116
|
1 To: Juliet Prager <Julietp@quaker.org.uk>
|
|
2 Cc: Paul Parker <RC@quaker.org.uk>
|
|
3 Subject: Two agenda points for Sufferings on Saturday
|
|
4 From: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
|
|
5 User-Agent: Gnus/5.1012 (Gnus v5.10.12) XEmacs/21.5-b34 (linux)
|
|
6 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:47:15 +0000
|
|
7 Message-ID: <f5b7eu7vke4.fsf@troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk>
|
|
8 --text follows this line--
|
|
9 [Juliet, could you please forward this to Margaret Bryan and Anne
|
|
10 Ullathorne, I can't immediately find email addresses for them. Thanks]
|
|
11
|
|
12 1) I haven't checked ever possible document, but looking at this year's
|
|
13 draft Annual Report for Sufferings, I was reminded of Jocelyn Bell
|
|
14 Burnell's challenge to us back in December of last year, to consider
|
|
15 whether our approach to reports from central committees was working
|
|
16 well. MFS/16/12/20 refers:
|
|
17
|
|
18 We have heard of the positive relationship which has been developed
|
|
19 between QLCC and BYM Trustees and have been challenged to consider how
|
|
20 we as Meeting for Sufferings can work more effectively with QLCC.
|
|
21
|
|
22 We recognise that this is an area that needs more work and ask our
|
|
23 Arrangements Group to do some initial thinking on this, liaising with
|
|
24 QLCC as appropriate, and to report back to us.
|
|
25
|
|
26 I note that in the follow-up mailing to that meeting, the minutes of
|
|
27 MfSAG for 2016-12-12 acknowledges this
|
|
28
|
|
29 We noted our minute 2016.12.40 about Quaker Life Central Committee
|
|
30 (QLCC) in which MfSAG is asked to do some initial thinking on the ways
|
|
31 in which MfS can work more effectively with QLCC and will return to
|
|
32 this in due course.
|
|
33
|
|
34 But I can't find any sign that this has happened, or any mention in the
|
|
35 most recent MfSAG minutes that we plan to -- have I missed something?
|
|
36
|
|
37 2) In the Trustee's Minutes of 21 September (MfS 2017 12 13b, item
|
|
38 BYMT-2017-09-08) I see
|
|
39
|
|
40 We feel that the time may be right to look at the purpose Yearly
|
|
41 Meeting in the life of the Society of Friends, including whether
|
|
42 different formats may be appropriate in future.
|
|
43
|
|
44 and a little further on
|
|
45
|
|
46 We agree that Ingrid Greenhow should prepare a paper and that she
|
|
47 should represent us at [YMAC of 28 October].
|
|
48
|
|
49 Was this with reference to that earlier point?
|
|
50
|
|
51 In any case, could we hear a bit more about this issue? If feels like
|
|
52 something we should be involved with.
|
|
53
|
|
54 Thanks,
|
|
55
|
|
56 ht
|