diff 7vt/fmh_2009-01-26.xml @ 6:fb79d1c9aad3

*** empty log message ***
author ht
date Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:18:11 -0500
parents
children 890f65827d7f
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/7vt/fmh_2009-01-26.xml	Tue Jan 27 17:18:11 2009 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+<?xml version='1.0'?>
+<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='../../../lib/xml/doc.xsl'?>
+<!DOCTYPE doc SYSTEM "../../../lib/xml/doc.dtd" [
+<!ENTITY pound '&#163;'>
+]>
+<doc>
+ <head>
+  <title>Future of 7 VT working group: Third meeting</title>
+  <author>This informal summary by Henry S. Thompson, Convenor</author>
+  <date>Held at 7 Victoria Terrace, Edinburgh on 26 January 2009, 7:30 p.m.</date>
+ </head>
+ <body>
+  <div>
+   <title>Attendance</title>
+   <p>Present: Alison Burnley, Madeleine Harding, Phil Lucas, Brian Mayes,
+Laurie Naumann, John Phillips,
+Eileen Schott, Henry Thompson (in the clerk's chair)</p>
+   <p>Prevented: Rufus Reade</p>
+  </div>
+  <div>
+   <title>Cashflow history and forecast</title>
+   <p>John Phillips presented some summary cashflow figures over the last nine
+years (attached).</p>
+   <p>Much of BYM deals with property at Local Meeting level -- we are
+relatively unusual in viewing property as an Area Meeting resource.  John
+thinks this is important.</p>
+<p>The staff are not here to run a business, but to be the face of Quakerism in
+Edinburgh.  The contrast with the situation when we were in Stafford Street is
+instructive in this regard.</p>
+   <p>The figures in the sheet are summary numbers, simplified in various ways,
+leaving out a number of much smaller numbers.</p>
+   <p>Over the first 10 years, expenditures (under the heads listed here)
+roughly balanced income.</p>
+   <p>Expenditures are at the top, as insofar as there is a feeling that the
+building is too expensive, these are the things which must be controlled.</p>
+   <p>There has been a notable increase in the staff costs, this is down to a
+number of things:</p>
+   <list>
+    <item>Much more responsibility for the financial side of things</item>
+    <item>Policy development, for example wrt Health and Safety</item>
+    <item>The staff coverage is much greater: two or three staff on duty from
+0900 until 2200 every weekday.</item>
+   </list>
+   <p>The first two of these represent a professionalisation of tasks which formerly fell to
+members, as amateurs.</p>
+   <p>Other costs which have risen signicantly is the maintenance and repairs
+-- recarpetting the Meeting Room, for instance, was 7,000GBP.  This heading
+covers a wide range of things (fridges as well as chairs), and just varies a lot.</p>
+   <p>We cover the Council Tax on the staff flats, as they are required to live
+in them.</p>
+   <p>Lettings income in general has risen, but there has been a 10% gap in 2008.</p>
+   <p>It has been since approx. 2003 that a real gap has opened up between
+expenditure and income.  Area Meeting has viewed it as their responsibility,
+since this is an Area Meeting resource, to cover that gap from contributions
+made by Friends to Quaker funds.</p>
+   <p>Our annual donation income to the Area Meeting is running at around
+70,000GBP.  This depends in important part on a small number of very large
+donations, which John would like to put into savings, but has been unable to do
+so must.  So 20,000 to 30,000 from this goes to bridging the gap.  This in turn
+has reduced the amount we have in the past, and that John feels we should, pass
+on to BYM.</p>
+   <p>What could we do about the situation?  Appeals and legacies have been
+used to cover the increased gaps caused by major items, i.e. the foyer/ramp/Bow
+Room and the stonework.</p>
+   <p>John is not sure we can expect to do this in the future:  too many
+appeals are counter-productive</p>
+   <p>John's take on upcoming large expenses, if we are to go on using the
+building as we are now: window repair/replacement;
+toilets; kitchen and its equipment</p>
+   <p>We are not using the building to its full capacity, but no clear route to
+being sure to do so.</p>
+   <p>If we thought we couldn't afford the major expenses, and/or the income
+continued to drop:</p>
+   <list>
+    <item>Retrench: reduce the staffing, and the approach to use, particularly
+during the day, i.e. open only in the evening.</item>
+    <item>Sell: But the market value of the building is low, moving is unlikely
+to be easy financially.  The flats are a better proposition, they were
+initially viewed at least in part as an investment, and they have done
+reasonably well.</item>
+   </list>
+   <p>Eileen asks, what about the future for maintenance and repairs?  John
+says, well, hard -- sometimes things just jump out and surprise us -- for
+instance, DDA regulation requiring a ramp causing the foyer refit.  30K is a
+fair estimate, not including exceptional items.</p>
+   <p>Laurie asked about a sinking fund?  John said there is one -- we tried to
+put aside a reserve each year in the early days of owning the building, and
+that built up a large general fund, but latterly it has been run down from a
+peak of perhaps 70,000 pounds to a current level of 30,000 pounds.  This is
+distinct from the capital fund, which grows from legacy, was used up to buy
+Kelso meetinghouse, but since most have gone to cover capital costs (foyer,
+stonework) so there is only about 15,000 in that fund today.</p>
+   <p>AM's other major outgoings: donations to BYM, GM, NFPB: 30,000, but AM
+would like that to be higher, it has not kept pace with inflation, and we're
+not getting close to giving half our income to BYM, which was of old the
+target; AM activities: conferences, Woodbrooke, etc: 8,000; Administration:
+newsletters, advertising, fees: 12,000; local meetings pay their own letting
+costs.  It's the donations figure that has to bear the brunt of making the
+books balance.  This makes John unhappy, and probably a lot of AM Friends as well.</p>
+   <p>Henry was worried that there was a clearcut possible plan to
+significantly reduce the gap by cutting back in some way which leaves us here, <emph>or</emph> moves us
+out.</p>
+   <p>John agreed, and said he didn't see how we could meet the needs of the
+Meeting (both AM and CE LM) without staying here, and making the best of what
+we've got.</p>
+   <p>Madeleine asked how many people give regularly.  John said that every
+month there are 80 or 90 monthly standing orders, and 40 or so annual
+donations.  So quite a large proportion of our 240 or so members contribute. 
+Madeleine wondered about other ways to generate more income, similar to other charities.</p>
+   <p>John mentioned that people say "It's so nice not to be in a place where
+people keep asking us for money".  We don't, in general, spend our time trying
+to raise money.</p>
+   <p>John confirmed to Laurie that our donation income includes the Gift Aid benefit.</p>
+   <p>John answered Phil that the rents were reviewed and a phased-in raise
+happened over the last year.  Alison wondered if this had contributed to the
+decline in rental income.</p>
+   <p>John surveyed the staff allocation: The Buxtons and Tom Nisbet make up
+1.7 FTEs; the part-time wardens are paid hourly, one of whom, Cathy McCurrough (sp?),
+is on a .4 FTE contract, and the rest probably add up to around another 1 FTE. 
+So a total of about 3, which is as noted a considerable increase.</p>
+   <p>Laurie asked about Festival income: 'excludes charity grants'?  Festival
+Committee manages a turnover of about 30,000.  They recommend that some of the
+profit each year be allocated to one or more charities, that is what is meant.</p>
+  </div>
+  <div>
+   <title>Progressing the survey</title>
+   <p>Carry forward by email, Henry will coordinate</p>
+  </div>
+  <div>
+   <title>Status of survey preparation</title>
+   <list type="1defn">
+    <item term="Quaker groups (Madeleine)"></item>
+    <item term="Non-Quaker groups (Eileen)"></item>
+    <item term="Central Edinburgh members (Phil)"></item>
+    <item term="Other LMs (Alison)"></item>
+    <item term="AM finance types (Laurie)"></item>
+    <item term="7VT staff (Brian)"></item>
+   </list>
+  </div>
+  <div>
+   <title>Next Meeting</title>
+   <p>Our next meeting will be at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday 17th February at 11
+Douglas Crescent.</p>
+  </div>
+ </body>
+</doc>