# HG changeset patch # User Henry Thompson # Date 1741711902 0 # Node ID 3df8b3fecd093089a2a0cb9fc9ce7cb2fdc81d29 # Parent 97049d69a7281fed0879678ada624abc66706a14 now _very_ last-minute diff -r 97049d69a728 -r 3df8b3fecd09 brian_2025-03-03.txt --- a/brian_2025-03-03.txt Mon Mar 10 17:19:57 2025 +0000 +++ b/brian_2025-03-03.txt Tue Mar 11 16:51:42 2025 +0000 @@ -176,7 +176,69 @@ necessary, but it's at least lurking... ---------------- -For discussion with Jill: - 1) Jim's visit; - 2) Repayment to Catharine - 3) BCS to New Brunswick in August + +Reverting to new section 1, says Brian later -- won't readers mostly +say, of the list I offer [altruism...fidelity], "That's nothing to do +with religion". Just qualifying the assertion, to, 'some [r-s] people +have said that's their business'. + +How about "these topics are topics that people have felt have a +religious dimension" or "to which religious sensibilities are +germane". + +HST: What is it that a Scientist would recognise and accept as a) +non-mechanism and b) relevant to their own Scientific business. + +BCS: Non-effective relations, which the CR book is all about... + + HST what underlies the claim of vast significance for intentionality: + BCS: All the normative predicates are underlain by non-effective + relations, truth for example + + +WARNING: BCS: It's not too late to add a sentence to that effective to +the CR book. + +HST, wrt [19]: not just truly recognise, but go about it in a way that +embraces [r-s] and extends _the nature of science itself_, rather than +conquer more territory for good-old-fashioned-mechanistic Science. + +BCS: what I mean in [19] is, for example, what's altogether missed by +experimental results heralding the discovery of "the contemplation +neuron". + +BCS: tring again, scientists domesticating territories not classically +thought to be of science. How do we understnda this: + + 1) as a broad-swath claim the Science (mechanistic theories) will do + justice to this wider swath (HST: A land-grab). + 2) [HST: Expanding the understanding of what scientific explanation + can look like beyond mere mechanism, to non-effective relations] + 2) [BCS] CR? _Meaning and Mechanism_, were it to exist: both + effective and non-effective relations. This story needs told, + but maybe not here, or not beyond a brief version. Or is HST + confusing M&M and "the Scientific worldview" [today] vs. "the new + expanded scientific worldview [which we are looking forward + to/see encouraging signs of the emergence of], including, but + [BCS] not only that, because also ... + +Alternatively + + If we look at [the best/right-thinking] new scientific + explorations of things classically thought of as the domain of + [r-s], we find a (number of non-mechanistic properties) One is + the theoretical centrality of the non-effective, the role of + embodiment, one is the importance of indexicality. + +or + + 1) The essential role of the non-effective, in particular the + non-efficacy of reference; + 2) The essential role of embodiment; + 2a) The inexorable role of the indexical . + 3) The surplusity of the referent (the way in which it always + exceeds that which the reference appears to convey) [There's a + lot more to be said here] + 4) [HST wonders about "the true flaw in determinism" == "the + universe is [already] running the optimal algorithm"] +