Mercurial > hg > rsof
view 7vt/feedback.xml @ 22:322dac67ef60
*** empty log message ***
author | ht |
---|---|
date | Fri, 01 May 2009 17:25:31 -0400 |
parents | 1b15544b6b40 |
children | 2168da508adb |
line wrap: on
line source
<?xml version='1.0'?> <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../../../lib/xml/doc.xsl" ?> <!DOCTYPE doc SYSTEM "../../../lib/xml/doc.dtd" > <doc> <head> <title>Transcription of comments on 7VT Futures questionnaires</title> <author>Henry S. Thompson</author> <date>26 Apr 2009</date> </head> <body> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="3">Improviing with the reopening of the terrace.</item> <item term="4">An alternative access [to the creche?] avoiding the kitchen would help. Improve toilets.</item> <item term="12">An alternative access to the rooms/space beyond the kitchen would be good. This would improve kitchen safety and make the additional space more usable for group use. Perhaps improvements to the toilets are needed.</item> <item term="13"> <list type="ndivs"> <item>Improvements do have cost implications. Could we ask Festival Committee to identify Meeting House improvements as one of the fund raising projects (as we did for Kelso Meeting House & the Foyer upgrade) over say 3 years.</item> <item>The Meeting House is a great space, with flexibility having some larger and smaller areas. The availability for outreach here is so important. A window in the city and affordable lettings for groups that might find alternatives difficult.</item> <item>Thank you to the Friends who are reviewing these responses. Your time and consideration is really valuable and appreciated.</item> </list> </item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anne Davies, Sarah J. Davies</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="2">[ticked 'Not important'] I.e. Haymarket area reasonable. Suburbs accessible (from train/bus station)</item> <item term="12"><list type="enum"> <item>Better access to building—almost impossible (steep hill/steps).</item> <item>Improve bottle neck entrance to Foyer.</item> <item>Improve access to loos—stairs v. tricky for elderly.</item> <item>Cheerful, purpose built areas for children & young people—i.e. for latter, spreading sofas & [??] [??] 'dens' (?).</item> <item>Parking facilities for cars bringing elderly to Meeting—imposs.</item> <item>Bike shelter.</item> </list></item> <item term="13"><list type="enum"> <item>Let's start with this premise that we want the Meeting House to be a place for: Meeting for Worship; A quiet centre; A refuge for all looking to worship.</item> <item>Do we want to be tied, for the foreseeable future, to income generation?</item> <item>Is the building [therefore] too expensive to maintain? Is this the bottom line?</item> </list></item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"></item> <item term="13"></item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"></item> <item term="13"></item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"></item> <item term="13"></item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"></item> <item term="13"></item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"></item> <item term="13"></item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"></item> <item term="13"></item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"></item> <item term="13"></item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"></item> <item term="13"></item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"></item> <item term="13"></item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"></item> <item term="13"></item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"></item> <item term="13"></item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"></item> <item term="13"></item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Tony Peach</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12">Improvement of toilet facilities if faunds allow.</item> <item term="13"> <list type="ndivs"> <item>The Meeting House, as you see from my ansers above, ticks all the boxes for me. I see no reason to move and many to stay. I think it extremely unlikely we could find a better centre and would be best concentrating on realising how lucky we are to have it.</item> <item>If finance is thought to be the main problem, maybe more efforts could be concentrated on <list type="enum"> <item>helping the Managers to maximise rentals;</item> <item>considering more fund-raising for future major financial outlay.</item> </list> </item> </list> </item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12">Can't think of any.</item> <item term="13">Seems perfect in every way.</item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Annie Miller</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="3">Difficult at the moment, because the terrace is closed</item> <item term="12"><list type="ndivs"> <item>Upgrade toilets</item> <item>More time available for Quaker committees & other Quaker groups</item> </list></item> <item term="13">I would like us to consider 7VT as a contact point for all Quakers & attenders in Scotland, with an office for GM, maybe?</item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Penny (?) Holland</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12">[Keep?] given slots for Quaker events e.g. funerals/weddings one Saturday afternoon per month free in Meeting Room for such opportunity—even if it means losing income.</item> <item term="13">Certainly think Victoria Terrace is <emph>the best option</emph> in spite of need for forward (?) 'upgrading' etc.</item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Rachel Frith</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="3">Access will be excellent soon I hope when building at end of terrace is finished</item> <item term="12">Toilets</item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Gill Reid</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12">I think the building is managed well and feedback from people I know who use it and are not Quakers is good.</item> <item term="13">No home for any organisation is going to be perfect bu this suits our needs.</item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Alastair Reid</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"> <list type="ndivs"> <item>Some way that Friends could find out about the groups that use it.</item> <item>More devolution of decision-making to assistant managers if possible.</item> <item>Noticeboards—much improved lately—However culd there be a small notice somewhere that sawys what is where.</item> <item>DO we have a leaflet etc. on hiring?</item> <item>Is there smoe way small rooms could be more easily booked (often seems to be full)</item> </list> </item> <item term="13"> <list type="ndivs"> <item>Readers guides to topics of books/pamphlets in library e.g. silence, intro to Quaker writings, beginners, Peace testimony, environmental testimony, Meeting for Worship, prayer etc. etc.</item> <item>I hope that we do not move/sell in the near future—we need an affordable central base—movement elsewhere could be expensive and not necessarily of benefit to Qs & the wider community.</item> </list> </item> </list> </div> <div> <title>Anon</title> <list type="defn"> <item term="12"> <list type="enum"> <item>Toilet facilities need upgrading;</item> <item>Children need a space that <emph>does not</emph> require access through the Kitchen—this is dangerous and makes a mockery of Health/Safety Regs;</item> <item>Priority must be given to Quaker Groups.</item> </list> </item> <item term="13"> <list type="enum"> <item>Radical changes need to be made with regard to Library/Kitchen/Children—It is impossible to cater for groups when access to the Kitchen is unavailable when the Library is in use. It is inefficient and unsage for staff/users—particularly children.</item> <item>The running costs of the building are astronomical. Although I am in favour of remaining in the building, it might be preferable to find more 'affordable' premises.</item> <item>The costs of staffing/managing the building are high because the building is inefficient to run. How do we find a way of upgrading the building with increasing running costs without it simply becominga costly venue for external groups?</item> <item>Too much energy is being expended on hiring out the building.</item> <item>A Quaker Meeting House should be for use by Quakers and community groups.</item> </list> </item> </list> </div> </body> </doc>