Mercurial > hg > rsof
comparison Sufferings/2020-02-01/notes.txt @ 190:8143d5a725eb
adding stuff late
author | Henry Thompson <ht@markup.co.uk> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:25:20 +0100 |
parents | |
children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
189:b199b7145c40 | 190:8143d5a725eb |
---|---|
1 *Report from QCEA* | |
2 | |
3 *Joint statement wrt Brexit from B & I YMs* | |
4 | |
5 *Trustees consultation* | |
6 | |
7 Acknowledged concerns about decisions wrt meeting-centred support | |
8 | |
9 "Very clear steer" from MfS was "that Vibrancy had been a good thing" | |
10 | |
11 But we didn't _ever_ hear about or endorse the new plan | |
12 | |
13 Simple charity -- more work coming on that | |
14 What do _we_ need from the centre to help us be simpler | |
15 | |
16 LDW and Hubs: 38 responses | |
17 Experiment with one hub later this year | |
18 LDW roll-out 'immediately', will take years, still "in reach of" | |
19 every meeting | |
20 | |
21 PP: Gradual process, will continue to be wealth of specialist | |
22 expertise in London | |
23 Discussion w. QLCC on what kinds specialist expertise is needed | |
24 and when it needs to be _in London_. | |
25 | |
26 *Speaking out* | |
27 | |
28 Thoughtful contributions from staff | |
29 | |
30 Drawing out two continua | |
31 * Complelled to witness <--> Compelled to achieve change | |
32 * Be distinctively Quaker <--> Voice all concerns | |
33 | |
34 York 2009 on SSM as example of witness w/o expectation of change | |
35 _achieving_ change | |
36 | |
37 ***Nominations to JYM needed by 10 March*** | |
38 | |
39 *Diversity* | |
40 Sam McNair reported very impressively on a Diversity and Inclusion | |
41 5: Hilda Clark | |
42 Gay X find X->Y trans people challenging to their own choices wrt | |
43 their own dismorphia | |
44 Not all trans people are prepared/able to 'come out' to everyone in a | |
45 new meeting: how would we as a Meeting cope with a gradual spread of | |
46 knowledge? | |
47 Meeting equivalent of a pen-friend -- e.g. 'twinning' with a Meeting | |
48 from Ghana | |
49 Finding a way to make a space that's safe for people who are | |
50 labouring under the experience of being 'other' in some way to share | |
51 that: they may have been waiting a long time for the opportunity... | |
52 | |
53 *YM Gathering* | |
54 https://www.quaker.org.uk/ym | |
55 Theme: Listening, prophecy and reconciliation: Allyship in a climate emergency | |
56 | |
57 This emerged from discussions between YM Agenda Committee and JYM | |
58 Arrangements C'ttee | |
59 | |
60 1) Why should we care about inclusion when we need to focus on the emergency? | |
61 3) Discussing the hard stuff tenderly without blowing up | |
62 2) Remembering the warnings of the 1970s and 1980s as prophecy, what | |
63 are we hearing _now_ that is prophetic | |
64 ------------ | |
65 News about Hubs and LDWs v. welcome, one aspect of this has been | |
66 concerning members of my AM, which is the LDW recruitment process | |
67 | |
68 Vibrancy in Meetings evaluation [has some good things to say about the | |
69 value of the LDW-Centre connection] | |
70 | |
71 - Quaker discipline 2nd-largest "of all presenting needs" | |
72 | |
73 - What is important | |
74 | |
75 "delivered by a skilled worker and based on deep understanding of | |
76 local meetings and the local context" | |
77 | |
78 - Recommendations | |
79 | |
80 "there is considerable need [in Meetings] around the basics of | |
81 Quakerism, meetings and processes" | |
82 ---- | |
83 | |
84 "As Quakers, we all share responsibility for the Meeting. You may | |
85 have questions about Quakerism in general, or our Meeting in | |
86 particular ~ if so, please feel free to share these with someone | |
87 sitting near you. If they can't help you, they can probably point | |
88 out someone to you who probably can. | |
89 | |
90 I accept that the evidence has convinced Trustees that overall we are | |
91 not delivering on that promise, and that paid LDWs are necessary. | |
92 | |
93 Couldn't find in the record whether the 4 VW were | |
94 Members/Attenders/... | |
95 | |
96 And I take it from reviewing various job ads that we do not ever | |
97 'require' applicants to be Members. | |
98 | |
99 But all the evaluation comments, and my takeaway from the video, | |
100 suggest that that would be very desirable. | |
101 | |
102 Is this recognised as a priority? | |
103 | |
104 Will we at least advertise 'internally' before publicly? | |
105 ----------- | |
106 In practice, not a problem: no-one could apply w/o a "deep | |
107 understanding" (not Membership, YFs not joining on principle). | |
108 | |
109 [wrist-slap from Clerk -- too 'narrow'] | |
110 |