Mercurial > hg > rsof
comparison MHMC/access.xml @ 230:c118ca8229c9
from rsof_local
author | Henry S Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 26 Mar 2023 19:23:06 +0100 |
parents | |
children | e042c921c275 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
229:1d1d90cb18b2 | 230:c118ca8229c9 |
---|---|
1 <?xml version='1.0'?> | |
2 <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../../../home/ht/lib/xml/doc.xsl" ?> | |
3 <!DOCTYPE doc SYSTEM "../../../home/ht/lib/xml/doc.dtd" > | |
4 <doc> | |
5 <head> | |
6 <title>Access technology</title> | |
7 <author>Henry S. Thompson</author> | |
8 <date>26 Mar 2023</date> | |
9 </head> | |
10 <body> | |
11 <div> | |
12 <title>Introduction</title> | |
13 <p>I've had a quick look at the technology available to provide more | |
14 flexible access control into and within 7VT.</p> | |
15 <p>Per our previous discussion, it's worth distinguishing at least four | |
16 types of access we might consider:</p> | |
17 <list type="defn"> | |
18 <item term="Front door">Motorised. Currently push-panel activated in both directions. | |
19 Entryphone provides audio but not video to remote panels on 1st and 2nd floors, | |
20 which can (unlock/open?).</item> | |
21 <item term="Upper Bow stair door"></item> | |
22 <item term="Internal doors"></item> | |
23 <item term="Elevator"></item> | |
24 </list> | |
25 <p>(I've assumed we won't change the exit-only emergency nature of the | |
26 double-doors at the bottom of the main staircase.)</p> | |
27 <p>Most of the companies whose websites I've looked at are aimed at either | |
28 homeowners or businesses. Some of the business-orientated ones at least | |
29 mention small businesses, which is probably the closest we're going to get for | |
30 our needs.</p> | |
31 <p>Below are summaries of the offerings from a few of the companies I've | |
32 looked at. We would not deal directly with any of them, but would need to | |
33 contract with a local specialist firm for installation. I presume we've got | |
34 someone on the books for maintainance of the current entryphone/door-opener | |
35 etc., but we may need a different outfit for a new system.</p> | |
36 </div> | |
37 <div> | |
38 <title><link href="https://www.paxton-access.com/">Paxton</link></title> | |
39 <p>Recommended by the team at Augustine United: "the Paxton Net2 system [is] | |
40 very popular and something of a market leader".</p> | |
41 <p>Two relevant devices: A standard entry-panel and a door-latch.</p> | |
42 <p>Both are activated by a proximity card or fob, and both can be installed | |
43 for standalone use, with a master card used to | |
44 enable access cards, or as part of a network-controlled system for much more sophisticated usage patterns.</p> | |
45 <display>Staff and visitors are issued with electronic tokens instead of | |
46 keys. User tokens can be added to the system in seconds by presenting an enrolment card to the door/entry-panel. | |
47 | |
48 If someone loses their token, it can be simply barred from the system by presenting a shadow card to a reader.</display> | |
49 <p>The entry-panel version would be the candidate for the front door, | |
50 replacing the existing panel.</p> | |
51 <p>The standalone system has three components: the entry panel, the | |
52 monitor(s) and the controller. I <emph>assume</emph> multiple monitors can be | |
53 used. It's not easy to find prices, but I am pretty confident that the parts | |
54 we need should be available for between £1000–2000. Installation would | |
55 be at least a person-day, I would guess, so could easily be £500 or more.</p> | |
56 <p>Upgrading to the next level, with full (PC and mobile app) software-based control of | |
57 token-holders, remote management, etc. would probably be as much again.</p> | |
58 <p>I <emph>think</emph> that only a further upgrade, and replacement of the | |
59 door panel, would get us to mobile-as-keycard functionality.</p> | |
60 </div> | |
61 </body> | |
62 </doc> |