comparison Sufferings/2017-12-02/sufferings_agenda_2017-11.txt @ 116:3b0a11c71380

*** empty log message ***
author ht
date Sun, 03 Dec 2017 10:36:40 -0500
parents
children
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
115:2eb8d384887e 116:3b0a11c71380
1 To: Juliet Prager <Julietp@quaker.org.uk>
2 Cc: Paul Parker <RC@quaker.org.uk>
3 Subject: Two agenda points for Sufferings on Saturday
4 From: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
5 User-Agent: Gnus/5.1012 (Gnus v5.10.12) XEmacs/21.5-b34 (linux)
6 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:47:15 +0000
7 Message-ID: <f5b7eu7vke4.fsf@troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk>
8 --text follows this line--
9 [Juliet, could you please forward this to Margaret Bryan and Anne
10 Ullathorne, I can't immediately find email addresses for them. Thanks]
11
12 1) I haven't checked ever possible document, but looking at this year's
13 draft Annual Report for Sufferings, I was reminded of Jocelyn Bell
14 Burnell's challenge to us back in December of last year, to consider
15 whether our approach to reports from central committees was working
16 well. MFS/16/12/20 refers:
17
18 We have heard of the positive relationship which has been developed
19 between QLCC and BYM Trustees and have been challenged to consider how
20 we as Meeting for Sufferings can work more effectively with QLCC.
21
22 We recognise that this is an area that needs more work and ask our
23 Arrangements Group to do some initial thinking on this, liaising with
24 QLCC as appropriate, and to report back to us.
25
26 I note that in the follow-up mailing to that meeting, the minutes of
27 MfSAG for 2016-12-12 acknowledges this
28
29 We noted our minute 2016.12.40 about Quaker Life Central Committee
30 (QLCC) in which MfSAG is asked to do some initial thinking on the ways
31 in which MfS can work more effectively with QLCC and will return to
32 this in due course.
33
34 But I can't find any sign that this has happened, or any mention in the
35 most recent MfSAG minutes that we plan to -- have I missed something?
36
37 2) In the Trustee's Minutes of 21 September (MfS 2017 12 13b, item
38 BYMT-2017-09-08) I see
39
40 We feel that the time may be right to look at the purpose Yearly
41 Meeting in the life of the Society of Friends, including whether
42 different formats may be appropriate in future.
43
44 and a little further on
45
46 We agree that Ingrid Greenhow should prepare a paper and that she
47 should represent us at [YMAC of 28 October].
48
49 Was this with reference to that earlier point?
50
51 In any case, could we hear a bit more about this issue? If feels like
52 something we should be involved with.
53
54 Thanks,
55
56 ht