Mercurial > hg > rsof
changeset 353:e40a88f7113e
footnote, 3.1 done for now
author | Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:04:08 +0100 |
parents | f94493498cc6 |
children | a47144b6c809 |
files | QiS/What_are_QiS.xml |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/QiS/What_are_QiS.xml Fri Mar 29 21:17:31 2024 +0000 +++ b/QiS/What_are_QiS.xml Sun Mar 31 15:04:08 2024 +0100 @@ -6,13 +6,14 @@ <title>SESAM and the Quakers in Scotland proposal</title> <author>Henry S. Thompson</author> <date>29 Mar 2024</date> - <style>.alpha {list-style-type: lower-alpha}</style> + <style>.alpha {list-style-type: lower-alpha} + .footnote {width: 100%; font-size: 80%; float: none; clear: none}</style> </head> <body> <div> <title>Introduction</title> <p>I have struggled at the last two threshing meetings about the proposed - governing document (the version of 2024-03-21, hereafter GD) for + governing document (now version of 2024-03-21, hereafter GD) for Quakers in Scotland (<name>QiS</name>) to adequately convey my concerns. In writing this I'm attempting to do better, not only with respect to what I think is wrong, but also by suggesting how it could be fixed.</p> @@ -34,12 +35,12 @@ <p>I'll start by identifying the problems I see with the GD, and go on to outline the kind of changes I think would improve it, to the point where SESAM would support the creation of the <name>QiS-the-charity</name> and - would join <name>QiS-the-church</name>.</p> + would participate in <name>QiS-the-church</name>.</p> </div> <div> <title>A note on terminology</title> <p>In their cover letter for the draft GD sent to SESAM Trustees on -2024-01-06, the <name>QiS</name>-CG says</p> +2024-01-06, the <name>QiS</name> Coordinating Group says</p> <blockquote>"The Options for Scotland group [proposes] that we form a <emph>single charity</emph> and that we form a <emph>single body</emph>. The idea of a single body clearly needs more work to discern what this might look @@ -79,28 +80,22 @@ <p>These problems arise in large part because, perfectly understandably, <name>QiS</name>-CG evidently started with the template for governing documents for (English/Welsh) CIOs made available by Quaker Life -(https://www.quaker.org.uk/documents/cio-constitution-template-agreed-2014), -which embodies the same confusion.</p> +(<link href="https://www.quaker.org.uk/documents/cio-constitution-template-agreed-2014">https://www.quaker.org.uk/documents/cio-constitution-template-agreed-2014</link>), +which embodies the same confusion*.</p> <p>Indeed SESAM-the-charity's own governing document is also based on a similar, more recent, template for non-incorporated Area Meetings from Quaker Life -(https://www.quaker.org.uk/documents/governing-document-for-am-cc-approved-11-2022-final), -and so also suffers from these problems [footnote: East of Scotland AM -and North of Scotland AM's governing documents are also based on the -non-incorporated Area Meeting template. Stewardship of North of -Scotland Quaker Trust is identified as a responsibility of NSAM -Trustees in their Terms of Reference. West of Scotland's document is -shorter, and perhaps based on an early template, compared to the -others.]</p> +(<link href="https://www.quaker.org.uk/documents/governing-document-for-am-cc-approved-11-2022-final">https://www.quaker.org.uk/documents/governing-document-for-am-cc-approved-11-2022-final</link>), +and so also suffers from these problems.</p> <p>But <emph>why</emph> are these problems, and even granted that they are, why do they need to be fixed <emph>now</emph>?</p> <p>They are problems because the existing Area Meetings' responsibilities and activities as a worshiping body, governed by Meetings for Worship -for Church Affairs of their membership defined in QF&P, are largely +for Church Affairs of their membership as set out in QF&P, are largely distinct from their responsibilities and activities as a charity, governed by trustees. The former consist of, for example, the spiritual and -pastoral care of their members and their witness, grounded in our -testimonies, to their communities, whereas the latter focus on +pastoral care of their members and their witness to their communities, grounded in our +testimonies, whereas the latter focus on maitaining the Area Meeting's legal status and financial well-being. As for Britain Yearly Meeting, whose succinct self-characterisation recently has been "A simple church supported by a simple charity", so @@ -116,9 +111,16 @@ support the charitable objects of the Area Meeting, and without a clear understanding of how that will continue to be true once those assets are transferred to the <name>SCIO</name>, they would fail in that -responsibility, which the law expresses as "[they must] seek, in good +responsibility, which the law expresses as <span>"[they</span> must] seek, in good faith, to ensure that the charity acts in a manner which is consistent with its purposes".</p> + <note class="footnote">* East of Scotland AM +and North of Scotland AM's governing documents are also based on the +non-incorporated Area Meeting template. Stewardship of North of +Scotland Quaker Trust is identified as a responsibility of NSAM +Trustees in their Terms of Reference. West of Scotland's document is +shorter, and perhaps based on an early template, compared to the +others.</note> </div> <div> <title>The future of the Area Meeting(s)</title> @@ -170,7 +172,7 @@ Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers), Charity number: 1127633</p> <p>The governing document for the latter charity -(https://www.quaker.org.uk/documents/bym-governing-document-revised-min34-bym2014) +(<link href="https://www.quaker.org.uk/documents/bym-governing-document-revised-min34-bym2014">https://www.quaker.org.uk/documents/bym-governing-document-revised-min34-bym2014</link>) begins with the following definitions:</p> <list type="enum" class="alpha"> <item>The Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in Britain refers to @@ -207,7 +209,7 @@ (Quakers) [in Britain] East Scotland Area Meeting (abbreviated as East Scotland Area Meeting) is based on the template provided by Quaker Life - (https://www.quaker.org.uk/documents/governing-document-for-am-cc-approved-11-2022-final). + (<link href="https://www.quaker.org.uk/documents/governing-document-for-am-cc-approved-11-2022-final">https://www.quaker.org.uk/documents/governing-document-for-am-cc-approved-11-2022-final</link>). The template does not make any overt distinction between the church and the charity, to my embarassment. However the phrases "(East Scotland) Area Meeting in session" clearly refer to the church, and @@ -255,7 +257,7 @@ - Cymdeithas Grefyddol y Cyfeillion (Crynwyr) yng Nghymru a’r Gororau [know as Cynar] is a Charitable Incorporated Organisation (CIO, comparable to an <name>SCIO</name>). Its constitution (Linked from - https://www.symudymlaen2.org/) says that the members of the CIO are + <link href="https://www.symudymlaen2.org/">https://www.symudymlaen2.org/</link>) says that the members of the CIO are "all members of the Constituent Area Meetings". The constitution describes "General meetings of the members of the CIO", and mandates at least an Annual General Meeting. The clerks of the @@ -273,7 +275,7 @@ final report and accounts prepared, then they can be released by their respective AMs and leave the rest to [Cymar] to deal with."</p> <p> It's not clear to me how this accords with QF&P 4.02 - (https://qfp.quaker.org.uk/passage/4-02/) which says "Each area + (<link href="https://qfp.quaker.org.uk/passage/4-02/">https://qfp.quaker.org.uk/passage/4-02/</link>) which says "Each area meeting is a separate charitable entity and it may be required to be registered as such with the relevant charity regulator. Area meetings which are registered or preparing for registration will