Mercurial > hg > rsof
comparison MHMC/3_month_Managers.txt @ 621:e02ed600230c
merge
| author | Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| date | Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:47:02 +0100 |
| parents | b87a2a8bad8a |
| children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 620:a9577984cdfc | 621:e02ed600230c |
|---|---|
| 1 Flat is OK, one small pblm with humidity | |
| 2 | |
| 3 What's good: | |
| 4 | |
| 5 SS: enjoyable, transition has gone well, caveats below, a good fit, | |
| 6 working well with a good team, Quakers friendly and welcoming, | |
| 7 moral and ethics a plus | |
| 8 AK: Having a positive impact, started well, more to come, next week | |
| 9 new structure starts | |
| 10 | |
| 11 Observations: Needs attention: Ken's contract(s) | |
| 12 Taking longer to get stuck in to the core aspects of the job: | |
| 13 1) Mopping up after the Fringe; | |
| 14 2) Staff restructures; | |
| 15 3) Planning for next summer; | |
| 16 4) End of year financial audit. | |
| 17 Sometimes a bit frustrated by the hangover of the Fringe, which in | |
| 18 principle should have been handled before we came on board. | |
| 19 | |
| 20 A bit tricky, complex internal stuff, arising from the history of the | |
| 21 challenge of Majk's situation. | |
| 22 | |
| 23 ACTION: HST to start having regular 1630 Friday meetings with | |
| 24 Managers, biweekly to start, cancel if not required. Start on 28 Feb. | |
| 25 | |
| 26 [Hartley has written off the £500 deposit, paid the IMS bill, and | |
| 27 agreed difference between shower and window. Still waiting on lift | |
| 28 voice.] | |
| 29 | |
| 30 Less good: | |
| 31 | |
| 32 1) Boundaries between Managers and HST, example: timing of HST's | |
| 33 announcement of MS and EG's job changes. HST should have shown | |
| 34 the report to the Managers before it went in/public. | |
| 35 | |
| 36 2) HST screwed up wrt SS's role in Hartley's visit in the subsequent | |
| 37 MHMC meeting, acknowledged and apologised for. | |
| 38 | |
| 39 3) More communication, see regular meeting above. | |
| 40 | |
| 41 4) When should Managers email HST vs. MHMC? When to revert has been | |
| 42 handled well, let's try Managers going ahead and reverting | |
| 43 directly to MHMC when they think that's appropriate. | |
| 44 | |
| 45 HST to reconsider SESAM vs MHMCC | |
| 46 | |
| 47 5) Short notice of MHMC meetings, maybe only one will attend | |
| 48 | |
| 49 6) Quaker stuff has its own rules, has an interplay with Majk, came | |
| 50 to the ceilidh as members of the community, we asked Majk for | |
| 51 some guidance as to what to expect. [Redacted, but upshot was | |
| 52 the suggestion that this (and other similar questions) | |
| 53 was grounds for persisting the 'acting up' salary uplift through | |
| 54 February, see MHMC minutes from 2025-04-01]. | |
| 55 | |
| 56 7) Not clear about what the Staff Support Person's role is. | |
| 57 | |
| 58 |
