annotate but_a_way.xml @ 117:6ade7add794a

intro
author ht
date Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:03:28 -0500
parents
children bbda1b9895b2
Ignore whitespace changes - Everywhere: Within whitespace: At end of lines:
rev   line source
117
ht
parents:
diff changeset
1 <?xml version='1.0'?>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
2 <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../../lib/xml/doc.xsl" ?>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
3 <!DOCTYPE doc SYSTEM "../../lib/xml/doc.dtd" >
ht
parents:
diff changeset
4 <doc>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
5 <head>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
6 <title>Not a notion but a way</title>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
7 <author>Henry S. Thompson</author>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
8 <date>11 Dec 2017</date>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
9 </head>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
10 <body>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
11 <div>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
12 <title>Introduction</title>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
13 <p><emph>God, words and us</emph>[subtitle] is a good thing to have done,
ht
parents:
diff changeset
14 thoughtful, worth reading but, for me, ultimately disappointing, an opportunity
ht
parents:
diff changeset
15 missed. Maybe focussing on the language that divides us was necessary, and the
ht
parents:
diff changeset
16 light this book shines on the nature of that division, what is and isn't
ht
parents:
diff changeset
17 important about it, is valuable. But it feels to me that it got trapped by its
ht
parents:
diff changeset
18 own success and never got past a fundamental assumption which guaranteed its
ht
parents:
diff changeset
19 eventual limitations: it gives good advice about what kind of language
ht
parents:
diff changeset
20 <emph>not</emph> to use, but is much less useful about what kind of language we
ht
parents:
diff changeset
21 <emph>should</emph> use.</p>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
22 <p>The key, mistaken, assumption is that what we need to talk about as
ht
parents:
diff changeset
23 Quakers is what we <emph>believe</emph> (or don't believe). There are a few
ht
parents:
diff changeset
24 oblique mentions of alternatives in the book, but it's almost all about belief.
ht
parents:
diff changeset
25 That's not the right place to look for what unites us as Quakers. After all,
ht
parents:
diff changeset
26 we've all heard it said, indeed many of us have said ourselves, that the
ht
parents:
diff changeset
27 <emph>single</emph> think we can confidently say unites the membership of
ht
parents:
diff changeset
28 Britain Yearly meeting is that when we can we meet together in something called
ht
parents:
diff changeset
29 Meeting for Worship. Our identity is not fundamentally determined by what we
ht
parents:
diff changeset
30 believe, but by what we <emph>do</emph>.</p>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
31 <p>If you only look at the language of belief, you miss a whole different
ht
parents:
diff changeset
32 way of looking at religious identity. Choices with respect to the language of
ht
parents:
diff changeset
33 belief are what distinguish many, even most, Christian denominations from one
ht
parents:
diff changeset
34 another, but that's actually a game we Quakers 'officially' declined to play a
ht
parents:
diff changeset
35 long time ago: we don't do creeds. And we're not the only religion that
ht
parents:
diff changeset
36 isn't best understood in terms of belief.</p>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
37 <p>I was moved by my disappointment with where the theology think tank has
ht
parents:
diff changeset
38 left us to try to write down what I see as a better way to
ht
parents:
diff changeset
39 distinguish <emph>us</emph>, to try to shift the ground of looking for language
ht
parents:
diff changeset
40 that we can unite with, that works for us, from belief to practice, from
ht
parents:
diff changeset
41 ortho<emph>doxy</emph> to ortho<emph>praxy</emph>.</p>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
42 <p>I don't claim originality in suggesting this: I think it's at the heart
ht
parents:
diff changeset
43 of what Ben Pink Dandelion has been writing and saying for some time, and I'd
ht
parents:
diff changeset
44 be surprised if there weren't others who will read this and say "But that's
ht
parents:
diff changeset
45 what I've been saying for <emph>years</emph>". I can only apologise for not
ht
parents:
diff changeset
46 having read more widely or, increasingly likely, that I have simply forgotten
ht
parents:
diff changeset
47 what I <emph>have</emph> read. My excuse for writing this none-the-less is to
ht
parents:
diff changeset
48 try to encourage people to read <emph>God, words and us</emph>, but avoid the
ht
parents:
diff changeset
49 not unreasonable conclusion from doing so that
ht
parents:
diff changeset
50 belief-talk is what matters.</p>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
51 </div>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
52 <div>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
53 <title>We already know this</title>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
54 <p>Listing a few well-known phrases will help me make my point</p>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
55 <list type="naked">
ht
parents:
diff changeset
56 <item>Let your life speak</item>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
57 <item>Be patterns, be examples</item>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
58 <item>A testimony to the grace of God as shown in the life of ...</item>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
59 <item>[For Quakers] Christianity is not a notion, but a way</item>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
60 <item>As Friends we commit ourselves to a way of worship</item>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
61 <item>Come regularly to meeting for worship</item>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
62 </list>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
63 <p>And an old family story:</p>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
64 <list type="defn">
ht
parents:
diff changeset
65 <item term="visitor">Are you a Christian?</item>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
66 <item term="host">[pause] You'll have to ask my neighbour</item>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
67 </list>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
68 </div>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
69 </body>
ht
parents:
diff changeset
70 </doc>