601
|
1 Flat is OK, one small pblm with humidity
|
|
2
|
|
3 What's good:
|
|
4 SS: enjoyable, transition has gone well, caveats to come, a good fit,
|
|
5 working well with a good team, Quakers friendly and welcoming,
|
|
6 moral and ethics a plus
|
|
7 AK: Having a positive impact, started well, more to come, next week
|
|
8 new structure starts
|
|
9
|
|
10
|
|
11 Bbservations: Needs attention: Ken's contract(s)
|
|
12 Taking longer to get stuck in to the core aspects of the job:
|
|
13 1) Mopping up after the Fringe;
|
|
14 2) Staff restructures;
|
|
15 3) Planning for next summer;
|
|
16 4) End of year financial audit.
|
|
17 Sometimes a bit frustrated by the hangover of the Fringe, which in
|
|
18 principle should have been handled before we came on board.
|
|
19
|
|
20 A bit tricky, complex internal stuff, arising from the history of the
|
|
21 challenge of Majk's situation.
|
|
22
|
|
23 ACTION: HST to start having regular 1630 Friday meetings with
|
|
24 Managers, biweekly to start, cancel if not required. Start on 28 Feb.
|
|
25
|
|
26 [Hartley has written off the £500 deposit, paid the IMS bill, and
|
|
27 agreed difference between shower and window. Still waiting on lift
|
|
28 voice.]
|
|
29
|
|
30 Less good:
|
|
31
|
|
32 1) Boundaries between Managers and HST, example: timing of HST's
|
|
33 announcement of MS and EG's job changes. HST should have shown
|
|
34 the report to the Managers before it went in/public.
|
|
35
|
|
36 2) HST screwed up wrt SS's role in Hartley's visit in the subsequent
|
|
37 MHMC meeting, acknowledged and apologised for.
|
|
38
|
|
39 3) More communication, see reguilar meeting above.
|
|
40
|
|
41 4) When should Managers email HST vs. MHMC? When to revert has been
|
|
42 handled well, let's try Managers going ahead and reverting
|
|
43 directly to MHMC when they think that's appropriate.
|
|
44
|
|
45 HST to reconsider sesam vs mhmcc
|
|
46
|
|
47 5) Short notice of MHMC meetings, maybe only one will attend
|
|
48
|
|
49 6) Quaker stuff has its on rules, has an interplay with Majk, came
|
|
50 to the ceilidh as members of the community, we asked Majk for
|
|
51 some guidance as to what to expect. Beth said so, will you
|
|
52 (Majk) be asking for more uplift.
|
|
53
|
|
54 This raises the Staff Support Person role.
|
|
55
|
|
56
|