comparison MHMC/3_month_Managers.txt @ 621:e02ed600230c

merge
author Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
date Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:47:02 +0100
parents b87a2a8bad8a
children
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
620:a9577984cdfc 621:e02ed600230c
1 Flat is OK, one small pblm with humidity
2
3 What's good:
4
5 SS: enjoyable, transition has gone well, caveats below, a good fit,
6 working well with a good team, Quakers friendly and welcoming,
7 moral and ethics a plus
8 AK: Having a positive impact, started well, more to come, next week
9 new structure starts
10
11 Observations: Needs attention: Ken's contract(s)
12 Taking longer to get stuck in to the core aspects of the job:
13 1) Mopping up after the Fringe;
14 2) Staff restructures;
15 3) Planning for next summer;
16 4) End of year financial audit.
17 Sometimes a bit frustrated by the hangover of the Fringe, which in
18 principle should have been handled before we came on board.
19
20 A bit tricky, complex internal stuff, arising from the history of the
21 challenge of Majk's situation.
22
23 ACTION: HST to start having regular 1630 Friday meetings with
24 Managers, biweekly to start, cancel if not required. Start on 28 Feb.
25
26 [Hartley has written off the £500 deposit, paid the IMS bill, and
27 agreed difference between shower and window. Still waiting on lift
28 voice.]
29
30 Less good:
31
32 1) Boundaries between Managers and HST, example: timing of HST's
33 announcement of MS and EG's job changes. HST should have shown
34 the report to the Managers before it went in/public.
35
36 2) HST screwed up wrt SS's role in Hartley's visit in the subsequent
37 MHMC meeting, acknowledged and apologised for.
38
39 3) More communication, see regular meeting above.
40
41 4) When should Managers email HST vs. MHMC? When to revert has been
42 handled well, let's try Managers going ahead and reverting
43 directly to MHMC when they think that's appropriate.
44
45 HST to reconsider SESAM vs MHMCC
46
47 5) Short notice of MHMC meetings, maybe only one will attend
48
49 6) Quaker stuff has its own rules, has an interplay with Majk, came
50 to the ceilidh as members of the community, we asked Majk for
51 some guidance as to what to expect. [Redacted, but upshot was
52 the suggestion that this (and other similar questions)
53 was grounds for persisting the 'acting up' salary uplift through
54 February, see MHMC minutes from 2025-04-01].
55
56 7) Not clear about what the Staff Support Person's role is.
57
58