# HG changeset patch # User Henry S. Thompson # Date 1711964016 -3600 # Node ID a47144b6c80993dd0902a668d7bac52c72151334 # Parent e40a88f7113ef90acc2fb1a85a5245f80566fe73 more-or-less complete, but needs restructured diff -r e40a88f7113e -r a47144b6c809 QiS/What_are_QiS.xml --- a/QiS/What_are_QiS.xml Sun Mar 31 15:04:08 2024 +0100 +++ b/QiS/What_are_QiS.xml Mon Apr 01 10:33:36 2024 +0100 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ SESAM and the Quakers in Scotland proposal Henry S. Thompson - 29 Mar 2024 + 1 April 2024 @@ -107,13 +107,17 @@ this. However, under Gospel Order, the ultimate authority will still lie with the gathered meeting."

This needs to be fixed now because it is laid on Area Meeting -trustees to manage the assets of the Area Meeting in such a was as to +trustees to manage the assets of the Area Meeting in such a way as to support the charitable objects of the Area Meeting, and without a clear understanding of how that will continue to be true once those assets are transferred to the SCIO, they would fail in that responsibility, which the law expresses as "[they must] seek, in good faith, to ensure that the charity acts in a manner which is consistent with its purposes".

+

More generally, the current lack of clarity on the governance +structure of QiS makes it impossible for the members of SESAM to know how and to what +extent they will have any say in what happens to their assets and property. +A clear separation between the RSFS and the SCIO is a simple first step towards the necessary clarification.

* East of Scotland AM and North of Scotland AM's governing documents are also based on the non-incorporated Area Meeting template. Stewardship of North of @@ -124,6 +128,43 @@
The future of the Area Meeting(s) +

The GD should make it explicit that in the first instance +the four Area Meetings, as well as General Meeting for Scotland, will +continue to exist and function after the creation of the +SCIO and the RSFS. These five will constitute the Constituent Meetings of the +RSFS.

+

The GD should specify that transfer from the Constituent Meetings

+ + their assets, properties and trusteeship to the SCIO + their spiritual and pastoral activities and responsibilities to the + RSFS + +

of will be at their discretion as to both timing and substance.

+

We feel strongly that many of our spiritual and pastoral activities +are best served in smaller constituencies that the RSFS. We +understand that some Area Meetings need to unburden themselves quickly +of some of their responsibilities, but we hope that they will wish to +retain some of them, particularly membership, pastoral care end +eldership.

+

Accordingly, the GD should make clear that for those things +not transfered to the SCIO and/or the RSFS, Constituent +Meetings will remain as parts of the Religious Society of Friends +(Britain), governed by the relevant parts of QF&P.

+
+
+Governance of the <name>RSFS</name> +

The GD should specify how the RSFS operates as a Quaker +Meeting. There should be an annual Meeting for Worship for Church Affairs open +to all members. At least in the short term the Clerks of the Constituent +Meetings should serve as the clerking team for this, with one of their number +actually serving as the Clerk on the day. Other Meetings could be held when +required. At least three representatives of each Constituent Meeting must be +present for any Meeting of the RSFS to be able to conduct +business.

+

The above is intended to allow for a structure for the governance of the +RSFS very like the way in which Yearly Meeting and +Meeting for Sufferings together provide governance for Britain Yearly Meeting +(the church).