |
237 We can call this function by writing it as the @sc{car} of an | |
238 expression, like this: | |
239 | |
240 @example | |
241 @group | |
242 ((lambda (a b c) (+ a b c)) | |
243 1 2 3) | |
244 @end group | |
245 @end example | |
246 | |
247 @noindent | |
248 This call evaluates the body of the lambda expression with the variable | |
249 @code{a} bound to 1, @code{b} bound to 2, and @code{c} bound to 3. | |
250 Evaluation of the body adds these three numbers, producing the result 6; | |
251 therefore, this call to the function returns the value 6. | |
252 | |
253 Note that the arguments can be the results of other function calls, as in | |
254 this example: | |
255 | |
256 @example | |
257 @group | |
258 ((lambda (a b c) (+ a b c)) | |
259 1 (* 2 3) (- 5 4)) | |
260 @end group | |
261 @end example | |
262 | |
263 @noindent | |
264 This evaluates the arguments @code{1}, @code{(* 2 3)}, and @code{(- 5 | |
265 4)} from left to right. Then it applies the lambda expression to the | |
266 argument values 1, 6 and 1 to produce the value 8. | |
267 | |
268 It is not often useful to write a lambda expression as the @sc{car} of | |
269 a form in this way. You can get the same result, of making local | |
4905
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
270 variables and giving them values, using the special operator @code{let} |
428 | 271 (@pxref{Local Variables}). And @code{let} is clearer and easier to use. |
272 In practice, lambda expressions are either stored as the function | |
273 definitions of symbols, to produce named functions, or passed as | |
274 arguments to other functions (@pxref{Anonymous Functions}). | |
275 | |
276 However, calls to explicit lambda expressions were very useful in the | |
4905
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
277 old days of Lisp, before the special operator @code{let} was invented. At |
428 | 278 that time, they were the only way to bind and initialize local |
279 variables. | |
280 | |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
281 @node Argument List, Function Documentation, Simple Lambda, Lambda Expressions |
428 | 282 @subsection Advanced Features of Argument Lists |
283 @kindex wrong-number-of-arguments | |
284 @cindex argument binding | |
285 @cindex binding arguments | |
286 | |
287 Our simple sample function, @code{(lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))}, | |
288 specifies three argument variables, so it must be called with three | |
289 arguments: if you try to call it with only two arguments or four | |
290 arguments, you get a @code{wrong-number-of-arguments} error. | |
291 | |
292 It is often convenient to write a function that allows certain | |
5089
99f8ebc082d9
Make #'substring an alias of #'subseq; give the latter the byte code.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
4905
diff
changeset
|
293 arguments to be omitted. For example, the function @code{subseq} |
99f8ebc082d9
Make #'substring an alias of #'subseq; give the latter the byte code.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
4905
diff
changeset
|
294 accepts three arguments---a sequence, the start index and the end |
428 | 295 index---but the third argument defaults to the @var{length} of the |
5089
99f8ebc082d9
Make #'substring an alias of #'subseq; give the latter the byte code.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
4905
diff
changeset
|
296 sequence if you omit it. It is also convenient for certain functions to |
428 | 297 accept an indefinite number of arguments, as the functions @code{list} |
298 and @code{+} do. | |
299 | |
300 @cindex optional arguments | |
301 @cindex rest arguments | |
302 @kindex &optional | |
303 @kindex &rest | |
304 To specify optional arguments that may be omitted when a function | |
305 is called, simply include the keyword @code{&optional} before the optional | |
306 arguments. To specify a list of zero or more extra arguments, include the | |
307 keyword @code{&rest} before one final argument. | |
308 | |
309 Thus, the complete syntax for an argument list is as follows: | |
310 | |
311 @example | |
312 @group | |
313 (@var{required-vars}@dots{} | |
314 @r{[}&optional @var{optional-vars}@dots{}@r{]} | |
315 @r{[}&rest @var{rest-var}@r{]}) | |
316 @end group | |
317 @end example | |
318 | |
319 @noindent | |
320 The square brackets indicate that the @code{&optional} and @code{&rest} | |
321 clauses, and the variables that follow them, are optional. | |
322 | |
323 A call to the function requires one actual argument for each of the | |
324 @var{required-vars}. There may be actual arguments for zero or more of | |
325 the @var{optional-vars}, and there cannot be any actual arguments beyond | |
326 that unless the lambda list uses @code{&rest}. In that case, there may | |
327 be any number of extra actual arguments. | |
328 | |
329 If actual arguments for the optional and rest variables are omitted, | |
330 then they always default to @code{nil}. There is no way for the | |
331 function to distinguish between an explicit argument of @code{nil} and | |
332 an omitted argument. However, the body of the function is free to | |
333 consider @code{nil} an abbreviation for some other meaningful value. | |
5089
99f8ebc082d9
Make #'substring an alias of #'subseq; give the latter the byte code.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
4905
diff
changeset
|
334 This is what @code{subseq} does; @code{nil} as the third argument to |
99f8ebc082d9
Make #'substring an alias of #'subseq; give the latter the byte code.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
4905
diff
changeset
|
335 @code{subseq} means to use the length of the sequence supplied. |
428 | 336 |
337 @cindex CL note---default optional arg | |
338 @quotation | |
339 @b{Common Lisp note:} Common Lisp allows the function to specify what | |
5361
62b9ef1ed4ac
Change "special form" to "special operator" in the manuals, too
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
5089
diff
changeset
|
340 default value to use when an optional argument is omitted; this is |
62b9ef1ed4ac
Change "special form" to "special operator" in the manuals, too
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
5089
diff
changeset
|
341 available in XEmacs Lisp with the @code{defun*} macro, an alternative to |
62b9ef1ed4ac
Change "special form" to "special operator" in the manuals, too
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
5089
diff
changeset
|
342 @code{defun}. |
428 | 343 @end quotation |
344 | |
345 For example, an argument list that looks like this: | |
346 | |
347 @example | |
348 (a b &optional c d &rest e) | |
349 @end example | |
350 | |
351 @noindent | |
352 binds @code{a} and @code{b} to the first two actual arguments, which are | |
353 required. If one or two more arguments are provided, @code{c} and | |
354 @code{d} are bound to them respectively; any arguments after the first | |
355 four are collected into a list and @code{e} is bound to that list. If | |
356 there are only two arguments, @code{c} is @code{nil}; if two or three | |
357 arguments, @code{d} is @code{nil}; if four arguments or fewer, @code{e} | |
358 is @code{nil}. | |
359 | |
360 There is no way to have required arguments following optional | |
361 ones---it would not make sense. To see why this must be so, suppose | |
362 that @code{c} in the example were optional and @code{d} were required. | |
363 Suppose three actual arguments are given; which variable would the third | |
364 argument be for? Similarly, it makes no sense to have any more | |
365 arguments (either required or optional) after a @code{&rest} argument. | |
366 | |
367 Here are some examples of argument lists and proper calls: | |
368 | |
369 @smallexample | |
370 ((lambda (n) (1+ n)) ; @r{One required:} | |
371 1) ; @r{requires exactly one argument.} | |
372 @result{} 2 | |
373 ((lambda (n &optional n1) ; @r{One required and one optional:} | |
374 (if n1 (+ n n1) (1+ n))) ; @r{1 or 2 arguments.} | |
375 1 2) | |
376 @result{} 3 | |
377 ((lambda (n &rest ns) ; @r{One required and one rest:} | |
378 (+ n (apply '+ ns))) ; @r{1 or more arguments.} | |
379 1 2 3 4 5) | |
380 @result{} 15 | |
381 @end smallexample | |
382 | |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
383 @node Function Documentation, , Argument List, Lambda Expressions |
428 | 384 @subsection Documentation Strings of Functions |
385 @cindex documentation of function | |
386 | |
387 A lambda expression may optionally have a @dfn{documentation string} just | |
388 after the lambda list. This string does not affect execution of the | |
389 function; it is a kind of comment, but a systematized comment which | |
390 actually appears inside the Lisp world and can be used by the XEmacs help | |
391 facilities. @xref{Documentation}, for how the @var{documentation-string} is | |
392 accessed. | |
393 | |
394 It is a good idea to provide documentation strings for all the | |
395 functions in your program, even those that are only called from within | |
396 your program. Documentation strings are like comments, except that they | |
397 are easier to access. | |
398 | |
399 The first line of the documentation string should stand on its own, | |
400 because @code{apropos} displays just this first line. It should consist | |
401 of one or two complete sentences that summarize the function's purpose. | |
402 | |
403 The start of the documentation string is usually indented in the source file, | |
404 but since these spaces come before the starting double-quote, they are not part of | |
405 the string. Some people make a practice of indenting any additional | |
406 lines of the string so that the text lines up in the program source. | |
407 @emph{This is a mistake.} The indentation of the following lines is | |
408 inside the string; what looks nice in the source code will look ugly | |
409 when displayed by the help commands. | |
410 | |
411 You may wonder how the documentation string could be optional, since | |
412 there are required components of the function that follow it (the body). | |
413 Since evaluation of a string returns that string, without any side effects, | |
414 it has no effect if it is not the last form in the body. Thus, in | |
415 practice, there is no confusion between the first form of the body and the | |
416 documentation string; if the only body form is a string then it serves both | |
417 as the return value and as the documentation. | |
418 | |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
419 @node Function Names, Defining Functions, Lambda Expressions, Functions and Commands |
428 | 420 @section Naming a Function |
421 @cindex function definition | |
422 @cindex named function | |
423 @cindex function name | |
424 | |
425 In most computer languages, every function has a name; the idea of a | |
426 function without a name is nonsensical. In Lisp, a function in the | |
427 strictest sense has no name. It is simply a list whose first element is | |
428 @code{lambda}, or a primitive subr-object. | |
429 | |
430 However, a symbol can serve as the name of a function. This happens | |
431 when you put the function in the symbol's @dfn{function cell} | |
432 (@pxref{Symbol Components}). Then the symbol itself becomes a valid, | |
433 callable function, equivalent to the list or subr-object that its | |
434 function cell refers to. The contents of the function cell are also | |
435 called the symbol's @dfn{function definition}. The procedure of using a | |
436 symbol's function definition in place of the symbol is called | |
437 @dfn{symbol function indirection}; see @ref{Function Indirection}. | |
438 | |
439 In practice, nearly all functions are given names in this way and | |
440 referred to through their names. For example, the symbol @code{car} works | |
441 as a function and does what it does because the primitive subr-object | |
442 @code{#<subr car>} is stored in its function cell. | |
443 | |
444 We give functions names because it is convenient to refer to them by | |
445 their names in Lisp expressions. For primitive subr-objects such as | |
446 @code{#<subr car>}, names are the only way you can refer to them: there | |
447 is no read syntax for such objects. For functions written in Lisp, the | |
448 name is more convenient to use in a call than an explicit lambda | |
449 expression. Also, a function with a name can refer to itself---it can | |
450 be recursive. Writing the function's name in its own definition is much | |
451 more convenient than making the function definition point to itself | |
452 (something that is not impossible but that has various disadvantages in | |
453 practice). | |
454 | |
455 We often identify functions with the symbols used to name them. For | |
456 example, we often speak of ``the function @code{car}'', not | |
457 distinguishing between the symbol @code{car} and the primitive | |
458 subr-object that is its function definition. For most purposes, there | |
459 is no need to distinguish. | |
460 | |
461 Even so, keep in mind that a function need not have a unique name. While | |
462 a given function object @emph{usually} appears in the function cell of only | |
463 one symbol, this is just a matter of convenience. It is easy to store | |
464 it in several symbols using @code{fset}; then each of the symbols is | |
465 equally well a name for the same function. | |
466 | |
467 A symbol used as a function name may also be used as a variable; | |
468 these two uses of a symbol are independent and do not conflict. | |
469 | |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
470 @node Defining Functions, Calling Functions, Function Names, Functions and Commands |
428 | 471 @section Defining Functions |
472 @cindex defining a function | |
473 | |
474 We usually give a name to a function when it is first created. This | |
475 is called @dfn{defining a function}, and it is done with the | |
4905
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
476 @code{defun} special operator. |
428 | 477 |
5361
62b9ef1ed4ac
Change "special form" to "special operator" in the manuals, too
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
5089
diff
changeset
|
478 @deffn {Special Operator} defun name argument-list body-forms |
428 | 479 @code{defun} is the usual way to define new Lisp functions. It |
480 defines the symbol @var{name} as a function that looks like this: | |
481 | |
482 @example | |
483 (lambda @var{argument-list} . @var{body-forms}) | |
484 @end example | |
485 | |
486 @code{defun} stores this lambda expression in the function cell of | |
487 @var{name}. It returns the value @var{name}, but usually we ignore this | |
488 value. | |
489 | |
490 As described previously (@pxref{Lambda Expressions}), | |
491 @var{argument-list} is a list of argument names and may include the | |
492 keywords @code{&optional} and @code{&rest}. Also, the first two forms | |
493 in @var{body-forms} may be a documentation string and an interactive | |
494 declaration. | |
495 | |
496 There is no conflict if the same symbol @var{name} is also used as a | |
497 variable, since the symbol's value cell is independent of the function | |
498 cell. @xref{Symbol Components}. | |
499 | |
500 Here are some examples: | |
501 | |
502 @example | |
503 @group | |
504 (defun foo () 5) | |
505 @result{} foo | |
506 @end group | |
507 @group | |
508 (foo) | |
509 @result{} 5 | |
510 @end group | |
511 | |
512 @group | |
513 (defun bar (a &optional b &rest c) | |
514 (list a b c)) | |
515 @result{} bar | |
516 @end group | |
517 @group | |
518 (bar 1 2 3 4 5) | |
519 @result{} (1 2 (3 4 5)) | |
520 @end group | |
521 @group | |
522 (bar 1) | |
523 @result{} (1 nil nil) | |
524 @end group | |
525 @group | |
526 (bar) | |
527 @error{} Wrong number of arguments. | |
528 @end group | |
529 | |
530 @group | |
531 (defun capitalize-backwards () | |
532 "Upcase the last letter of a word." | |
533 (interactive) | |
534 (backward-word 1) | |
535 (forward-word 1) | |
536 (backward-char 1) | |
537 (capitalize-word 1)) | |
538 @result{} capitalize-backwards | |
539 @end group | |
540 @end example | |
541 | |
542 Be careful not to redefine existing functions unintentionally. | |
543 @code{defun} redefines even primitive functions such as @code{car} | |
544 without any hesitation or notification. Redefining a function already | |
545 defined is often done deliberately, and there is no way to distinguish | |
546 deliberate redefinition from unintentional redefinition. | |
5361
62b9ef1ed4ac
Change "special form" to "special operator" in the manuals, too
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
5089
diff
changeset
|
547 @end deffn |
428 | 548 |
549 @defun define-function name definition | |
550 @defunx defalias name definition | |
4905
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
551 These equivalent primitives define the symbol @var{name} as a |
428 | 552 function, with definition @var{definition} (which can be any valid Lisp |
553 function). | |
554 | |
555 The proper place to use @code{define-function} or @code{defalias} is | |
556 where a specific function name is being defined---especially where that | |
557 name appears explicitly in the source file being loaded. This is | |
558 because @code{define-function} and @code{defalias} record which file | |
559 defined the function, just like @code{defun}. | |
560 (@pxref{Unloading}). | |
561 | |
562 By contrast, in programs that manipulate function definitions for other | |
563 purposes, it is better to use @code{fset}, which does not keep such | |
564 records. | |
565 @end defun | |
566 | |
567 See also @code{defsubst}, which defines a function like @code{defun} | |
568 and tells the Lisp compiler to open-code it. @xref{Inline Functions}. | |
569 | |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
570 @node Calling Functions, Mapping Functions, Defining Functions, Functions and Commands |
428 | 571 @section Calling Functions |
572 @cindex function invocation | |
573 @cindex calling a function | |
574 | |
575 Defining functions is only half the battle. Functions don't do | |
576 anything until you @dfn{call} them, i.e., tell them to run. Calling a | |
577 function is also known as @dfn{invocation}. | |
578 | |
579 The most common way of invoking a function is by evaluating a list. | |
580 For example, evaluating the list @code{(concat "a" "b")} calls the | |
581 function @code{concat} with arguments @code{"a"} and @code{"b"}. | |
582 @xref{Evaluation}, for a description of evaluation. | |
583 | |
584 When you write a list as an expression in your program, the function | |
585 name is part of the program. This means that you choose which function | |
586 to call, and how many arguments to give it, when you write the program. | |
587 Usually that's just what you want. Occasionally you need to decide at | |
588 run time which function to call. To do that, use the functions | |
589 @code{funcall} and @code{apply}. | |
590 | |
591 @defun funcall function &rest arguments | |
592 @code{funcall} calls @var{function} with @var{arguments}, and returns | |
593 whatever @var{function} returns. | |
594 | |
595 Since @code{funcall} is a function, all of its arguments, including | |
596 @var{function}, are evaluated before @code{funcall} is called. This | |
597 means that you can use any expression to obtain the function to be | |
598 called. It also means that @code{funcall} does not see the expressions | |
599 you write for the @var{arguments}, only their values. These values are | |
600 @emph{not} evaluated a second time in the act of calling @var{function}; | |
601 @code{funcall} enters the normal procedure for calling a function at the | |
602 place where the arguments have already been evaluated. | |
603 | |
604 The argument @var{function} must be either a Lisp function or a | |
4905
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
605 primitive function. Special operators and macros are not allowed, because |
428 | 606 they make sense only when given the ``unevaluated'' argument |
607 expressions. @code{funcall} cannot provide these because, as we saw | |
608 above, it never knows them in the first place. | |
609 | |
610 @example | |
611 @group | |
612 (setq f 'list) | |
613 @result{} list | |
614 @end group | |
615 @group | |
616 (funcall f 'x 'y 'z) | |
617 @result{} (x y z) | |
618 @end group | |
619 @group | |
620 (funcall f 'x 'y '(z)) | |
621 @result{} (x y (z)) | |
622 @end group | |
623 @group | |
624 (funcall 'and t nil) | |
625 @error{} Invalid function: #<subr and> | |
626 @end group | |
627 @end example | |
628 | |
629 Compare these example with the examples of @code{apply}. | |
630 @end defun | |
631 | |
632 @defun apply function &rest arguments | |
633 @code{apply} calls @var{function} with @var{arguments}, just like | |
634 @code{funcall} but with one difference: the last of @var{arguments} is a | |
635 list of arguments to give to @var{function}, rather than a single | |
636 argument. We also say that @code{apply} @dfn{spreads} this list so that | |
637 each individual element becomes an argument. | |
638 | |
639 @code{apply} returns the result of calling @var{function}. As with | |
640 @code{funcall}, @var{function} must either be a Lisp function or a | |
4905
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
641 primitive function; special operators and macros do not make sense in |
428 | 642 @code{apply}. |
643 | |
644 @example | |
645 @group | |
646 (setq f 'list) | |
647 @result{} list | |
648 @end group | |
649 @group | |
650 (apply f 'x 'y 'z) | |
651 @error{} Wrong type argument: listp, z | |
652 @end group | |
653 @group | |
654 (apply '+ 1 2 '(3 4)) | |
655 @result{} 10 | |
656 @end group | |
657 @group | |
658 (apply '+ '(1 2 3 4)) | |
659 @result{} 10 | |
660 @end group | |
661 | |
662 @group | |
663 (apply 'append '((a b c) nil (x y z) nil)) | |
664 @result{} (a b c x y z) | |
665 @end group | |
666 @end example | |
667 | |
668 For an interesting example of using @code{apply}, see the description of | |
669 @code{mapcar}, in @ref{Mapping Functions}. | |
670 @end defun | |
671 | |
672 @cindex functionals | |
673 It is common for Lisp functions to accept functions as arguments or | |
674 find them in data structures (especially in hook variables and property | |
675 lists) and call them using @code{funcall} or @code{apply}. Functions | |
676 that accept function arguments are often called @dfn{functionals}. | |
677 | |
678 Sometimes, when you call a functional, it is useful to supply a no-op | |
679 function as the argument. Here are two different kinds of no-op | |
680 function: | |
681 | |
682 @defun identity arg | |
683 This function returns @var{arg} and has no side effects. | |
684 @end defun | |
685 | |
444 | 686 @deffn Command ignore &rest args |
428 | 687 This function ignores any arguments and returns @code{nil}. |
444 | 688 @end deffn |
428 | 689 |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
690 @node Mapping Functions, Anonymous Functions, Calling Functions, Functions and Commands |
428 | 691 @section Mapping Functions |
692 @cindex mapping functions | |
693 | |
694 A @dfn{mapping function} applies a given function to each element of a | |
434 | 695 list or other collection. XEmacs Lisp has several such functions; |
428 | 696 @code{mapcar} and @code{mapconcat}, which scan a list, are described |
434 | 697 here. @xref{Creating Symbols}, for the function @code{mapatoms} which |
698 maps over the symbols in an obarray. | |
699 | |
700 Mapping functions should never modify the sequence being mapped over. | |
701 The results are unpredictable. | |
428 | 702 |
703 @defun mapcar function sequence | |
704 @code{mapcar} applies @var{function} to each element of @var{sequence} | |
705 in turn, and returns a list of the results. | |
706 | |
434 | 707 The argument @var{sequence} can be any kind of sequence; that is, a |
708 list, a vector, a bit vector, or a string. The result is always a list. | |
709 The length of the result is the same as the length of @var{sequence}. | |
428 | 710 |
711 @smallexample | |
712 @group | |
713 @exdent @r{For example:} | |
714 | |
715 (mapcar 'car '((a b) (c d) (e f))) | |
716 @result{} (a c e) | |
717 (mapcar '1+ [1 2 3]) | |
718 @result{} (2 3 4) | |
719 (mapcar 'char-to-string "abc") | |
720 @result{} ("a" "b" "c") | |
721 @end group | |
722 | |
723 @group | |
724 ;; @r{Call each function in @code{my-hooks}.} | |
725 (mapcar 'funcall my-hooks) | |
726 @end group | |
727 | |
728 @group | |
729 (defun mapcar* (f &rest args) | |
730 "Apply FUNCTION to successive cars of all ARGS. | |
731 Return the list of results." | |
732 ;; @r{If no list is exhausted,} | |
444 | 733 (if (not (memq 'nil args)) |
428 | 734 ;; @r{apply function to @sc{car}s.} |
444 | 735 (cons (apply f (mapcar 'car args)) |
736 (apply 'mapcar* f | |
428 | 737 ;; @r{Recurse for rest of elements.} |
738 (mapcar 'cdr args))))) | |
739 @end group | |
740 | |
741 @group | |
742 (mapcar* 'cons '(a b c) '(1 2 3 4)) | |
743 @result{} ((a . 1) (b . 2) (c . 3)) | |
744 @end group | |
745 @end smallexample | |
746 @end defun | |
747 | |
748 @defun mapconcat function sequence separator | |
749 @code{mapconcat} applies @var{function} to each element of | |
750 @var{sequence}: the results, which must be strings, are concatenated. | |
751 Between each pair of result strings, @code{mapconcat} inserts the string | |
752 @var{separator}. Usually @var{separator} contains a space or comma or | |
753 other suitable punctuation. | |
754 | |
755 The argument @var{function} must be a function that can take one | |
434 | 756 argument and return a string. The argument @var{sequence} can be any |
757 kind of sequence; that is, a list, a vector, a bit vector, or a string. | |
444 | 758 |
428 | 759 @smallexample |
760 @group | |
761 (mapconcat 'symbol-name | |
762 '(The cat in the hat) | |
763 " ") | |
764 @result{} "The cat in the hat" | |
765 @end group | |
766 | |
767 @group | |
768 (mapconcat (function (lambda (x) (format "%c" (1+ x)))) | |
769 "HAL-8000" | |
770 "") | |
771 @result{} "IBM.9111" | |
772 @end group | |
773 @end smallexample | |
774 @end defun | |
775 | |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
776 @node Anonymous Functions, Function Cells, Mapping Functions, Functions and Commands |
428 | 777 @section Anonymous Functions |
778 @cindex anonymous function | |
779 | |
780 In Lisp, a function is a list that starts with @code{lambda}, a | |
781 byte-code function compiled from such a list, or alternatively a | |
782 primitive subr-object; names are ``extra''. Although usually functions | |
783 are defined with @code{defun} and given names at the same time, it is | |
784 occasionally more concise to use an explicit lambda expression---an | |
785 anonymous function. Such a list is valid wherever a function name is. | |
786 | |
787 Any method of creating such a list makes a valid function. Even this: | |
788 | |
789 @smallexample | |
790 @group | |
791 (setq silly (append '(lambda (x)) (list (list '+ (* 3 4) 'x)))) | |
792 @result{} (lambda (x) (+ 12 x)) | |
793 @end group | |
794 @end smallexample | |
795 | |
796 @noindent | |
797 This computes a list that looks like @code{(lambda (x) (+ 12 x))} and | |
798 makes it the value (@emph{not} the function definition!) of | |
799 @code{silly}. | |
800 | |
801 Here is how we might call this function: | |
802 | |
803 @example | |
804 @group | |
805 (funcall silly 1) | |
806 @result{} 13 | |
807 @end group | |
808 @end example | |
809 | |
810 @noindent | |
811 (It does @emph{not} work to write @code{(silly 1)}, because this function | |
812 is not the @emph{function definition} of @code{silly}. We have not given | |
813 @code{silly} any function definition, just a value as a variable.) | |
814 | |
815 Most of the time, anonymous functions are constants that appear in | |
816 your program. For example, you might want to pass one as an argument | |
817 to the function @code{mapcar}, which applies any given function to each | |
818 element of a list. Here we pass an anonymous function that multiplies | |
819 a number by two: | |
820 | |
821 @example | |
822 @group | |
823 (defun double-each (list) | |
824 (mapcar '(lambda (x) (* 2 x)) list)) | |
825 @result{} double-each | |
826 @end group | |
827 @group | |
828 (double-each '(2 11)) | |
829 @result{} (4 22) | |
830 @end group | |
831 @end example | |
832 | |
833 @noindent | |
4905
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
834 In such cases, we usually use the special operator @code{function} instead |
428 | 835 of simple quotation to quote the anonymous function. |
836 | |
5361
62b9ef1ed4ac
Change "special form" to "special operator" in the manuals, too
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
5089
diff
changeset
|
837 @deffn {Special Operator} function function-object |
428 | 838 @cindex function quoting |
4905
755ae5b97edb
Change "special form" to "special operator" in our sources.
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
2492
diff
changeset
|
839 This special operator returns @var{function-object} without evaluating it. |
428 | 840 In this, it is equivalent to @code{quote}. However, it serves as a |
841 note to the XEmacs Lisp compiler that @var{function-object} is intended | |
842 to be used only as a function, and therefore can safely be compiled. | |
843 Contrast this with @code{quote}, in @ref{Quoting}. | |
5361
62b9ef1ed4ac
Change "special form" to "special operator" in the manuals, too
Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
parents:
5089
diff
changeset
|
844 @end deffn |
428 | 845 |
846 Using @code{function} instead of @code{quote} makes a difference | |
847 inside a function or macro that you are going to compile. For example: | |
848 | |
849 @example | |
850 @group | |
851 (defun double-each (list) | |
852 (mapcar (function (lambda (x) (* 2 x))) list)) | |
853 @result{} double-each | |
854 @end group | |
855 @group | |
856 (double-each '(2 11)) | |
857 @result{} (4 22) | |
858 @end group | |
859 @end example | |
860 | |
861 @noindent | |
862 If this definition of @code{double-each} is compiled, the anonymous | |
863 function is compiled as well. By contrast, in the previous definition | |
864 where ordinary @code{quote} is used, the argument passed to | |
865 @code{mapcar} is the precise list shown: | |
866 | |
867 @example | |
868 (lambda (x) (* x 2)) | |
869 @end example | |
870 | |
871 @noindent | |
872 The Lisp compiler cannot assume this list is a function, even though it | |
873 looks like one, since it does not know what @code{mapcar} does with the | |
874 list. Perhaps @code{mapcar} will check that the @sc{car} of the third | |
875 element is the symbol @code{*}! The advantage of @code{function} is | |
876 that it tells the compiler to go ahead and compile the constant | |
877 function. | |
878 | |
879 We sometimes write @code{function} instead of @code{quote} when | |
880 quoting the name of a function, but this usage is just a sort of | |
881 comment. | |
882 | |
883 @example | |
884 (function @var{symbol}) @equiv{} (quote @var{symbol}) @equiv{} '@var{symbol} | |
885 @end example | |
886 | |
887 See @code{documentation} in @ref{Accessing Documentation}, for a | |
888 realistic example using @code{function} and an anonymous function. | |
889 | |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
890 @node Function Cells, Inline Functions, Anonymous Functions, Functions and Commands |
428 | 891 @section Accessing Function Cell Contents |
892 | |
893 The @dfn{function definition} of a symbol is the object stored in the | |
894 function cell of the symbol. The functions described here access, test, | |
895 and set the function cell of symbols. | |
896 | |
897 See also the function @code{indirect-function} in @ref{Function | |
898 Indirection}. | |
899 | |
900 @defun symbol-function symbol | |
901 @kindex void-function | |
902 This returns the object in the function cell of @var{symbol}. If the | |
903 symbol's function cell is void, a @code{void-function} error is | |
904 signaled. | |
905 | |
906 This function does not check that the returned object is a legitimate | |
907 function. | |
908 | |
909 @example | |
910 @group | |
911 (defun bar (n) (+ n 2)) | |
912 @result{} bar | |
913 @end group | |
914 @group | |
915 (symbol-function 'bar) | |
916 @result{} (lambda (n) (+ n 2)) | |
917 @end group | |
918 @group | |
919 (fset 'baz 'bar) | |
920 @result{} bar | |
921 @end group | |
922 @group | |
923 (symbol-function 'baz) | |
924 @result{} bar | |
925 @end group | |
926 @end example | |
927 @end defun | |
928 | |
929 @cindex void function cell | |
930 If you have never given a symbol any function definition, we say that | |
931 that symbol's function cell is @dfn{void}. In other words, the function | |
932 cell does not have any Lisp object in it. If you try to call such a symbol | |
933 as a function, it signals a @code{void-function} error. | |
934 | |
935 Note that void is not the same as @code{nil} or the symbol | |
936 @code{void}. The symbols @code{nil} and @code{void} are Lisp objects, | |
937 and can be stored into a function cell just as any other object can be | |
938 (and they can be valid functions if you define them in turn with | |
939 @code{defun}). A void function cell contains no object whatsoever. | |
940 | |
941 You can test the voidness of a symbol's function definition with | |
942 @code{fboundp}. After you have given a symbol a function definition, you | |
943 can make it void once more using @code{fmakunbound}. | |
944 | |
945 @defun fboundp symbol | |
444 | 946 This function returns @code{t} if @var{symbol} has an object in its |
428 | 947 function cell, @code{nil} otherwise. It does not check that the object |
948 is a legitimate function. | |
949 @end defun | |
950 | |
951 @defun fmakunbound symbol | |
952 This function makes @var{symbol}'s function cell void, so that a | |
953 subsequent attempt to access this cell will cause a @code{void-function} | |
954 error. (See also @code{makunbound}, in @ref{Local Variables}.) | |
955 | |
956 @example | |
957 @group | |
958 (defun foo (x) x) | |
959 @result{} x | |
960 @end group | |
961 @group | |
962 (foo 1) | |
963 @result{}1 | |
964 @end group | |
965 @group | |
966 (fmakunbound 'foo) | |
967 @result{} x | |
968 @end group | |
969 @group | |
970 (foo 1) | |
971 @error{} Symbol's function definition is void: foo | |
972 @end group | |
973 @end example | |
974 @end defun | |
975 | |
976 @defun fset symbol object | |
977 This function stores @var{object} in the function cell of @var{symbol}. | |
978 The result is @var{object}. Normally @var{object} should be a function | |
979 or the name of a function, but this is not checked. | |
980 | |
981 There are three normal uses of this function: | |
982 | |
983 @itemize @bullet | |
984 @item | |
985 Copying one symbol's function definition to another. (In other words, | |
986 making an alternate name for a function.) | |
987 | |
988 @item | |
989 Giving a symbol a function definition that is not a list and therefore | |
990 cannot be made with @code{defun}. For example, you can use @code{fset} | |
444 | 991 to give a symbol @var{symbol1} a function definition which is another symbol |
992 @var{symbol2}; then @var{symbol1} serves as an alias for whatever definition | |
993 @var{symbol2} presently has. | |
428 | 994 |
995 @item | |
996 In constructs for defining or altering functions. If @code{defun} | |
997 were not a primitive, it could be written in Lisp (as a macro) using | |
998 @code{fset}. | |
999 @end itemize | |
1000 | |
1001 Here are examples of the first two uses: | |
1002 | |
1003 @example | |
1004 @group | |
1005 ;; @r{Give @code{first} the same definition @code{car} has.} | |
1006 (fset 'first (symbol-function 'car)) | |
1007 @result{} #<subr car> | |
1008 @end group | |
1009 @group | |
1010 (first '(1 2 3)) | |
1011 @result{} 1 | |
1012 @end group | |
1013 | |
1014 @group | |
1015 ;; @r{Make the symbol @code{car} the function definition of @code{xfirst}.} | |
1016 (fset 'xfirst 'car) | |
1017 @result{} car | |
1018 @end group | |
1019 @group | |
1020 (xfirst '(1 2 3)) | |
1021 @result{} 1 | |
1022 @end group | |
1023 @group | |
1024 (symbol-function 'xfirst) | |
1025 @result{} car | |
1026 @end group | |
1027 @group | |
1028 (symbol-function (symbol-function 'xfirst)) | |
1029 @result{} #<subr car> | |
1030 @end group | |
1031 | |
1032 @group | |
1033 ;; @r{Define a named keyboard macro.} | |
1034 (fset 'kill-two-lines "\^u2\^k") | |
1035 @result{} "\^u2\^k" | |
1036 @end group | |
1037 @end example | |
1038 | |
1039 See also the related functions @code{define-function} and | |
1040 @code{defalias}, in @ref{Defining Functions}. | |
1041 @end defun | |
1042 | |
1043 When writing a function that extends a previously defined function, | |
1044 the following idiom is sometimes used: | |
1045 | |
1046 @example | |
1047 (fset 'old-foo (symbol-function 'foo)) | |
1048 (defun foo () | |
1049 "Just like old-foo, except more so." | |
1050 @group | |
1051 (old-foo) | |
1052 (more-so)) | |
1053 @end group | |
1054 @end example | |
1055 | |
1056 @noindent | |
1057 This does not work properly if @code{foo} has been defined to autoload. | |
1058 In such a case, when @code{foo} calls @code{old-foo}, Lisp attempts | |
1059 to define @code{old-foo} by loading a file. Since this presumably | |
1060 defines @code{foo} rather than @code{old-foo}, it does not produce the | |
1061 proper results. The only way to avoid this problem is to make sure the | |
1062 file is loaded before moving aside the old definition of @code{foo}. | |
1063 | |
1064 But it is unmodular and unclean, in any case, for a Lisp file to | |
1065 redefine a function defined elsewhere. | |
1066 | |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
1067 @node Inline Functions, Related Topics, Function Cells, Functions and Commands |
428 | 1068 @section Inline Functions |
1069 @cindex inline functions | |
1070 | |
1071 @findex defsubst | |
1072 You can define an @dfn{inline function} by using @code{defsubst} instead | |
1073 of @code{defun}. An inline function works just like an ordinary | |
1074 function except for one thing: when you compile a call to the function, | |
1075 the function's definition is open-coded into the caller. | |
1076 | |
1077 Making a function inline makes explicit calls run faster. But it also | |
1078 has disadvantages. For one thing, it reduces flexibility; if you change | |
1079 the definition of the function, calls already inlined still use the old | |
1080 definition until you recompile them. Since the flexibility of | |
1081 redefining functions is an important feature of XEmacs, you should not | |
1082 make a function inline unless its speed is really crucial. | |
1083 | |
1084 Another disadvantage is that making a large function inline can increase | |
1085 the size of compiled code both in files and in memory. Since the speed | |
1086 advantage of inline functions is greatest for small functions, you | |
1087 generally should not make large functions inline. | |
1088 | |
1089 It's possible to define a macro to expand into the same code that an | |
1090 inline function would execute. But the macro would have a limitation: | |
1091 you can use it only explicitly---a macro cannot be called with | |
1092 @code{apply}, @code{mapcar} and so on. Also, it takes some work to | |
1093 convert an ordinary function into a macro. (@xref{Macros}.) To convert | |
1094 it into an inline function is very easy; simply replace @code{defun} | |
1095 with @code{defsubst}. Since each argument of an inline function is | |
1096 evaluated exactly once, you needn't worry about how many times the | |
1097 body uses the arguments, as you do for macros. (@xref{Argument | |
1098 Evaluation}.) | |
1099 | |
1100 Inline functions can be used and open-coded later on in the same file, | |
1101 following the definition, just like macros. | |
1102 | |
1103 @c Emacs versions prior to 19 did not have inline functions. | |
1104 | |
5791
9fae6227ede5
Silence texinfo 5.2 warnings, primarily by adding next, prev, and up
Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>
parents:
5361
diff
changeset
|
1105 @node Related Topics, , Inline Functions, Functions and Commands |
428 | 1106 @section Other Topics Related to Functions |
1107 | |
1108 Here is a table of several functions that do things related to | |
1109 function calling and function definitions. They are documented | |
1110 elsewhere, but we provide cross references here. | |
1111 | |
1112 @table @code | |
1113 @item apply | |
1114 See @ref{Calling Functions}. | |
1115 | |
1116 @item autoload | |
1117 See @ref{Autoload}. | |
1118 | |
1119 @item call-interactively | |
1120 See @ref{Interactive Call}. | |
1121 | |
1122 @item commandp | |
1123 See @ref{Interactive Call}. | |
1124 | |
1125 @item documentation | |
1126 See @ref{Accessing Documentation}. | |
1127 | |
1128 @item eval | |
1129 See @ref{Eval}. | |
1130 | |
1131 @item funcall | |
1132 See @ref{Calling Functions}. | |
1133 | |
1134 @item ignore | |
1135 See @ref{Calling Functions}. | |
1136 | |
1137 @item indirect-function | |
1138 See @ref{Function Indirection}. | |
1139 | |
1140 @item interactive | |
1141 See @ref{Using Interactive}. | |
1142 | |
1143 @item interactive-p | |
1144 See @ref{Interactive Call}. | |
1145 | |
1146 @item mapatoms | |
1147 See @ref{Creating Symbols}. | |
1148 | |
1149 @item mapcar | |
1150 See @ref{Mapping Functions}. | |
1151 | |
1152 @item mapconcat | |
1153 See @ref{Mapping Functions}. | |
1154 | |
1155 @item undefined | |
1156 See @ref{Key Lookup}. | |
1157 @end table | |
1158 |