# HG changeset patch # User ht # Date 1240698240 14400 # Node ID 537a0c9d28e60379994829e6b92eb04079d066e7 # Parent 9fa506a1a78080c074cf931ec2e021969eeb472e *** empty log message *** diff -r 9fa506a1a780 -r 537a0c9d28e6 7vt/Qu_Central Ed_Replies.doc Binary file 7vt/Qu_Central Ed_Replies.doc has changed diff -r 9fa506a1a780 -r 537a0c9d28e6 7vt/fmh_2009-04-24.html --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/7vt/fmh_2009-04-24.html Sat Apr 25 18:24:00 2009 -0400 @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@ + + +Future of 7 VT working group: Ninth meeting +
+

Future of 7 VT working group: Ninth meeting

+
This informal summary by Henry S. Thompson, Convenor
+
Held at 7 Victoria Terrace, Edinburgh on 24 April 2009, 5:30 p.m.
+
+ +
+

1. Attendance

+

Present: Alison Burnley, Madeleine Harding, +Phil Lucas, Brian Mayes, Laurie Naumann, Rufus Reade +Eileen Schott, Henry Thompson (in the clerk's chair)

+

Prevented: Eileen Schott

+
+
+

2. Status of form distribution/collection

+
+
Financial experts
LN has sent email summarising his telephone +interviews with Paul Kenny, Caroline Evens and John Phillips.
+
Lettings comparison
ES has done this, discussed last +time. Some more info to come re out-of-town sites.
+
Quaker groups
MH sent email with interim results, has now +gotten 12 replies, will re-circulate an updated tabulation
+
Central Edinburgh
HST has a substantial number of completed +forms, will tabulate and circulate this evening.
+
Midweek meeting
AB has tabulated the 8 returns she has received.
+
Local meetings
PL has had replies from S. Edinburgh and +Central Fife
+
MH staff
PL has only just received the individual +responses. He also has a "discerned corporate response" from a meeting of MH staff.
+
+
+
+

3. Additional input from the Meeting House Managers

+

We considered the question of whether we needed further input from the +Meeting House Managers. They have conveyed a concern that we do not yet fully +understand the nature of their work and the work of Meeting House staff. We +agreed that HST will invite the MHMs to our next meeting, at the beginning.

+
+
+

4. Financial experts interviews

+

LN summarised. Overall answers were fairly similar, although they were +arrived at by differing routes. All were enthusiastic about the property, +albeit in one case in part because it offered such an attractive proposition as +a rental property itself. None thought that selling was a good plan. Renting +for ourselves was judged to be beset with difficulties. Minimum lease would +likely be five years.

+

A point which came up was that more use means more cost to offset wear +and tear. The Festival is a particular case in point.

+

This is to some extent subject to manipulation: by stopping the +consumption of hot drinks in the Meeting Room, the wear and tear is reduced, +but the Library gets more use as a breakout room, thereby reducing the +opportunity for letting.

+

There was not complete unanimity on the question of whether we should or +could increase income by raising our letting rates.

+

The question of strategy: maximising income versus maximising utility for +Quaker use, comes up again. PL reminded us of the history of AM's decisions in +this area.

+

The proposition that we are subsidising groups by default was clarified: +we do charge a low rate to some groups, which means that if no-one +else was in the building by the time that group meets we end up losing money as +against the cost of opening the building.

+
+
+

5. Responses from Quaker Groups

+

Although not dependent as such, many groups expressed a sense of +ownership wrt 7VT. Overseers did feel dependent on 7VT as their base.

+

"The atmosphere can be felt when you walk into the place" like any other +religious place, so it's appropriate to meet here.

+

The opportunity to plan in advance, and thereby had access to resources, +was welcomed.

+

Groups were willing to meet elsewhere. In particular, study groups were +happier meeting in homes, for greater intimacy, and because it addresses +childcare needs.

+

Facilities generally liked, one or two niggles.

+

Parking and, at least for the time being, access on foot a bit of a +problem, but public transport good.

+

Availability was characterised as 'good'. Some asked about the +possibility of there being particular designated Quaker slots in the diary.

+

Big meetings (e.g. Scotland GM) needed the whole building.

+

Our ability to host young people's events was discussed in some detail

+

The value of being a central venue was remarked on a number of times.

+

Car parking will of course always be an issue for a central venue, but +the impact of that on those with physical disabilities has to be managed.

+
+
+

6. Planning for open meetings

+

[Note that the date of the 1st meeting was changed following consultation +to Sunday 26 April.]

+

We agreed to have the meeting in the hall, and to start as early as we +think feasable.

+

Aim for 2:30 finish

+

HST suggested opening with an introduction

+

BM suggested that we had to include the basic outline of the financial +difficulty that provoked the establishment of our group.

+

LN wanted to be a bit less explicit, focussing on the broad picture, 20 +years on, 10 years with balanced books, 10 years during which a gap has opened up

+

MH: The questionnaires and a lot of our fact-finding to date have been +about the nature of our current (and immediately past) situation: now we need +to look to the future.

+

Focus on "What is your vision for the Quaker presence and witness in +Central Edinburgh for the next 20 years." Offer an +opportunity to stay behind afterwards for more focussed questions to the group.

+

Is it appropriate to make notes during a worship sharing session? Yes, +if it's made clear at the beginning, and explained as based on the special +nature of the meeting itself.

+
+

6.1. Meeting on 26 April

+ +
+
+

6.2. Meeting of 4 May [subject to revision]

+ + + +
+
+
+

7. Actions review and new actions

+

ES to get some costs of out-of-town units

+

HST to get publicity out about the vision input meetings. [done]

+
+
+

8. Next Meetings

+

Our next meeting will be at 7 Victoria Terrace at 5:30pm on Friday 1 May +[RR apologies]. We +tentatively agreed on Friday 15 May 5:30pm and Friday 29 May 5:30pm [apologies MH] for our next meeting after that.

+
+ + \ No newline at end of file