comparison 7vt/fmh_2009-03-08.xml @ 12:ee233da81436

raw
author ht
date Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:04:18 -0400
parents
children 885e1a747bca
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
11:3c41ed6a48aa 12:ee233da81436
1 <?xml version='1.0'?>
2 <?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='../../../lib/xml/doc.xsl'?>
3 <!DOCTYPE doc SYSTEM "../../../lib/xml/doc.dtd" [
4 <!ENTITY pound '&#163;'>
5 ]>
6 <doc>
7 <head>
8 <title>Future of 7 VT working group: Sixth meeting</title>
9 <author>This informal summary by Henry S. Thompson, Convenor</author>
10 <date>Held at 7 Victoria Terrace, Edinburgh on 8 March 2009, 7:30 p.m.</date>
11 </head>
12 <body>
13 <div>
14 <title>Attendance</title>
15 <p>Present: Alison Burnley, Madeleine Harding, Phil Lucas,
16 Brian Mayes, Laurie Naumann,
17 Eileen Schott, Henry Thompson (in the clerk's chair)</p>
18 </div>
19 <div>
20 <title>External lettings survey forms, and anecdote</title>
21 <p>Anthony Buxton shared a number of completed survey forms filled in by
22 external letting clients. ES reviewed these. There were 28 forms, 24 from
23 2008: we don't know what proportion of the total clients this represents. Most
24 of the tick-box ratings are good or excellent. There are positive comments
25 about individual staff being helpful, the negative comments are about rooms
26 being too small, or cold, or the state of the toilets. The one thing that
27 looks like it could be improved is "the accuracy of information received".</p>
28 <p>HST talked with Anthony about an example which he had heard of from a
29 friend, in which a group had stopped a long-standing regular let because they
30 could no longer bring their sandwiches.</p>
31 </div>
32 <div>
33 <title>Review of envisaging futures</title>
34 <p>Brainstorming</p>
35 <list>
36 <item>Day-time letting only?</item>
37 <item>Quaker Centre?</item>
38 <item>Full-service Rain Forest Cafe? Year-round?
39 <list>
40 <item>Rain Forest Cafe and/or Festival to pay for the kitchen refit, over time?</item>
41 </list>
42 </item>
43 <item>Quaker presence?</item>
44 <item>Eliminate regular bookings in favour of blocks?</item>
45 <item>A Quaker-only centre?</item>
46 <item>Move out
47 <list>
48 <item>And buy a building to be just a meeting house</item>
49 <item>And use rented accommodation</item>
50 <item>And meet as house groups</item>
51 <item>And share a building, either new or rented&mdash;Nicholson Square
52 Methodist Church; Southside Community Centre; new Prestonfield Community Centre</item>
53 </list>
54 </item>
55 <item>Primarily seen as a physical resource for the AM, with other activities complementing that</item>
56 <item>Simplify things? Reduce the kitchen to hot-drinks only?</item>
57 <item>Being open to young Quaker groups?</item>
58 <item>Doing (whatever we do) in <emph>our own space</emph></item>
59 <item>Being a base for outreach?</item>
60 <item>Provide courses for Quakers (and non-Quakers) -- Quaker Quest all year round</item>
61 <item>Move kitchen to ground-floor, replacing office/Bow room, and make the
62 foyer a real cafe [new from Anthony Buxton via HST after the meeting]</item>
63 </list>
64 </div>
65 <div>
66 <title>Food hygiene regulations</title>
67 <p>We discussed the complexities of the interaction between details of use
68 and details of regulations. We were uncomfortable with the extent to which the
69 letter of the law has been applied, and wondered whether in practice we should
70 be willing to formulate a level of not-quite-strictly enforcing some things.
71 AM trustees are looking into this, but perhaps not with the urgency we need.</p>
72 <p>The problem with people bringing in their own food is, we are told, the
73 risk of cross-contamination, but most groups are now happy with having food
74 catered in when an all-day event involves a meal.</p>
75 </div>
76 <div>
77 <title>Towards a timetable</title>
78 <p>HST attempted a brief exercise in working backwards from our notional
79 deadline of 6 June for a report to AM.</p>
80 <p>We asked ourselves, based on others' expectations, whether we will report
81 on a series of options, their costs and benefits, or whether we will make "a recommendation".</p>
82 <div>
83 <title>Draft table of contents</title>
84 <list type="enum">
85 <item>Background/history/introduction</item>
86 <item>Financial background/situation</item>
87 <item>Description of the building</item>
88 <item>Current use of building (some history)</item>
89 <item>Regulatory impact</item>
90 <item>
91 Alternative futures
92 <list>
93 <item>In 7 Victoria Terrace
94 <list>
95 <item>Less</item>
96 <item>The Same</item>
97 <item>More</item>
98 </list>
99 </item>
100 <item>Elsewhere
101 <list>
102 <item>Own</item>
103 <item>Not</item>
104 </list>
105 </item>
106 </list>
107 </item>
108 </list>
109 </div>
110 </div>
111 <div>
112 <title>Next steps</title>
113 </div>
114 <div>
115 <title>Actions review and new actions</title>
116 <p>HST to get the Kath Russell report [<name>pending</name>], and some letting evaluation
117 forms, say from 4Q2008, and circulate [<name>done</name>]. Also ask if any
118 summary or collation has been done [<name>done</name>, answer is 'no'].</p>
119 <p>HST to ask John Phillips for an electronic version of his notes for us</p>
120 <p>HST to ask Ken Jobling where to find the details of how food hygiene regulations
121 apply depending on exactly what's happening. [<name>pending</name>]</p>
122 <p>HST to invite Mark Hutcheson to one of our meetings at his earliest
123 convenience, as Convenor of AM Trustees.</p>
124 </div>
125 <div>
126 <title>Next Meeting</title>
127 <p>Our next meeting will be at 7 Victoria Terrace at 5:15pm on Sunday 22 March. We
128 tentatively agreed on Friday 3 April 5:30pm for our next meeting after that.</p>
129 </div>
130 </body>
131 </doc>