Mercurial > hg > rsof
comparison but_a_way.html @ 140:db8470ebe5a0
for merge???
| author | Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| date | Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:23:50 +0000 |
| parents | 8165eac02745 |
| children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 139:39e5269bc7ed | 140:db8470ebe5a0 |
|---|---|
| 72 img {border: 0} | 72 img {border: 0} |
| 73 .copyright {font-size: 70%} | 73 .copyright {font-size: 70%} |
| 74 .note {width: 20%; float: right; clear: right; margin-left: .5em} | 74 .note {width: 20%; float: right; clear: right; margin-left: .5em} |
| 75 .bib p {clear: right; float: right; width: 75%; margin-top: 0pt} | 75 .bib p {clear: right; float: right; width: 75%; margin-top: 0pt} |
| 76 .bib name {display: inline-block} | 76 .bib name {display: inline-block} |
| 77 .bib div {clear: both}</style><title>Not a notion but a way</title></head><body style="font-family: DejaVu Sans, Arial; background: rgb(254,250,246)"><div style="text-align: center" class="head"><h1>Not a notion but a way</h1><hr/><div class="byline">Henry S. Thompson</div><div class="byline">9 January 2017</div><div class="copyright">Copyright © 2018 <a href="http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/">Henry S. Thompson</a> <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en">CC-BY-SA</a></div></div><div class="body"><div><h2>1. Introduction</h2><p><i>God, words and us</i> <a href="#hr">[Rowlands 2017]</a> is a good thing to have done, | 77 .bib div {clear: both}</style><title>Not a notion but a way</title></head><body style="font-family: DejaVu Sans, Arial; background: rgb(254,250,246)"><div style="text-align: center" class="head"><h1>Not a notion but a way</h1><hr/><div class="byline">Henry S. Thompson</div><div class="byline">9 January 2018</div><div class="copyright">Copyright © 2018 <a href="http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/">Henry S. Thompson</a> <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en">CC-BY-SA</a></div></div><div class="body"><div><h2>1. Introduction</h2><p><i>God, words and us</i> <a href="#hr">[Rowlands 2017]</a> is a good thing to have done, |
| 78 thoughtful, worth reading but, for me, ultimately disappointing, an opportunity | 78 thoughtful, worth reading but, for me, ultimately disappointing, an opportunity |
| 79 missed. Maybe focussing on the language that divides us was necessary, and the | 79 missed. Maybe focussing on the language that divides us was necessary, and the |
| 80 light this book shines on the nature of that division, what is and isn't | 80 light this book shines on the nature of that division, what is and isn't |
| 81 important about it, is valuable. But it feels to me that it got trapped by its | 81 important about it, is valuable. But it feels to me that it got trapped by its |
| 82 own success and never got past a fundamental assumption which guaranteed its | 82 own success and never got past a fundamental assumption which guaranteed its |