Mercurial > hg > rsof
diff Sufferings/2017-02-04/notes.txt @ 114:1e1ec50d13fc
wrapped up
author | ht |
---|---|
date | Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:19:54 -0500 |
parents | |
children |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/Sufferings/2017-02-04/notes.txt Mon Feb 20 16:19:54 2017 -0500 @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +*BYM Sustainability Group* + +(Set up by BYM at 2011 YM, now attached to MfS) + +Annual report after 3 years, "review[ing] progress in 2016 and +priorities for 2017" + +Considerable action centrally, particularly wrt Friends House itself, +and by providing help to local meetings through a new "project officer +providing advice to local meetings on property matters, including +sustainability". + +Much harder to assess what's happening across AMs/LMs, as useful +information gathering and analysis takes resourcing we don't have. + +Important recent focus on "What's _Quaker_ about this concern? Where +does it get its spiritual grounding?" Less guilt, more love! +[ref. SCIAF wrt negative images] + +We are asked to feed back to the group on what we think about the +proposed "a project _Nurturing our Sustainability Ministry_, enabling +and encouraging Friends to give expression to our sustainability +commitment in many different forms". [Don Stubbings, ??? to contact +Lis Burch, Clerk BYM Sust. Grp.] + +Do we, as other AMs apparently do, report our annual energy usage (at +least for 7VT and Kelso) to BYM along with our annual accounts? + +An interesting echo of some of the STIR group's observations: The +Canterbury Commitment was a commitment made by BYM, but has been +adopted and acted on by AMs to widely varying degrees. What does it +mean for a more central body to make a notionally binding commitment +when the action involved has to be taken 'lower down'? + +As the group was established in 2014 for an initial period of three +years, there will now be a review group established to consider +whether "this approach is the right way for our concern to be carried +forward". + +------- +*Opposition to Fracking* + +(From a meeting of Pendle Hill AM) + + We ask Britain Yearly Meeting to maximise involvement in ecumenical + and interfaith structures that allow faith groups to have a strong + united environmentalist voice on fracking, and that as Quakers + nationally we take a public stance against fracking. + +MfS supported this, and the minute makes a specific statement on +behalf of Quakers in Britain in support of sustainable energy and in +opposition to "unconventional approaches" to fossil fuel extraction, +including fracking (expanded from the original to imply worldwide, in +response to a mention about the role of Grangemouth in processing US +shale gas). + +There will be some kind of event on Pendle Hill on 6 May... + +--------- + +*Cadet Forces in Scottish State Schools* + +QPSWCC has taken up this matter, and broadened it in the area of +transparency and accountability + +-------- + +JYM Deadline 15 March + +-------- + +*MfS Annual Report* + +[Home groups: Scotland and Wales, only 8 people, half alternates] + +Jocelyn's critique: It may seem that nothing is happening here, but +the delivery of information in person has long-term ramifications +which are hard to foresee. + +"A conduit backwards and forwards" + +Vision and prophecy -- where does that happen? + +-------- + +*Quaker Housing Trust* + +Outstanding work, enormous almost-all volunteer effort: give them more +money! + +-------- + +*Yearly Meeting Gathering* + +Anchoring: making time and space to digest, both food and +mental/spiritual/emotional inputs, and no (centrally organised) +meetings over lunch + +Two afternoons with 'all-age activities' (lots of facilities for sport +at the venue) + +Overall theme is 'Movement Building: Working with others to make a +difference' + +---------- + +*Statement as "Response to the current international situation"* + +A good one, hope you've seen it.